The story
During 2014, The Financial Times The New York Times, and The Economist all published favorable articles regarding the growing trend of corporations to hire boutique investment banks. Reasons cited included their absence of conflicts, independence, and skill of one or a relative few individuals. The discrediting of traditionally conflicted Wall Street investment banking firms, especially those listed as full-service or conglomerates on the list of investment banks, due to their role in the creation or exacerbation of the 2008 financial crisis, is cited as a primary reason for the ascendancy of these boutique firms. However, advances in technology which permit the outsourcing of all non-core aspects of the firm have also been cited as a cause of this David versus Goliath phenomenon.
Working at boutique investment banks generally requires working longer hours than at larger banks, even though the majority of boutiques are founded and led by former partners at large banks.
As larger investment banks were hit hard by the Great Recession of the 2000s, many senior bankers left to join boutiques, some of which largely resemble the partnerships that ruled Wall Street in the 1970s and 1980s. Boutique investment banks took a greater share of the M&A and advising market at the same time.
Large boutique firms include Evercore, Lazard, Centerview Partners, PJT Partners, Rothschild & Co and Moelis & Company.
From Wikipedia’s article on Boutique investment bank, shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.4