Private company
Bar Standards Board
Logo: Bar Standards Board, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons3
Regulator of barristers in England and Wales
The Bar Standards Board regulates barristers in England and Wales for the public interest. It is responsible for:2 Wikipedia text CC BY-SA 4.0
Last updated Oct 21, 2026.
Overview
- Websitewww.barstandardsboard.org.uk
See how the biggest companies compare on our leaderboards
The Bar Standards Board regulates barristers in England and Wales for the public interest.2
Products and brands
The Bar Standards Board also authorise and regulate "BSB entities", which fall into two distinct bodies: BSB authorised bodies (previously referred to as "entities") are fully owned and managed by authorised, such as lawyers with a current practising certificate. BSB licensed bodies (also known as "Alternative Business Structures" or ABSs), however, are owned and managed jointly by both authorised and non-authorised individuals. The Bar Standards Board held a workshop at the 2016 Annual Bar Conference, and authorised the first three Licensed Bodies in April 2017, including VII Law, Minerva Law and ShenSmith Law. Licensed bodies have been reported by Thomson Reuters as a leading innovation of the legal industry.
From Wikipedia’s article on Bar Standards Board, shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.4
Controversies and legal
Criticism
Withdrawal from Legal Choices
In 2019, the BSB announced it would be withdrawing from Legal Choices, a consumer-facing website designed to help the public to access information about legal issues and legal advisers. The Legal Services Board criticised the BSB's decision, suggesting that regulators needed to do more to help consumers to understand legal services and compare providers.
Handling of BPTC exams during the COVID-19 pandemic
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the BSB postponed the April sitting of the centralised assessments for the BPTC. It announced that Pearson VUE would deliver the exams remotely in August. A small number of exams could be sat in physical centres where reasonable adjustments were required.
Students alleged that the proposals were discriminatory against those with caring responsibilities, living in noisy houses or with poor internet connection, those menstruating, or those who required breaks. They also claimed that international students in different time zones would be negatively affected. They therefore called for the exams to be delivered as open book. After the BSB responded, students also suggested that the arrangements were not suitable for those shielding from COVID-19.
Pearson VUE also had extremely strict anti-cheating protocols, meaning that if another person was detected in any way, the exam would be terminated with no score given.
During the exams, they were hit with a wide range of technical problems, such as exams being terminated without a reason given or loss of internet connection. Students were also unable to take a break for any reason, leading to several students urinating in receptacles while still sitting their exams.
The BSB apologised to students and appointed an independent review, led by Professor Rebecca Huxley-Binns. The review concluded that the BSB had made the correct decision to cancel the April exams and take on the arrangements of the August exams, and the correct decision to use Pearson VUE to deliver online exams, either at home or in a test centre. However, the review also concluded that the closed book format and the decision not to allow breaks both contributed to the outcomes. Finally, the review suggested that the statistical analysis provided by Pearson VUE about how many examinations had been successfully delivered was not reliable.
Read the full text
Handling of complaint against Dinah Rose KC
In 2022, the Bar Standards Board apologised to Dinah Rose KC for making a statement about how it handled a complaint against her.
Rose had acted for the Cayman Islands government before the Privy Council, arguing that the Caribbean islands’ constitution did not give same-sex couples the right to marry. A complaint was made against her, and the BSB responded to the complainant that “As a senior barrister she could be expected to be aware of the cab-rank rule and its operation in practice. Taking this at its highest, this might possibly amount to evidence of recklessness.” Rose had not been given the opportunity to respond to the complaint.
The BSB later clarified that no regulatory action had been taken against Rose, and that she had been correct to act in accordance with the cab-rank rule.
From Wikipedia’s article on Bar Standards Board, shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.4
Timeline
- Jan 1, 2006Founded Founded1
Links
- Websitewww.barstandardsboard.org.uk1
- X (Twitter)x.com/barstandards1
- Facebookwww.facebook.com/barstandardsboard1
- YouTubewww.youtube.com/channel/UCToWMtkDpm5TpRKB0gURAGg1
- LinkedInwww.linkedin.com/company/the-bar-standards-board1
- WikipediaBar Standards Board
- WikidataQ4857969
Sources
The numbers on this page point here. Each one links to the record it came from.
- 1WikidataBar Standards Board on Wikidata
- 2WikipediaBar Standards Board on Wikipedia
- 3Wikimedia CommonsBar Standards Board logo by Bar Standards Board, Public domain
- 4