Melco Holdings

Melco Holdings Inc. was incorporated in 1986; currently its subsidiaries are involved in the manufacture of random-access memory products, Flash memory products, USB products, CD-ROM/DVD-RW drives, hard disk drives, local area network products, printer buffers, liquid-crystal displays, Microsoft Windows accelerators, personal computer components and CPU accelerators. A subsidiary of Melco provides corporate services in Japan like Internet set-up, computer terminal installation/set-up, computer education and computer maintenance. The company has also started selling solid-state drives in Japan. Another subsidiary provides the Kuroutoshikou line of PC components.

Buffalo Inc. is currently one of the 16 subsidiaries of Melco Holdings Inc. and is based in Austin, Texas. Initially founded as an audio equipment manufacturer, the company entered the computer peripheral market in 1981 with an EEPROM writer. The name BUFFALO is derived from one of company's first products, a printer buffer and the name for the American Bison (Buffalo).

A Timeline of Firsts

January 1999 – First Wireless Router

December 2002 – First Draft-11g Wi-Fi Products Shipped

November 2003 – First NAS Appliance

January 2005 – First RAID NAS Appliance

April 2006 – First Draft-11n Wi-Fi Products Shipped

November 2009 – First USB 3.0 Storage

Nintendo Wi-Fi USB Connector

Buffalo network-attached storage series

External hard drive

HD DVD Computer Drive

Litigation

In late 2006, the Australian Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) won a lawsuit against Buffalo Inc. under which it would receive a royalty for every WLAN product worldwide. The lawsuits basis was that CSIRO was granted US patent 5487069 in 1996, which grants elements of 802.11a/g wireless technology that had become an industry standard. In June 2007, the federal court in Texas granted an injunction to prevent any more wireless products from shipping until a license agreement had been reached. On September 19, 2008, the Federal Circuit ruled in Buffalo's favor and has remanded this case to the district court ruling that the district court's Summary Judgment was insufficient on the merits of obviousness of CSIRO's patent. Therefore, this case will be tried again before the district court. In this connection Buffalo is hopeful that it will shortly be permitted to, once again, sell IEEE 802.11a and 802.11g compliant products in the United States.