Mackay Shields LLC: investment adviser

The ownership, control and management of MacKay Shields did not change as a result of this conversion. MacKay Shields is 100% owned by NYLIM Holdings, which is wholly owned by NYLIC. Clients and Investment Services MacKay Shields offers a variety of fixed income strategies and products that clients can select depending on their investment objectives. We maintain independently managed investment strategy teams with their own distinct investment process. Certain investment teams consist of Portfolio Managers, Research Analysts, and Traders, while certain other investment teams share Research Analysts and/or Traders. Investment strategies may be available through separately managed accounts and/or collective investment vehicles, including, without limitation, Mutual Funds, ETFs, Collective Investment Trusts, and other private investment funds (referred to herein as “collective investment vehicle(s)” or “fund(s)”). Clients for whom we provide separately managed account services typically adopt bespoke investment guidelines and objectives, subject to our approval. These restrictions generally appear either in the client’s investment management agreement, investment guidelines, or other agreed-upon documents. Clients and prospective clients are advised to carefully review the proposed guidelines for an investment strategy and to review the securities and instruments generally used by MacKay Shields when implementing that strategy. This Brochure should be read together with the applicable investment management agreement, investment guidelines and other governing documents. The information contained in this Brochure is subject in its entirety to and superseded by the investment management agreement and investment guidelines (or similar document(s)) entered into by MacKay Shields and a Client. MacKay Shields’ advice with respect to collective investment vehicles is given in accordance with the investment objectives and guidelines set forth in the applicable offering documentation, advisory agreement, and/or other governing document. Except as otherwise set forth in the commingled vehicle offering documentation, advisory agreement, and/or other governing document, MacKay Shields does not tailor its advisory services to the individual needs of the commingled investment vehicle’s investors, who are generally prohibited from imposing restrictions on investing in certain securities or types of securities. This Brochure should be read together with the applicable offering memorandum, prospectus, or similar document for those funds for a description of the investment strategies and risks associated with those funds. The information contained in this Brochure is subject in its entirety to and superseded by the disclosure in such offering memoranda, prospectuses, or similar documents. Collective investment vehicles may be subject to restrictions on the types of investors who may invest. MacKay Shields may agree to enter in an arrangement with a client to manage a non-discretionary mandate. Clients that choose to engage MacKay Shields for a non-discretionary relationship generally will not achieve the same results as discretionary accounts. For our clients subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), please be advised that MacKay Shields meets the definition of a Qualified Professional Asset Manager as defined in Part IV of

Prohibited Transaction Exemption 84-14 “Plan Asset Transactions Determined by Independent Qualified Professional Asset Managers” for purposes of ERISA. The descriptions set forth in this Brochure of specific advisory services that we offer, investment strategies pursued, and investments made by us on behalf of clients, are general descriptions and should not be understood to limit in any way our investment activities. We may offer any advisory services, engage in any investment strategy and make any investment, including any not described in this Brochure, that we consider appropriate, subject to each client’s investment objectives and guidelines. The investment strategies pursued by MacKay Shields are speculative and entail substantial risks. There can be no assurance that the investment objectives will be achieved. Persons reviewing this Brochure should not consider it to be, and this Brochure should not be construed as, impartial investment advice, or an offer to sell or any solicitation to buy securities of any collective investment vehicle managed by MacKay Shields or its affiliates. Such an offer in connection with any such collective investment vehicle will only be made by means of an offering document delivered to eligible qualified investors. For more information about the management of client accounts, please refer to “Item 7 – Types of Clients,” and for more information about MacKay Shields’ investment strategies, please refer to “Item 8 - Methods of Analysis, Investment Strategies and Risk of Loss,” below. Wrap Fee Programs We participate in wrap fee programs by providing portfolio management services. In these arrangements, we act as a sub-adviser when our affiliate New York Life Investment Management LLC (“NYLIM”) is the adviser. In wrap fee programs, clients typically pay a single wrap fee to the sponsor firm that covers advisory fees as well as trade and execution services, including commission costs. Our fee is typically paid out of that single wrap fee. We receive our fee from NYLIM as we are appointed by NYLIM as a sub-adviser. MacKay Shields is not responsible for determining whether a particular wrap fee program or a specific strategy is suitable or advisable for any particular wrap program client. Such determinations are generally the responsibility of the wrap fee program sponsor and we are responsible only for managing the account in accordance with the selected investment strategy and any reasonable restrictions imposed by the wrap fee program client. Termination procedures and information regarding the refund of prepaid fees for any wrap fee program are described in the wrap fee program sponsor’s brochure. Assets Under Management As of December 31, 2025, MacKay Shields had approximately $159 billion of regulatory assets under management on a discretionary basis.

Asset-based fees are generally negotiated and tailored with clients on a case-by-case basis and are described in the separately managed account client’s investment advisory agreement or the fund’s offering document. Asset-based fees generally range from 0.030% to 1.500% annually of assets under management, depending on the strategy(ies) involved and vehicle(s) in which the assets are held (e.g., a separately managed account,

collective investment vehicle, or registered investment company). In our sole discretion, we have, and anticipate that in the future we will, negotiate a performance-based fee, agree to a fee schedule other than within the range described above, and/or waive, rebate, or reduce fees for clients. Factors taken into consideration when tailoring fees may include, but are not limited to, the investment strategy, portfolio composition, and structure of the account (e.g., lock up or liquidity terms, incentive allocation); existing contractual commitments with other clients; whether the client is an affiliate, the client’s other relationships to MacKay Shields and its affiliates; related accounts under management; servicing requirements; and investment strategy capacity. Performance-Based Fees MacKay Shields receives performance-based fees in connection with the advisory services we provide to clients in a manner designed to comply with Rule 205-3 under the Investments Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act”). Performance-based fees are generally negotiated and tailored with separate account clients on a caseby-case basis and are described in the investment advisory agreement. Performance-based fees for private funds not registered with the SEC are described in the fund’s offering document, and we may agree with certain investors to waive, reduce, offset or rebate the investor’s performance-based fee, which is typically documented in a side letter between the fund and the investor. Performance-based fees generally range from 5.000% to 15.000% of returns and may be subject to performance hurdles, loss carry forward, and other restrictions. See “Item 6 - Performance-Based Fees and Side-by-Side Management,” below for more information regarding performance-based fees. Wrap Fee Programs In wrap fee programs, clients typically pay a single wrap fee to the sponsor firm that covers custody, investment management and trading and execution costs, including commission costs. As a result, the sponsor and client typically request that transactions for clients’ accounts be executed by the sponsor of the wrap fee program (or its affiliate) or a broker-dealer designated by the sponsor firm. In the event that the sponsor or designated broker-dealer cannot provide “best execution” for a given transaction, we, as sub-adviser for the wrap fee program, have the discretion to trade away (that is, trade with a different broker-dealer), and the client may incur a commission cost. As the majority of transactions in the wrap fee programs are fixed income securities that trade over-the-counter, there are no additional mark-ups or commissions on these transactions beyond the customary structure of the bid/offer prices and we believe these transactions are executed on behalf of these clients in such a manner that the client’s total cost or proceeds in each transaction was the most favorable under the circumstances. Prospective clients should refer to the applicable sponsor’s wrap fee program brochure for fee information and additional disclosures. Payment of Fees We bill clients for advisory services according to the fee schedule contained in their investment management agreement or other written document. As agreed to with our clients, fees are typically payable either: (i) in advance based on the value of assets under management at the beginning of the month, quarter, year, or other period; or (ii) in arrears based on the value of assets under management at the end of any such period. Fees are generally calculated using average asset values during the billing period at agreed upon intervals. Clients may choose to have the calculation of their fees be based upon their custodian’s or MacKay Shields’ valuation of their assets. Generally, we may make adjustments in the fee calculation in the event of significant withdrawals from, or deposits into, a client’s account during a calculation period, in accordance with our policy then in effect or as otherwise agreed to with a client. We typically bill our clients for our advisory services, but clients may elect for MacKay Shields to instruct the client’s custodian to deduct fees from their account. With respect to commingled investment vehicles for which MacKay Shields, or its controlled affiliates, serves as General Partner, Managing Member, or similar capacity, we direct the custodians and/or prime brokers to deduct and pay to MacKay Shields our asset-based fees and any performance fees pursuant to the fee schedule contained in the applicable offering agreement or similar agreement (including fee arrangements with specific investors).

For commingled investment vehicles that are Mutual Funds or UCITS, payment of fees is generally made by each fund’s administrator, who is responsible for calculating and processing the payment pursuant to the fund’s prospectus. Other Fees and Expenses Other fees and expenses that clients are responsible for can vary significantly among clients based on the investments and types of transactions executed on behalf of clients, as well as what is permitted to be borne by the client pursuant to the specific advisory agreements for separately managed account clients or offering materials and governing documents applicable to collective investment vehicles. Clients and investors in collective investment funds should review such documents for precise information relating to the fees and expenses borne by a specific client account or collective investment vehicle. For example, a client’s custodian or prime broker charges a custodial fee and may also charge transaction or other fees for services it provides. In addition, the broker-dealers that we select or recommend to execute transactions charge a spread, commission or transaction fee, as the case may be, that an account pays. Further, clients are responsible, to the extent applicable, for other costs, fees, and taxes associated with transactions executed on their behalf, such as, but not limited to, withholding and transfer taxes, clearing and settlement charges, interest expenses, sales and use taxes, transfer and registration fees, or similar charges. More detailed information about our brokerage practices is found under “Item 12 - Brokerage Practices,” below, including the factors that we consider when selecting or recommending broker-dealers for client transactions, including the use of client commissions to acquire research and brokerage services. If a fund’s offering documents or a separately managed account client’s investment management agreement permit, we may add leverage to a client’s portfolio in the form of borrowing. In doing so, a client’s portfolio will incur interest expense on the borrowings used to leverage its positions. To the extent that a client engages in derivatives transactions that require initial margin, interest expense may be required to be paid on initial margin posted in the account’s favor. From time-to-time we engage outside counsel and financial advisors (including, without limitation, tax advisors and third-party valuation providers), with regard to matters relating to particular instruments held in client portfolios (such as, among others, a workout situation). Certain clients are contractually obligated to pay a proportionate amount of the fees of such counsel and financial advisors. We pay the balance of such fees not borne by those clients, which results in a benefit to our clients who are not contractually obligated to pay a portion of such fees. From time-to-time, certain clients may request that we pay certain costs and expenses relating to analytical services provided to the client accounts. Such clients do not incur any additional fees or expenses in instances where we agree to pay for such services. Investors in commingled investment vehicles are subject to their proportional share of the fund’s organizational and operating expenses, which, subject to each fund’s offering or similar document, typically include, but are not limited to: (i) its operation, administration and management, including, without limitation, the management fees and incentive allocations, fees and expenses of an administrator; (ii) investment expenses, such as expenses incurred in the buying, selling, packaging, structuring and holding of securities and other investments; (iii) legal expenses, including the costs of drafting and maintaining the operative agreements or other related documents; (iv) risk management expenses; (v) the fund’s insurance premiums; (vi) internal and external accounting expenses, including fees associated with the valuation or pricing of securities or other instruments in which the fund invests; (vii) audit and tax preparation expenses; (viii) consulting fees, custodian or prime broker fees, brokerage commissions, interest related to margin transactions, leverage and borrowing costs, any fees of the transfer agent and registrar, taxes imposed on the fund; and (ix) the cost of acquiring a surety bond and any extraordinary expenses. Collective investment vehicles that are feeder funds as part of a master-feeder structure indirectly bear the portfolio and other expenses of the master fund (including, without limitation, the types of expenses described above and the fees and expenses of such master fund’s administrator) pro rata based on the feeder fund’s interest in such master fund. Certain collective investment vehicles may also utilize trading vehicles or other special purpose

vehicles, and all portfolio and other expenses relating to such vehicles are borne by the collective investment vehicles, and in turn by such fund’s investors. If a fund’s offering documents or a separately managed account client’s investment management agreement permit, we may invest all or a portion of their assets in one or more collective investment vehicles. Such clients bear their proportionate share of the fund’s expenses in connection with such investments. When we invest on behalf of a client in a collective investment vehicle not registered with the SEC that is sponsored and/or managed by MacKay Shields, we do not receive a management fee, or incentive allocation (if applicable) from the investment fund with respect to those clients’ investments. Instead, such clients pay us a fee in accordance with the applicable offering document or investment management agreement, and which is typically based on all the assets of the client account, including the amounts invested in the collective investment vehicle. With respect to investments in collective investment vehicles that we do not manage, the management fee(s) paid to the third-party investment manager of such investment fund is in addition to the management fee payable to MacKay Shields. Termination for Separately Managed Accounts Unless otherwise specified in a client’s investment management agreement, our clients have the right to terminate our services any time without penalty. In the event of termination, we will prorate any fees to the date of termination and we will refund any unearned fees for those clients who paid in advance. Sale of Investment Products by Supervised Persons There will be instances where registered representatives of our affiliated broker-dealer NYLIFE Distributors LLC (“NYLIFE Distributors”), who in certain cases are employees of our Firm, recommend that a client or investor, or a prospective client or investor, invest in a collective investment vehicle sponsored and/or managed by MacKay Shields. When this occurs, neither MacKay Shields nor any of our supervised persons receive transaction-based compensation – whether asset-based sale charges, service fees or other direct payments – for the sales that result from these recommendations to the advisory client. However, MacKay Shields generally benefits from additional investments made in any such collective investment vehicle, given that management fees in these vehicles are based on a percentage of assets under management. See “Item 14 - Client Referrals and Other Compensation” below.

We address the conflicts of interest created by “side-by-side-management” by having a Trade Allocation Policy designed so that all client accounts will be treated fairly and reasonably and no one client account will receive, over time, preferential treatment over another. In addition, it is our policy that we will not permit cross trades between clients unless the portfolio manager instructing the trade deems it in the best interest of both clients at the time and obtains compliance approval of the transaction. Furthermore, we have short sale procedures that require pre-approval of certain short sales and restrict certain short sales. It is MacKay Shields’ goal to provide individualized treatment and customized solutions to our clients and we cannot ensure that in every instance an investment will be allocated on a pro-rata basis. Based on the factors listed below, among others, there will be instances in which we allocate a transaction only to certain of the accounts eligible to participate, allocate a larger or smaller portion of a transaction to an account or group of accounts than to other accounts participating in the transaction, or exclude certain accounts from participating in a transaction that may be suitable for the account(s).

When determining which accounts will participate in a trade, we will consider various criteria which may include, but are not limited to: (i) client cash limitations; (ii) actual and anticipated or potential account inflows and outflows; (iii) duration and/or average maturity; (iv) credit ratings and anticipated credit ratings; (v) account size, deal size, trade lots; (vi) processing costs; (vii) existing exposure to an issuer or industry type, and other concentration limits; (viii) specific investment objectives, investment guidelines and anticipated guidelines changes; (ix) regulatory requirements and/or tax considerations; (x) borrowing capacity; and (xi) other practical limitations. If an order is filled in its entirety, it will generally be allocated among clients in accordance with the target allocation. If the order is partially filled, it will typically be allocated pro-rata based on the target allocation methodology, subject to the considerations described in the preceding paragraph, unless that would be impractical. If in our judgment or as a result of factors described above, the amount that would then be allocated to an account would not be suitable or be too small to properly manage, that account may be excluded from the allocation. We have determined that pre-allocating fixed income trades based on predetermined allocation amounts is not feasible or practicable for all instances given the nature of their respective markets and client requirements, or the information limitations specific to a deal. In those cases, an allocation will be made promptly following execution but generally no later than the end of the trading day. Such orders will be based upon the criteria noted above and will not unfairly discriminate against or advantage one account over another over time. More detailed information about our allocation and aggregation practice is found under “Item 12 - Brokerage Practices,” below.

To the extent that the information in this Brochure conflicts with an investment management agreement or investment guidelines governing a separately managed account, the investment management agreement and investment guidelines will control. Investors or potential investors in collective investment vehicles should refer to the offering memorandum or prospectus for those funds for a description of the investment strategies and risks associated with those funds. The information contained in this Brochure is subject in its entirety to and superseded by the disclosure in such offering memoranda or prospectuses. Collective investment vehicles may be subject to restrictions on the types of investors who may invest. Nothing in this Brochure is intended as an offer to sell securities. Clients participating in a wrap program that MacKay Shields sub-advises should refer to the sponsor’s wrap fee program brochure for fee information and additional disclosures.

Risk of Loss Investing in securities involves risk of loss that clients should be prepared to bear. The investment performance and the success of any investment strategy or particular investment can never be predicted or guaranteed, and the value of a client’s investments will fluctuate due to market conditions and other factors. The investment decisions made and the actions taken will be subject to various market, liquidity, currency, economic, political and other risks and, as a result, investments may lose value. Material risks will vary based on the types of investments purchased for the relevant strategy. Please see “Material Risk Factors” below. Methods of Analysis and Sources of Information Our methods of investment analysis include economic and industry analysis, fundamental research concerning specific companies, securities and issuers, quantitative analysis, technical analysis and any other method that one or more of our investment personnel may deem appropriate from time-to-time. We may not utilize each of the described methods in connection with each investment strategy or with respect to particular portfolios. Our investment professionals obtain information from a variety of sources, including, without limitation:

Meetings and discussions with industry analysts and issuers;

Discussion of publicly available information with issuers and company personnel, on-site inspections and issuer sponsored meetings;

With respect to new issues and private placements, the underwriter or placement agent;

Discussion with a company’s customers, competitors and suppliers;

Computerized screening, evaluation, optimization studies and reports, trade journals and services, governmental publications, statistical summaries and analysis;

Reports from rating agencies, financial analysts and various news and industry sources, as well as on-line articles and periodicals; and

Such other sources as one or more of our investment personnel deem appropriate from time-to-time.

The investment guidelines for portfolios are generally monitored using security and issuer information that is obtained from external data providers and/or internal sources. We rely on the accuracy of the information obtained from the external data providers and our investment teams. For new issues, we initially rely on the accuracy of the information provided by the issuer and underwriter of the new issue. For the avoidance of doubt, absent specific written direction from a client, MacKay Shields is responsible for determining how to appropriately classify an issue or issuer for purposes of monitoring investment guidelines and reporting, including, without limitation, country and industry sector classifications. Such methods of classifications are subject to change in MacKay Shields’ sole discretion and without notice. Investment Strategies Our Firm has several investment teams that offer a variety of fixed income investment strategies and solutions. MacKay Shields’ investment teams are: Convertibles, Emerging Market Debt, Global Fixed Income, High Yield, and MacKay Municipal ManagersTM. Certain of our investment mandates are managed cooperatively by more than one investment team.

Convertible Investment Team The Convertible investment team seeks to maximize total return while protecting against downside risk. The team uses a bottom-up approach to identify the merits of convertible securities relative to the underlying common stocks. The team’s analysis of a convertible security involves, among other considerations, assessing the issuer’s fundamental business and financial statements, estimating a reasonable valuation for the issuer’s common shares, and the merits of the convertible security as a vehicle through which an investor can participate in the potential appreciation of the issuer’s common shares. In addition, by analyzing the security’s bond features, the team seeks to assess the level of downside protection inherent in the security should the

common shares decline in value. Such analysis would include scrutinizing a bond’s put and call features, the bond’s maturity date and the debt structure, asset value, cash flow and fixed obligations of the issuer. The investment team also analyzes the underlying stock volatility, and the value of the securities without the convertibility feature. The combination of evaluating downside and upside potential for each convertible, in conjunction with convertible valuation models and fundamental analysis of the convertible’s underlying equity securities, is a hallmark of the investment team’s investment approach. The Convertible investment team may take into account a convertible valuation model, which is a bond and option valuation model that determines the theoretical values of the convertibles based on the price movement of the underlying common stock. It may also utilize third-party models. Buy and sell decisions are based on both quantitative factors and fundamental judgment. If in the judgment of the Convertible investment team, a convertible no longer has an attractive risk/reward profile, or if the investment team believes that company fundamentals are deteriorating, the security may be sold.

Emerging Market Debt Investment Team The Emerging Market Debt investment team is comprised of investment personnel employed by NYL Investments UK LLP, an affiliate of MacKay Shields, who have been appointed as dual-hatted officers of MacKay Shields to provide investment management services to clients of MacKay Shields. For additional information please see “Item 10 - Other Financial Industry Activities and Affiliations” below. The Emerging Market Debt investment team incorporates a top down and bottom-up approach, driven by disciplined fundamental research, and is tailored to clients’ risk tolerance and constraints. The opportunity set is defined with an emphasis on liquidity and left-tail risk mitigation. As a starting point the team will typically eliminate smaller issuers and issuers with the weakest credit quality. The research process consists of three concurrent pillars: Sovereign research, which is the cornerstone of the team’s approach, global macro analysis and corporate credit analysis. The global macro pillar focuses on exogenous developed-market and global forces influencing emerging market debt performance. The macro pillar drives top-down portfolio risk budgeting and informs high-level asset class allocation as well as country weights in the portfolio. The sovereign research pillar focuses on idiosyncratic, country-specific factors. This analysis drives top-down country weights and bottom-up sovereign security selection. Sovereign analysis frequently also feeds into corporate security selection. The corporate credit research pillar uses a proprietary quantitative model to help prioritize the team’s resources with respect to sovereign, sector or idiosyncratic credit analysis. When putting forward a security selection idea for debate, credit analysts will model how each new idea will impact portfolio risk. This seeks to avoid undesired exposures to certain factors or excessive concentration in regions or countries. If permitted by a client’s investment guidelines and subject to appropriate accounts being opened with third parties, certain of the investment strategies managed by the Emerging Market Debt investment team may use derivatives, including, but not limited to, Treasury futures and currency forwards or may involve shorting instruments such as Treasury securities.

Global Fixed Income Investment Team The Global Fixed Income investment team (“GFI”) incorporates an integrated top-down and bottom-up approach in the decision-making process. The team’s philosophy is rooted in the belief that debt markets do not reward for inappropriately high levels of risk, and therefore, the team seeks to identify and mitigate uncompensated risk while seeking diversified sources of excess return. The top-down element of GFI’s investment process incorporates an analysis of the important economic underpinnings of the market’s risk cycle. The investment team believes that monetary policy, as influenced by central bank actions, is a significant contributor to credit creation and an important driver of the inflection

points in the market cycle. However, monetary policy alone is not the only driver of credit and therefore careful attention is paid to other influencing factors. The bottom-up component of the investment team’s investment process feeds into its macro analysis to help identify significant changes in financial market conditions, real economic developments, and available credit. Individual credits are run through a multi-factor analysis of financial and non-financial risk characteristics seeking to gain a complete picture of the credit profile of an issuer. In the case of securitized assets, the team conducts a thorough evaluation of an issuer’s underwriting standards, analyzes the level of credit enhancement, the strength of the servicer and the quality of the underlying collateral. Sovereign investments are influenced by a country’s current account, rate of economic growth, level of inflation, amount of foreign reserves, political stability and bankruptcy laws to evaluate the attractiveness of the cost of debt of each country relative to the risk factors identified. When Investment opportunities are analyzed for possible inclusion into a portfolio, the investment team looks to accomplish two important goals: (1) quantify the downside risk; and (2) measure the upside potential in a relative value context. Bottom-up research complemented with a top-down macroeconomic overlay can help identify those securities having the most attractive risk/return profiles. Given the asymmetric risk-return profile of certain investments, the team believes a strong focus on downside protection in the pursuit of diversified sources of excess return is required to invest successfully in the market. The Global Fixed Income investment team has established various forums that meet regularly to discuss specific investments, asset allocation and portfolio exposures in the context of these important risk factors. MacKay Shields and NYL Investors LLC (“NYL Investors”), an affiliate of MacKay Shields, entered into a research sharing agreement and GFI and the Fixed Income Investors team (“FII”) of NYL Investors utilize a unified research team that produces research for both groups. Investment research, including issuer analyses and recommendations, is shared contemporaneously among GFI and FII pursuant to the NYLIM Shared Research Policy and related Information Barrier and Material Nonpublic Information Governance policies. Additionally, certain personnel of GFI have been appointed as dual-hatted officers of NYL Investors, and certain personnel of FII of NYL Investors have been appointed as dual-hatted officers of MacKay Shields, including portfolio management, research, and trading personnel. For additional information please see “Item 10 Other Financial Industry Activities and Affiliations” below. If permitted by a client’s investment guidelines and subject to appropriate accounts being opened with third parties, certain of the investment strategies managed by GFI may use derivatives, including, but not limited to, Treasury futures, Credit Default Swaps and currency forwards, or may involve shorting instruments such as Treasury or corporate securities.

High Yield Investment Team The High Yield investment team’s strategy employs a bottom-up, value-oriented approach to investing in the high yield market. The investment team seeks to maximize the default adjusted yield and spread of a diversified portfolio. The team assesses the credit risk of potential investments by reviewing, among other things, capital structure, covenants, asset coverage, cash flow generating profile, risk of default, and anticipated recovery value. The investment team’s process focuses on high yield instruments that, in the judgment of the investment team, have a large margin-of-safety represented by excess asset coverage (i.e., the value of the company relative to debt) and the ability to generate free cash flow over time. The investment team categorizes positions in its portfolios into one of four risk groups. When assessing relative value of investments in the various risk groups for purchase or sale for client portfolios, the team focuses on the appropriate yield and spread differences among risk groups, which depends on the market environment.

The High Yield investment team will generally sell a position for one of the following reasons: 1) when the price or spread makes its relative value unattractive; 2) when a company’s fundamentals worsen to a point that, in the judgment of the investment team, asset coverage becomes insufficient; 3) for diversification purposes; or 4) to satisfy investment guidelines and restrictions. Subject to client constraints, the High Yield investment team may invest in a variety of debt obligations, including, but not limited to, bonds, notes, leveraged loans, convertible securities and preferred stock. Also subject to client constraints, the investment team may invest opportunistically in equities and emerging market debt instruments in certain strategies, as well as derivatives, including, but not limited to, currency forwards.

Municipal Investment Team The MacKay Municipal ManagersTM investment team uses a fundamental value approach combined with a top-down macro view and bottom-up, credit research-driven security selection in the construction of U.S. taxexempt and taxable municipal portfolios. The MacKay Municipal ManagersTM investment team’s investment philosophy is centered on an actively managed, research-driven relative value approach that incorporates: 1) active management designed to capitalize on market inefficiencies, to seek a yield advantage, and to achieve an attractive after-tax total return; 2) a disciplined investment process, focused on reducing volatility; and 3) fundamental, bottom-up credit research that takes into consideration the regulatory, political and tax related factors specific to the municipal market. Where so directed for client portfolios with specific tax sensitivities, the investment team considers tax effects in its decision-making process by incorporating the client’s current and expected effective tax rate, and capital gain and loss restrictions. The MacKay Municipal ManagersTM investment team’s process seeks to capitalize on opportunities created by the mispricing of securities and information gaps. The investment team evaluates technical trends and analyzes individual issues, while emphasizing risk control. Their value-oriented, fundamental investment approach focuses on research, risk management, and trading, and their process encompasses sector/security allocation, credit selection, yield curve positioning, and buy/sell trade execution. The MacKay Municipal ManagersTM investment team begins by outlining its macro view regarding the economy, interest rates, inflation, geo-political concerns (including pending legislation that impact taxes and sectors of the municipal market). This top-down component guides the investment team’s decisions relating to portfolio weightings for credit ratings, structures, states, yield curve positioning and sectors. The investment team’s investment philosophy does not seek to make interest rate calls or duration bets. Instead, the investment team looks to maintain duration neutrality within a certain range of the relevant benchmark. The MacKay Municipal ManagersTM investment team’s fundamental bottom-up security selection process includes a review of individual securities, from both a credit perspective and a spread, or relative value, perspective. The investment team’s credit review includes examining documentation such as official statements, financial reports, and/or capital program plans. In addition, the investment team analyzes cash flows, the individual security features of bonds and, when relevant, the demand features of a project. Furthermore, by understanding the political purpose behind a project, the investment team seeks to gain additional insight into the support for the securities should the bonds come under economic pressure (i.e., toll roads, airports, etc.). Depending upon the sector, the investment team reviews collateral such as mortgages, reserve funds, negative pledges and guarantees. The MacKay Municipal ManagersTM investment team incorporates an exit strategy into the evaluation of new prospective holdings. Some reasons to exit a position include, but are not limited to: (1) realization of the full

potential return; (2) a change in outlook for the security or if the security no longer fits the investment guidelines of the portfolio; (3) a change in the issuer’s financial position; or (4) a change in credit rating. Subject to client constraints, certain investment strategies managed by the MacKay Municipal ManagersTM investment team may use derivatives including but not limited to Treasury futures or Municipal Rate Lock securities. The team may also short instruments such as Treasury securities. Material Risk Factors

Below is a summary of material risks that apply to the investment strategies managed by our investment teams. The information set forth below cannot disclose every potential risk associated with an investment strategy, or all of the risks applicable to a particular fund or account. Rather, it is a summary of the material risks that apply to the strategies employed by one or more of our investment teams, the securities and other instruments in which one or more of our investment teams may invest, and our business generally. Investment-Related Risks Asset-Backed Securities Risk. Asset-backed securities (“ABS” or “Asset Backed Securities”) are securities the payments on which are provided primarily or exclusively by a discrete pool of financial assets. The financial assets, consisting of consumer or commercial obligations, are transferred into limited-purpose vehicle structures designed to reduce or eliminate risks so that the primary risk of payments on the issued securities is performance by the underlying obligors on the financial assets. Through the use of special purpose trusts, corporations and other vehicles, a broad range of securitization techniques are applied to create different types of securities backed by financial assets. Various types of financial assets are securitized, including consumer obligations in the form of automobile loans and leases, credit card receivables and student loans, and commercial debt obligations in the form of equipment loans and leases, floorplan leases, small business loans, large corporate loans and commercial mortgage loans. Holders of asset-backed securities are exposed to various risks, including credit risk, market risk, liquidity risk, structural and legal risks, interest rate risk, concentration risk, operational risk, regulatory risk, and other risks as more fully described below. Risks also arise from discretionary behavior of the issuer or its service providers performing obligations under securitization agreements, such as remedial decision-making by servicers, voluntary seller buybacks from, or contributions to, an underlying pool of loans, or issuer or collateral manager reinvestments of proceeds of loans that are repaid or sold. An originator or sponsor may perform more than one role in a securitization process, simultaneously serving as originator of loans, servicer, administrator, underwriter, provider of liquidity, provider of hedging, or credit enhancer. A multiplicity of roles may be involved, often through a single firm for one or more securitizations. Auction Rate Securities Risk. Auction rate securities usually permit the holder to sell the securities in an auction at par value at specified intervals. The dividend is reset by “Dutch” auction in which bids are made by broker-dealers and other institutions for a certain amount of securities at a specified minimum yield. The dividend rate set by the auction is the lowest interest or dividend rate that covers all securities offered for sale. While this process is designed to permit auction rate securities to be traded at par value, there is the risk that an auction will fail due to insufficient demand for the securities. Build America Bonds Risk. The Build America Bond (“BAB”) market is smaller and less diverse than the broader municipal securities market. BABs are a form of municipal financing. Bonds issued after December 31, 2010, do not qualify as BABs because the BAB enabling legislation expired on December 31, 2010. It is difficult to predict the extent to which a market for such bonds will develop and there can be no assurance that BABs will be actively traded. BABs may experience greater illiquidity than other types of municipal securities, which may have a negative effect on the value of the bonds. Closed-End Fund Risk. Closed-end funds are investment companies that generally do not continuously offer their shares for sale. Rather, closed-end funds typically trade on a secondary market, such as the New York Stock Exchange or the NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. Closed-end funds are subject to management risk because the adviser to the closed-end fund may be unsuccessful in meeting the fund's investment objective. Moreover, investments in a closed-end fund generally reflect the risks of the closed-end fund's underlying portfolio

securities. Closed-end funds may also trade at a discount or premium to their NAV and may trade at a larger discount or smaller premium subsequent to purchase by a fund. Closed-end funds may trade infrequently and with small volume, which may make it difficult for a portfolio to buy and sell shares. Closed-end funds are subject to management fees and other expenses that may increase their cost versus the costs of owning the underlying securities. A fund may also incur brokerage expenses and commissions when it buys or sells closedend fund shares. Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities Risk. The risks associated with investments in commercial mortgagebacked securities (“CMBS”) reflect the risks of investing in the real estate securing the underlying loans, including the effect of local and other economic conditions, the ability of tenants to make payments, and the ability to attract and retain tenants. Real property is susceptible to certain specific risks, such as acts of God, including earthquakes, floods and other national disasters, acts of war or terrorism, changes in governmental laws and regulations, including local zoning ordinances and the related costs of compliance, environmental risks and risk of loss associated with uninsured or under-insured real property. If any of these or similar circumstances arise, it may reduce the return from an affected property which may, in turn, reduce the payments on the securities held by a client. CMBS obligations represent only an investor’s ownership interests in the issuing entity, whose primary assets are the mortgage loans being securitized. Repayment on the mortgage loans underlying CMBS are generally dependent on the cash flow of the mortgaged properties securing such mortgage loans. Effects on economic, political, environmental and governmental conditions at any given time may have an effect on a mortgaged property’s ability to generate cash flow by reducing occupancy, lowering prevailing market rental rates, increasing defaults among tenants and introducing use restrictions on the mortgaged property, among others. Any such decrease in cash flow at a given mortgaged property may have a negative effect on the related borrower’s ability to pay its monthly debt service payments. Furthermore, as most mortgage loans included in CMBS transactions are interest only for the term of the mortgage loan with balloon payments due at maturity, the ability of a related borrower to sell the mortgaged property or refinance the mortgage loan at the scheduled maturity date may affect the borrower’s ability to repay the principal due at maturity. Additionally, CMBS products generally rely on third-party service providers to enforce yield maintenance charges and prepayment premiums due on the underlying mortgage loans and to make advances in respect of defaulted and/or delinquent loans. Third-party service providers may have interests that are different than those of the holders of the securities, and may, at times, have interests that are adverse to those of the holders of the securities. Holders of CMBS have limited control over the actions of third-party service providers and may not effectively be able to replace any such service provider. There can be no assurance that third-party service providers will act in the best interests of our clients or that MacKay Shields will have the ability to exercise any control rights with respect to such service providers. Committee Participation Risk. Although we have no obligation to do so, we, on behalf of one or more clients, sometimes participate in ad hoc committees of unsecured creditors, committees of secured creditors, committees of cross-holders or similar bodies or other committees in seeking to improve our clients’ recoveries with respect to borrowers or otherwise negotiate directly with borrowers with respect to restructuring their debt or their capital structure. There can be no assurance of obtaining results that are favorable to our clients. We may participate, on behalf of one or more clients, on official unsecured creditor committees appointed by trustees in bankruptcies, where we are deemed to have duties to other creditors of the borrower, which might thereby expose us or our clients to liability. In connection with some reorganizations or financial restructurings, it is possible that claims are made, or litigation is commenced or threatened, against the borrower, us, and/or our clients who participate in such reorganizations or restructurings. In cases where we are unable to conclude negotiations, we may, but are not obligated to, take actions against a borrower, which may include, declaring default or acceleration, commencing legal action, instituting a proceeding seeking a judgment of insolvency or bankruptcy, or any other relief under applicable laws affecting creditors rights, which actions might expose us or our clients to liability or counterclaims. In certain cases, we may decide not to participate on a committee or may not be permitted or be able to do so, which could limit a client’s recovery. In addition, participation in restructuring activities frequently provides the participant with material non-public information that may

restrict our ability to trade in any of the company’s securities on behalf of our clients. Determination of whether information is material and non-public and how long such information restricts trading is sometimes a matter of considerable uncertainty and judgment. Furthermore, participation on such committees may result in MacKay Shields’ clients incurring expenses, including legal fees. Convertible Securities Risk. Convertible securities may be subordinate to other securities. In part, the total return for a convertible security depends upon the performance of the underlying stock into which it can be converted. Also, issuers of convertible securities are often not as strong financially as those issuing securities with higher credit ratings, are more likely to encounter financial difficulties and typically are more vulnerable to changes in the economy, such as a recession or a sustained period of rising interest rates, which could affect their ability to make interest and principal payments. If an issuer stops making interest and/or principal payments, the strategy could lose its entire investment. Counterparty Risk. MacKay Shields expects to cause clients to establish relationships to obtain financing, derivative execution, derivative intermediation and prime brokerage services that permit MacKay Shields to trade in any variety of markets or asset classes over time. However, there can be no assurance that clients will be able to establish or maintain such relationships. An inability to establish or maintain such relationships could limit MacKay Shields’ trading activities, create losses, preclude us from engaging in certain transactions or prevent MacKay Shields from trading at optimal rates and terms. Moreover, a disruption in the financing, derivative intermediation and prime brokerage services provided by any such relationships could have a significant impact on a MacKay Shields’ business due to the need for such counterparties. We effect certain transactions in the “over-the-counter” or “OTC” derivatives markets. The stability and liquidity of OTC derivatives transactions depends in large part on the creditworthiness of the parties to the transactions. In the OTC markets, MacKay Shields enters into contracts directly with dealer counterparties, which may expose clients to the risk that a counterparty will not settle a transaction in accordance with its terms because of a solvency or liquidity problem with the counterparty. Delays in settlement may also result from disputes over the terms of the contract (whether or not bona fide). In addition, clients may have a concentrated risk in a particular counterparty, which may mean that if such counterparty were to become insolvent or have a liquidity problem, losses would be greater than if MacKay Shields had caused such clients to enter into contracts with multiple counterparties. Certain OTC derivative contracts require collateral to be posted. If there is a default by a counterparty, under most normal circumstances clients will have contractual remedies pursuant to the agreements related to the transaction. However, exercising such contractual rights may involve delays or costs which could result in the net asset value of a portfolio being less than if we had not caused such client to enter into the transaction. Furthermore, there is a risk that any of such counterparties could become insolvent and/or the subject of insolvency proceedings. In such case, the recovery of securities from such counterparty or the payment of claims therefore may be significantly delayed, and MacKay Shields may recover substantially less than the full value of the securities entrusted to such counterparty. In addition, it is possible that legal and regulatory reforms may impact the laws that apply to insolvency proceedings and may impact whether a client may terminate its agreement with an insolvent counterparty. Collateral that MacKay Shields causes a client to post to its counterparties that is not segregated with a third-party custodian may not have the benefit of customer-protected “segregation” of such funds. In the event that a counterparty was to become insolvent, such a client may become subject to the risk that it may not receive the return of its collateral or that the collateral may take some time to return. In addition, we may use counterparties located in jurisdictions outside the United States. Such local counterparties usually are subject to laws and regulations in non-U.S. jurisdictions that are designed to protect customers in the event of their insolvency. However, the practical effect of these laws and their application to a client’s assets are subject to substantial limitations and uncertainties. Because of the range of possible factual scenarios involving the insolvency of a counterparty and the potentially large number of entities and jurisdictions that may be involved, it is impossible to generalize about the effect of such an insolvency on a client and its assets. Investors in fund should assume that the insolvency of any such counterparty would result in significant delays in recovering the fund’s assets from, or the payment of claims by, such counterparty and a loss to the fund, which could be material.

Credit Default Swaps Risk. Credit default swaps may be used to implement MacKay Shields’ view that a particular credit, or group of credits, will experience credit improvement or deterioration. In the case of expected credit improvement, MacKay Shields may sell credit default protection in which it receives a premium to take on the risk. In such an instance, the obligation to make payments upon the occurrence of a credit event creates leveraged exposure to the credit risk of the referenced entity. MacKay Shields may also buy credit default protection with respect to a referenced entity if, in our judgment, there is a high likelihood of credit deterioration. In such instance, the applicable clients will pay a premium regardless of whether there is a credit event. Currency Risk. The value of a client’s assets may be affected favorably or unfavorably by the changes in currency rates and exchange control regulations. Some currency exchange costs may be incurred by clients when a strategy changes investments from one country to another. Currency exchange rates may fluctuate significantly over short periods of time. They generally are determined by the forces of supply and demand in the respective markets and the relative merits of investments in different countries, actual or perceived changes in interest rates and other complex factors, as seen from an international perspective. Currency exchange rates can also be affected unpredictably by intervention by governments or central banks (or the failure to intervene) or by currency controls or political developments. Debt Securities Risk. The risks of investing in debt securities or loans include (without limitation): (i) credit risk -- the issuer may not repay the loan created by the issuance of that debt instrument; (ii) maturity and duration risk -- a debt instrument with a longer maturity or duration may fluctuate in value more than one with a shorter maturity or duration; (iii) market risk -- low demand for debt instruments may have a negative impact on their price; (iv) interest rate risk -- when interest rates go up, the value of a debt security generally goes down, and when interest rates go down, the value of a debt security generally goes up; (v) selection risk -- the instruments that we select may underperform the market or other instruments selected by other managers; (vi) call risk -- during a period of falling interest rates, the issuer may redeem a security by repaying it early, which may reduce a strategy’s income, if the proceeds are reinvested at lower interest rates; and (vii) extension risk -- during a period of rising interest rates prepayments may decrease, thus effectively lengthening the maturity and duration and causing its value to decline even more. Derivatives Risk. The use of derivatives may increase the volatility of the value of a portfolio and may involve a large amount of risk and potential loss relative to a small investment of cash and thus may have a leveraging effect on the client’s portfolio. For example, forward commitments pose the risk that the security, currency or other asset subject to the forward commitment may be worth less when it is issued or received than the price agreed to when the commitment was made. Swap agreements may be difficult to value and may be susceptible to liquidity and credit risk. Futures contracts may result in losses in excess of the amount invested in the futures contract, and which may be unlimited. Derivatives may also be subject to counterparty risk, that is, the risk that the other party in the transaction will not fulfill its contractual obligations. Certain derivatives transactions may require the posting of initial and/or variation margin (including, but not limited to, futures, forward settling mortgage transactions, and swaps), which is at risk of loss if the market moves against a portfolio’s position. If a portfolio does not provide the required margin within the prescribed time, its position may be liquidated at a loss, and the portfolio will be liable for any resulting deficit in its account which may require it to sell other positions at disadvantageous prices. Derivatives may not perform as intended and, if used for hedging purposes, may not be effective in offsetting losses on the positions being hedged. Distressed Securities Risk. Investments in distressed securities are subject to substantial risks in addition to the risks of investing in other types of high-yield securities. Distressed securities are speculative and involve substantial risk that principal will not be repaid. Generally, a holder will not receive interest payments on such securities and may incur costs to protect its investment. In addition, a holder’s ability to sell distressed securities and any securities received in exchange for such securities may be restricted. Emerging Markets Risk. Investing in emerging markets involves certain risks and special considerations which at times may be heightened when compared to investing in other more established economies or securities markets. Such risks may include: (1) the risk of nationalization or expropriation of assets or confiscatory

taxation; (2) social, economic and political instability and uncertainty, including war; (3) dependence on exports and the corresponding importance of international trade; (4) price fluctuations and greater price volatility, less liquidity, less available information and smaller capitalization of securities markets; (5) currency exchange rate fluctuations; (6) rates of inflation; (7) controls on foreign investment and limitations on repatriation of invested capital and on the Fund’s ability to exchange local currencies for U.S. dollars; (8) governmental involvement in and control over the economies; (9) that governments may decide not to continue to support economic reform programs generally and could impose centrally planned economies; (10) differences in and/or lack of uniform auditing and financial reporting standards which may result in the unavailability of material information about issuers; (11) less extensive regulation of the securities markets; (12) the settlement period of securities transactions in non-U.S. markets may be longer; (13) less developed corporate laws regarding fiduciary duties of officers and directors and the protection of investors; (14) certain considerations regarding the maintenance of portfolio securities and cash with non-U.S. sub-custodians and securities depositories; (15) imposition of certain taxes; (16) higher transaction costs; and (17) difficulty in enforcing contractual obligations. Taxation of interest, dividends, capital gains, and other income, as well as gross sale or disposition proceeds, received by non-residents varies among emerging countries and, in some cases, tax rates may be high. In addition, emerging countries typically have less well-defined tax laws and procedures. With respect to certain countries, there is a possibility of expropriation and confiscatory taxation. In emerging markets, there may be less government supervision and regulation of business and industry practices, stock exchanges, over-the-counter markets, brokers, dealers and issuers than in other more established countries. Whatever supervision is in place may be subject to manipulation or control. While many emerging market countries have mature legal systems comparable to those of more developed countries, others do not. Moreover, the process of legal and regulatory reform may not be proceeding at the same pace as market developments, which could result in investment risk. Legislation to safeguard the rights of private ownership may not yet be in place in certain areas, and there may be the risk of conflict among local, regional and national requirements. In certain cases, the laws and regulations governing investments in securities may not exist or may be subject to inconsistent or arbitrary application or interpretation. Both the independence of judicial systems and their immunity from economic, political or nationalistic influences remain largely untested in certain countries. There may also be difficulties in pursuing legal remedies or in obtaining and enforcing judgments in non-U.S. courts. Equity Securities Risk. Investments in common stocks, other equity securities and convertible securities are particularly subject to the risk of changing economic, stock market, industry and company conditions and the risks inherent in our ability to anticipate such changes that can adversely affect the value of a strategy’s holdings. Opportunity for greater gain often comes with greater risk of loss. Exchange Traded Fund (“ETF”) Risk. The risks of owning an ETF generally reflect the risks of owning the underlying securities they are designed to track, although lack of liquidity in an ETF could result in it being more volatile than the underlying portfolio of securities. Disruptions in the markets for the securities underlying ETFs purchased or sold by the strategy could result in losses on the strategy’s investment in ETFs. ETFs also have management fees that increase their costs versus owning the underlying securities directly. Extension Risk. Extension risk is the risk of a security’s expected maturity lengthening in duration due to the deceleration of prepayments. This may magnify the effect of increases in interest rates, as securities may be likely to be prepaid when interest rates rise. Floating and Variable Rate Debt Risk. Floating and variable rate debt, which includes floating rate loans, provide for a periodic adjustment in the interest rate paid. The rate adjustment intervals may be regular and range from daily up to annually, or may be based on an event, such as a change in the prime rate. Although certain floating rate loans are collateralized, there is no guarantee that the value of the collateral will be sufficient to repay the loan. In times of unusual or adverse market, economic or political conditions, floating rate loans may experience higher than normal default rates. Floating and variable rate debt may be subject

to greater liquidity risk than other debt instruments, meaning that there may be limitations on the strategy’s ability to sell the instruments at any given time. The presence of a floor (which typically is based on SOFR) in floating rate and variable rate debt instruments may result in coupon payments that remain unchanged when interest rates rise. While floors ensure a minimum yield, they can also act as an anchor until the reference rate of the floating rate and variable rate debt instrument breaches the level established by the floor. So long as the underlying reference stays below the floor, floating rate and variable rate debt instruments with this feature will behave more like conventional bonds in that coupon payments will remain unchanged. Such instruments also may lose value. Foreign Investment Risk. Investments in foreign securities or loans are subject to risks that differ from those of U.S. issuers. These risks may include, but are not limited to: fluctuating currency values; less liquid trading markets; greater price volatility; political and economic instability; less publicly available information about issuers; changes in U.S. or foreign tax or currency laws; and changes in monetary policy. Foreign securities or loans may be more difficult to sell than U.S. securities or loans. These and other risks may be greater in emerging market countries, the economies of which tend to be more volatile than the economies of developed countries. To the extent a strategy invests to a significant extent in a particular country or region, a strategy’s performance may be affected by political, social and economic conditions in that country and/or geographical region or operational risks particular to that country or region. Investments in foreign securities or loans may also involve higher brokerage and custodian fees and may also incur higher expenses and costs, which could affect a strategy's total return. The risks of investing in foreign securities or loans in emerging market countries are likely to be greater than in foreign countries with developed securities markets and more advanced regulatory regimes. Additionally, investments in depositary receipts may entail the special risks of foreign investing, including currency exchange fluctuations, government regulations, and the potential for political and economic instability. Furthermore, it may be difficult to invoke legal protections across borders. High-Yield Securities Risk. Investments in high-yield securities (i.e., rated Ba3 or lower by Moody's Investors Service, Inc., BB- or lower by Standard & Poor's Ratings Services or comparably rated by another nationally recognized statistical rating organization (“NRSRO”) or those that that are not rated by a NRSRO, but that have characteristics of high-yield securities), are sometimes considered speculative as they present a greater risk of loss than higher quality securities. Such securities may, under certain circumstances, be less liquid than higher rated securities. These securities pay investors a premium (a high interest rate or yield) because of the increased risk of loss. These securities can also be subject to greater price volatility. In times of unusual or adverse market, economic or political conditions, these securities may experience higher than normal default rates. Interest Rate Risk. Interest rate risk is the risk that the market value of the bonds owned by an account will fluctuate as interest rates go up and down. For example, when interest rates go up, the market value of bonds owned by an account generally will go down. Nearly all fixed income strategies are subject to this type of risk, but investment strategies utilizing bonds with longer maturities are more subject to this risk than an account holding bonds with shorter maturities. Investment funds not registered with the SEC Risk. The investment strategies and risks associated with investment funds not registered with the SEC that certain investment strategies may utilize are described in the offering memoranda for those funds. Investors should carefully review the offering memoranda for additional information about the risks associated with those funds. Investment Grade Securities Risk. Investment-grade securities (i.e., rated Baa3 or better by Moody's Investors Service, Inc., BBB- or better by Standard & Poor's Ratings Services or comparably rated by another nationally recognized statistical rating organization (“NRSRO”) or those that that are not rated by a NRSRO, but that have characteristics of investment-grade securities) are subject to the risk of an issuer's inability to meet principal and interest payments on the obligations and may also be subject to price volatility due to such factors as

interest rate sensitivity, the market perception of the creditworthiness of the issuer and general market liquidity. Investment Management Risk. Our judgments regarding markets and investments may be incorrect, and the investment strategies, practices and risk analysis that we use may not produce the desired results. Leverage and Borrowing Risk. Leverage, including borrowing, will cause the value of an account to be more volatile than if the account did not use leverage. This is because leverage tends to exaggerate the effect of any increase or decrease in the value of the account’s portfolio securities. Where permitted by a client’s investment guidelines, we may engage in transactions or purchase instruments that give rise to forms of leverage. In addition, where permitted by the client’s investment guidelines, we may borrow money for the purpose of leveraging the portfolio. The use of leverage may cause an account to liquidate portfolio positions when it would not be advantageous to do so in order to satisfy its obligations. A portfolio will also incur interest expense on the borrowings used to leverage its positions. To the extent that a portfolio’s assets have been leveraged through the borrowing of money, the purchase of securities on margin or otherwise, the interest expense and other costs and premiums incurred in relation thereto may not be recovered. If gains earned by the account fail to cover such costs the net asset value of the portfolio may decrease faster than if there had been no borrowings. In addition, to the extent that futures, swaps and other derivative financial instruments are used, it should be noted that they inherently contain much greater leverage than a non-margined purchase of the underlying security, commodity or instrument. These products are typically subject to variation or other interim margin requirements which may force premature liquidation of investment positions. Liquidity Risk. The value of illiquid instruments may reflect a discount from the market price of comparable securities and loans for which a liquid market exists, and accordingly may have a negative effect on the value of a strategy’s assets. Securities and loans that are liquid at the time of purchase may subsequently become illiquid due to events relating to the issuer of the instruments, market events, economic conditions or investor perceptions. To meet client requests to withdraw assets, a strategy may be forced to sell securities or loans at an unfavorable time and/or under unfavorable conditions. Low trading volume, lack of a market maker, large position size or legal restrictions (including price fluctuation limits or “circuit breakers,” an affiliation with the issuer of a security or possession of material non-public information about the issuer) may limit or prevent the strategy from selling particular instruments or unwinding derivative positions at desirable prices. Holding less liquid instruments increases the likelihood that the strategy will honor a redemption request in-kind. Legislative and policy developments in the United States and elsewhere are causing dealers in fixed income securities to reduce their inventories, which may make securities less liquid and more volatile and may exacerbate price declines in periods of economic stress. Loan Interest Risk. In a typical loan syndication, a number of lenders, usually banks (co-lenders), lend a borrower a specified sum pursuant to terms and conditions of a loan agreement. One of the co-lenders generally acts as the agent bank with respect to the loan; where loans are purchased via assignment, the owner becomes a direct lender. A loan assignment is the actual sale of the loan, in whole or in part, where the owner of the portion of the loan assigned is considered a lender under the loan agreement. A loan participation means that the original lender maintains ownership over the loan and that the owner of the loan participation interest does not have a credit relationship with the borrower. As such, the owner of the participation interest generally will not be entitled to enforce its rights against the agent bank or borrower and must rely on the lending institution for that purpose. The principal credit risk associated with acquiring a loan interest is the credit risk associated with the underlying borrower. Additional credit risk exists with a loan participation interest rather than a loan assignment because of the risk of insolvency of the co-lender from which the loan participation was originally purchased and that of any person interposed between the owner of the loan participation and the co-lender.

There may not be a readily available market for loan interests, which in some cases could result in the strategy disposing of such interests at a substantial discount from face value or holding such interests until maturity. There is also the credit risk of the underlying corporate borrower as well as the lending institution or other participant from whom the owner purchased the loan participation interests. In addition, the notional exposure of a client’s portfolio may exceed the cash value of the portfolio due to the lengthy settlement period typical for loans (which may be 30 days or more). This leverage is the result of the portfolio having an economic interest in a loan it purchases prior to the date that the cash for such loan is actually paid by the client’s account. Loss of Money Risk. Investing in securities involves risk of loss that clients should be prepared to bear. The investment performance and the success of any investment strategy or particular investment can never be predicted or guaranteed, and the value of a client’s investments will fluctuate due to market conditions and other factors. Market Changes Risk. The value of the strategy’s investments may change because of broad changes in the markets in which the strategy invests, which could cause the strategy to underperform other funds or accounts with similar objectives. Money Market/Short-Term Securities Risk. To the extent a strategy holds cash or invests in short-term securities, there is no assurance that the strategy will achieve its investment objective. Mortgage Dollar Roll Transaction Risk. Mortgage dollar roll transactions are subject to certain risks, including the risk that securities delivered at the end of the roll, while substantially similar, may be inferior to what was initially sold to the counterparty or may have a lower value. These transactions may involve leverage, as the client may be exposed to changes in value of its current investments as well as those to be delivered at the end of the roll. Municipal Securities Risk. Municipal securities risks include the ability of the issuer to repay the obligation, the relative lack of information about certain issuers, and the possibility of future tax and legislative changes that could affect the market for and value of municipal securities. These risks include: (i) General Obligation Bonds Risk -- timely payments depend on the issuer’s credit quality, ability to raise tax revenues and ability to maintain an adequate tax base; (ii) Revenue Bonds (including Industrial Development Bonds) Risk -- these payments depend on the money earned by the particular facility or class of facilities, or the amount of revenues derived from another source, and may be negatively impacted by the general credit of the user of the facility; (iii) Private Activity Bonds Risk -- Municipalities and other public authorities issue private activity bonds to finance development of industrial facilities for use by a private enterprise; the private enterprise pays the principal and interest on the bond, and the issuer does not pledge its full faith, credit and taxing power for repayment; (iv) Moral Obligation Bonds Risk -- moral obligation bonds are generally issued by special purpose public authorities of a state or municipality; if the issuer is unable to meet its obligations, repayment of these bonds becomes a moral commitment, but not a legal obligation, of the state or municipality; (v) Municipal Notes Risk -- municipal notes are shorter-term municipal debt obligations that pay interest that is, in the opinion of bond counsel, generally excludable from gross income for federal income tax purposes (except that the interest may be includable in taxable income for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax) and that have a maturity that is generally one year or less; if there is a shortfall in the anticipated proceeds, the notes may not be fully repaid and the strategy may lose money; and (vi) Municipal Lease Obligations Risk -- in a municipal lease obligation, the issuer agrees to make payments when due on the lease obligation; although the issuer does not pledge its unlimited taxing power for payment of the lease obligation, the lease obligation is secured by the leased property. To be tax exempt, municipal bonds must meet certain regulatory requirements. If a municipal bond fails to meet such requirements, the interest received by the strategy from its investment in such bonds may be taxable. It is possible that interest on a municipal bond may be declared taxable after the issuance of the bond, and this determination may apply retroactively to the date of the issuance of the bond, which could

cause a portion of prior distributions made by a strategy to be taxable in the year of receipt. It is also possible that future legislation or court decisions would adversely affect the tax-exempt status, and thus the value, of municipal bonds or certain categories thereof. Prepayment Risk. Prepayment risk is the risk that the issuers of the bonds will prepay them at a time when interest rates have declined. Because interest rates have declined, we may have to reinvest the proceeds in bonds with lower interest rates, which can reduce returns. Ratings-Related Risk. Ratings assigned by Moody's, S&P, Fitch and/or other nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (“NRSRO”) to securities are only the views of those NRSROs and are not a guarantee of quality. NRSROs attempt to evaluate the safety of principal and interest payments and do not evaluate the risks of fluctuations in market value. Also, NRSROs may fail to make timely changes in credit ratings in response to subsequent events, so that an issuer's current financial condition may be better or worse than a rating indicates. No assurance can be given that ratings assigned will not be withdrawn or revised downward if, in the view of Moody's, S&P, Fitch, or other NRSROs circumstances so warrant. Many issuers do not have their securities rated by the NRSROs in order to save costs and investment in such unrated issues poses risks associated with potential lower levels of credit-related information for investors and absence of or more limited third-party surveillance of such issuers. Real Estate Investment Trust Risk. Investments in a Real Estate Investment Trust Risk (“REIT”) involve risks associated with direct ownership of real estate, including decline in property values, extended vacancies, increases in property taxes, and changes in interest rates. Additionally, REITs are dependent upon management skills, may not be diversified, may experience substantial cost in the event of borrower or lessee defaults and are subject to heavy cash flow dependency. Regional Focus Risk. At times, we may increase the relative emphasis of our investments in a particular region or country. Issuers in a particular region or country might be affected by changes in economic conditions or by changes in government regulations, availability of basic resources or supplies, or other events that affect that region or country more than others. If the strategy has a greater emphasis on investments in a particular region or country, it may be subject to greater risks from adverse events than a strategy that is more geographically diversified. Short Selling Risk. If a security sold short increases in price, the strategy may have to cover its short position at a higher price than the short sale price, resulting in a loss. Because losses on short sales arise from increases in the value of the security sold short, such losses are theoretically unlimited. By contrast, a loss on a long position arises from decreases in the value of the security and is limited by the fact that a security’s value cannot go below zero. With respect to our long/short and leveraged strategies, if a security sold short increases in price, the strategy may have to cover its short position at a higher price than the short sale price, resulting in a loss. The strategy will have substantial short positions and must borrow those securities to make delivery to the buyer. The strategy may not be able to borrow a security that it needs to deliver or it may not be able to close out a short position at an acceptable price and may have to sell related long positions before it had intended to do so. Thus, the strategy may not be able to successfully implement its short sale strategy due to limited availability of desired securities or for other reasons. The strategy also may be required to pay a premium for a security and other transaction costs, which would increase the cost of the security sold short. The amount of any gain will be decreased, and the amount of any loss increased, by the amount of the premium, dividends, interest or expenses the strategy may be required to pay in connection with the short sale. Until the strategy replaces a borrowed security, it is required to maintain a segregated account of cash or liquid assets with a broker or custodian to cover the strategy's short position. Generally, securities held in a segregated account cannot be sold unless they are replaced with other liquid assets. The strategy's ability to

access the pledged collateral may also be impaired in the event the broker fails to comply with the terms of the contract. In such instances the strategy may not be able to substitute or sell the pledged collateral. Additionally, the strategy must maintain sufficient liquid assets (less any additional collateral pledged to the broker), marked-to-market daily, to cover the short sale obligations. This may limit the strategy's investment flexibility, as well as its ability to meet redemption requests or other obligations. Because losses on short sales arise from increases in the value of the security sold short, such losses are theoretically unlimited. By contrast, a loss on a long position arises from decreases in the value of the security and is limited by the fact that a security's value cannot go below zero. By investing the proceeds received from selling securities short, the strategy could be deemed to be employing a form of leverage, which creates special risks. The use of leverage may increase the strategy's exposure to long positions and make any change in the strategy's net asset value greater than it would be without the use of leverage. This could result in increased volatility of returns. There is no guarantee that the strategy will leverage a portfolio, or if it does, that any such leveraging strategy will be successful. Regulatory authorities in the United States or other countries may prohibit or restrict our ability to fully implement the short-selling strategy, either generally or with respect to certain industries or countries, which may impact our ability to fully implement our investment strategies. Certain foreign countries have adopted, and others may adopt, rules restricting the short-selling of certain stocks. Typically, these restrictions have been focused on financial stocks. The duration and scope of these restrictions have varied from country to country. Short Term Trading Risk. Some of our strategies may experience a portfolio turnover rate of greater than 100%. Strategies with high turnover rates (over 100%) often have higher transaction costs and may generate short-term capital gains. Synthetic Convertible Securities Risk. The values of a synthetic convertible and a true convertible security may respond differently to market fluctuations. In addition, in purchasing a synthetic convertible security, the strategy may have counterparty (including counterparty credit) risk with respect to the financial institution or investment bank that offers the instrument. Purchasing a synthetic convertible security may provide greater flexibility than purchasing a traditional convertible security. Tender Option Bond Trusts Risk. In a typical Tender Option Bond Trusts (“TOB Trusts”) transaction, a client (on its own or together with other depositors) deposits a municipal security or a basket of municipal securities into a special purpose entity, the TOB Trust. The TOB Trust issues certificates that bear interest at floating short-term tax-free rates (“Participations” or “floaters”) to outside parties and residual interests (“residual interests” or “inverse floaters”) to the client and other depositors, if applicable. The use of inverse floaters creates effective leverage. Due to the leveraged nature of these investments, the value of an inverse floater will increase and decrease to a significantly greater extent than the values of the TOB Trust’s underlying municipal bonds in response to changes in market interest rates or credit quality. An investment in inverse floaters typically will involve greater risk than an investment in a fixed rate municipal bond, including, in the case of recourse inverse floaters (discussed below), the risk that the Fund may lose more than its original principal investment. Additionally, the Fund’s use of TOB Trusts is subject to the following risks: Need of Continued Demand for Trust Certificates. The TOB Trust structure depends upon the ability of the remarketing agent to successfully remarket tendered trust certificates and the remarketing agent’s continued willingness and ability to commit capital to such structures. Additionally, trust certificates are typically purchased by tax-exempt money market funds, which are subject to regulatory requirements regarding the types of investments they can make as well as diversification. Duration Risk of TOB Trusts. The leverage of the TOB Trust residual interests to which the account will have may vary. As a result, the account may be required to directly collateralize or pay the swap counterparty for collateralizing the TOB Trust in a certain amount of the principal value of the municipal securities held by the Trust to support any margin call should the value of these municipal securities decline.

Effect of Interest Rate Changes Generally and on TOB Trust Residual Interests. All fixed income securities, including Tax Preferenced Securities, entail some degree of interest rate risk. An increase in interest rates will generally result in a decrease in the prices of bonds. Interest rate risk can be measured by the price change of a security given a one basis point move in the yield of the security. This price change, multiplied by the notional amount of the security, equals the dollar amount of the interest rate risk. TOB Trust residual interests are “inverse floaters” — their yield is equal principally to the difference between the fixed interest rate on the long-term Tax Preferenced Securities held by the TOB Trusts and on the distribution rate on Participations. If municipal short-term rates increase, so will the distribution rate on the short-term floating rate trust certificates, and the yield on the TOB Trust residual interests will be eroded. Without sufficient return on its TOB Trust residual interests to at least defray the account’s interest-rate and duration hedging costs, the portfolio is likely to incur a decline in yield. To-Be-Announced Securities Risk. The value of the to-be-announced security (“TBA”) may decline prior to when the security is received. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Treasury Market Practices Groups (“TMPG”) recommended that market participants exchange two-way variation margin on a regular basis to mitigate counterparty credit and systemic risks. While the counterparty credit risk is significantly mitigated, margin and documentation requirements increase the cost of TBA trades, including costs associated with wiring of cash to meet variation margin calls and interest expense required to be paid on variation margin posted in your favor. Turnover/Frequent Trading Risk. Portfolio turnover is a measure of how frequently assets within a portfolio are bought and sold. The turnover rate for a portfolio will vary from year to year and depending on market conditions, turnover could be greater in periods of unusual market movement and volatility. In addition, portfolio turnover rates may vary based on how such rates are calculated. A higher portfolio turnover rate is a result of frequent trading and involves correspondingly greater expenses to the portfolio, including brokerage commissions, dealer mark-ups, or other transactional costs. The use of futures or other forward settling derivatives may result in the appearance of higher portfolio turnover as positions are rolled forward in order to maintain a specific exposure. Unit Investment Trusts Risk. Unit Investment Trusts (“UITs”) are a type of registered investment company. UITs typically issue redeemable securities that the UIT will buy back from an investor, at the investor’s request, at the unit’s approximate net asset value. The UITs in which an account may invest may have a relatively fixed portfolio of securities consisting of shares of closed-end municipal bond funds or municipal bonds or other Tax Preferenced Securities. Valuation Risk. There is no central place or exchange for fixed-income securities trading. Fixed-income securities and loans generally trade on an “over-the-counter” market, which may be anywhere in the world where the buyer and seller can settle on a price. Due to the lack of centralized information and trading, the valuation of fixed-income securities and loans may carry more risk than that of common stock. Uncertainties in the conditions of the financial market, unreliable reference data, lack of transparency and inconsistency of valuation models and processes may lead to inaccurate asset pricing. In addition, other market participants may value securities and loans differently. As a result, when a security or other instrument is sold in the market, the amount that the fund or account receives may be less than the amount at which it was valued. Valuations of the assets, which will affect the amount of fees (including, to the extent applicable, performance compensation) payable to MacKay Shields may involve uncertainties and judgmental determinations, and if such valuations prove to be incorrect, client portfolio value could be adversely affected. For example, in the case of an overvaluation of a client’s portfolio, MacKay Shields’ compensation would be greater than if the correct lower valuation had been used.

When-Issued Securities Risk. The principal risk of transactions involving when-issued securities is that the security will be worth less when it is issued or received than the price the strategy agreed to pay when it made the commitment. Non-Investment Related Risks Affiliated Research and Trading Risk. MacKay Shields shares investment research with its affiliate, NYL Investors, pursuant to formal research sharing and information barrier policies. Although investment and trading decisions are made independently, transactions in the same issue or issuer may occur on the same trading day or at or around the same time across affiliated investment advisers, which in less liquid markets could adversely affect execution outcomes. MacKay Shields maintains policies and compliance monitoring controls designed to mitigate these risks; however, there can be no assurance that such risks will not occur, Cyber Security and Privacy Risk. Due to the increased use of and dependence on technology in the ordinary course of business, investment managers and any third parties may be susceptible to breaches in cyber security. Such incidents may have an adverse impact on MacKay Shields and/or its clients and portfolio companies and may result in regulatory penalties, reputational damage, business interruption, loss of critical personal or business information, misappropriation of assets, additional compliance costs associated with corrective measures, and/or financial loss. While MacKay Shields has implemented a framework to address such cyber security risks, there are inherent limitations in any cyber security program, including the possibility that certain risks have not been identified, and there is no assurance that the framework implemented by MacKay Shields will be effective. Unintentional cyber incidents can occur, such as the inadvertent release of confidential information, which could expose our client’s personal information to third parties and result in financial harm to them and the violation of applicable privacy laws. As part of its business, Mackay Shields and its service providers, processes, stores and transmits large amounts of electronic information, including information relating to the transactions and personally identifiable information of MacKay Shields’ clients and investors in collective investment vehicles. The techniques used to obtain unauthorized access to data, disable or degrade service, or sabotage systems change frequently and may be difficult to detect for long periods of time. Hardware or software acquired from third parties may contain defects in design or manufacture or other problems that could unexpectedly compromise information security. Network connected services provided by third parties may be susceptible to compromise, leading to a breach of the network maintained by a service provider to the Firm. Our service providers’ systems or facilities may be susceptible to employee error or malfeasance, government surveillance, or other security threats. On-line services provided may also be susceptible to compromise. Breach of a service providers’ information systems may cause information relating to the transactions of a client or investor and/or their personally identifiable information to be lost or improperly accessed, used or disclosed. If a service provider fails to adopt or adhere to adequate data security policies, or in the event of a breach of its networks, information relating to the transactions of a client or investor and/or their personally identifiable information may be lost or improperly accessed, used or disclosed. The loss or improper access, use or disclosure of MacKay Shields’, its client’s or its investor’s proprietary information may cause financial loss, the disruption of business, liability to third parties, regulatory intervention, or reputational damage. Market Event Risk. Market risks include political, regulatory, market and economic developments, including developments that impact specific economic sectors, industries or segments of the market, which may affect the value of a client’s investment. Turbulence in financial markets, tariffs and other protectionist measures, political development and uncertainty, central bank policy, and reduced liquidity in equity, credit and fixed income markets may negatively affect many issuers worldwide, which could have an adverse effect on a client’s investment. During a general downturn in the securities markets, multiple asset classes may be negatively affected. Geopolitical and other events, including war, terrorism, economic uncertainty, trade disputes, public health crises and related geopolitical events have led, and in the future may lead, to disruptions in the US and world economies and markets, which may increase financial market volatility and

have significant adverse direct or indirect effects on an account and its investments. Market disruptions could cause an account to lose money, experience significant redemptions, and encounter operational difficulties. Although multiple asset classes may be affected by a market disruption, the duration and effects may not be the same for all types of assets. Moreover, political developments, such as the impact of both executive and legislative elections around the world could create significant uncertainty with respect to legal, tax and regulatory regimes in which a registered fund, as well as the Firm, will operate. Changes in policy resulting from new governments and administrations could result in a number of changes to US and non-US economic, national security, fiscal, tax and other policies, as well as the global financial markets generally. Any significant changes in, among other things, economic policy, the regulation of the asset management industry, tax law, immigration policy and/or government entitlement programs could have a material adverse impact on a client’s investments. Other Business Interruptions Risk. Our investment advisory activities or operations could be interrupted or adversely affected by extraordinary events, emergency situations or circumstances beyond our control, including, without limitation, outbreaks of infectious diseases, pandemics or other serious public health concerns, war, terrorism, failure of technology, accidents, disasters, government macroeconomic policies or social instability. In order to mitigate the effects of these types of events, we may activate our business continuity and disaster recovery plans. These plans are designed to ensure that we provide our advisory and other services to our clients without interruption and may require, among other things that our employees work and access our information technology, communications or other systems from their homes or other remote locations. Although we have a business continuity plan to enable personnel to work remotely and effectively, there is no assurance that this will work effectively at all times. In order for employees to effectively work remotely, our technologies and other operational infrastructure must function properly. Any failure in the proper functioning of such technologies or other operational infrastructure could disrupt remote employees’ abilities to adequately carry out their functions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Regulatory Risk. U.S. and Foreign Government regulation and/or intervention may change the way MacKay Shields is regulated, may affect the value of its investments, and may limit and/or preclude the Firm’s ability to achieve its investment objectives. Government regulation may change frequently and may have significant adverse consequences. Moreover, government regulation may have unpredictable and unintended effects. In addition to exposing MacKay Shields to potential new costs and expenses, additional regulation or changes to existing regulation may also require changes to the Firm’s investment practices. MacKay Shields cannot predict the effects of any new governmental regulation that may be implemented, and there can be no assurance that any new governmental regulation will not adversely affect the Firm’s ability to achieve its investment objectives. Responsible Investing Risk. Each of our investment teams has adopted Responsible Investing Policies. Due to the breadth of each investment team’s investment activities, procedures may vary, not be applicable in certain cases, or MacKay Shields may not have discretion or control with respect to operational and other material decisions related to certain investments. The likely impact on the return of an investment from an actual or potential material decline in the value of an investment due to an environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) related event or condition will vary and depend on several factors including, but not limited to, the type, extent, complexity and duration of the event or condition, prevailing market conditions, and the existence of any mitigating factors. Additionally, certain of MacKay Shields’ investment teams do, and in the future may, manage mandates that emphasize Responsible Investing as a primary factor in strategy construction, including, without limitation, investment strategies pursuant to which MacKay Shields will primarily seek to invest in assets that meet its proprietary ESG criteria or as defined by a client. Such Responsible Investing focused investment strategies can cause an account to perform differently compared to accounts that do not utilize a Responsible Investing focused investment strategy. For example, the investment decisions made pursuant to Responsible Investing focused investment strategies may result in an

account not participating in certain investment opportunities when it might be otherwise advantageous to do so or selling certain instruments for related reasons when it might be otherwise disadvantageous to do so. There are significant differences in interpretation of what it means for a company to have positive or negative ESG characteristics and others may not agree with the assessments conducted by our investment teams. The data used to determine whether companies are managed and behave responsibly is gathered through external data sources and internal research. The subjective nature of nonfinancial criteria means that a wide variety of financial outcomes are possible and the data available may not adequately address what our investment team(s) believe to be material sustainability factors. The analysis is also dependent on companies disclosing relevant data and the availability of this data can be limited. There is no guarantee that measures taken by MacKay Shields’ analysis of ESG-related risk factors will identify certain material deficiencies and/or mitigate or prevent risks from materializing. Systems and Operational Risk. MacKay Shields relies heavily on financial, accounting and other data processing systems to execute, clear and settle transactions across numerous and diverse markets and to evaluate certain investments, to monitor client portfolios and capital, and to generate risk management and other reports that are critical to oversight of its activities. In addition, MacKay Shields relies on information systems to store sensitive information. Certain of MacKay Shields’ activities are dependent upon systems operated by third parties, including prime brokers, administrators, custodians, agent banks, market counterparties and other service providers, and MacKay Shields may not be in a position to verify the risks or reliability of such third-party systems. Failures in the systems employed by MacKay Shields, prime brokers, administrators, custodians, agent banks, counterparties, exchanges and similar clearance and settlement facilities and other parties could result in mistakes made in the confirmation or settlement of transactions, or in transactions not being properly booked, evaluated or accounted for. Disruptions in MacKay Shields’ operations may cause clients to suffer, among other things, financial loss, the disruption of business, liability to third parties, regulatory intervention or reputational damage. Any of the foregoing failures or disruptions could have a material adverse effect on clients. Service Provider and Data Source Risk. MacKay Shields relies on third-party service providers to (i) provide information relating to instruments and the markets that Mackay Shields relies on in providing advisory services; and (ii) analyze and review information MacKay Shields provides to them and to produce performance and other data reports (the information, analysis, review, and reports together are “Data”). If Data supplied by these service providers were to be incorrect or incomplete, our investment analysis and reports may be incorrect or adversely impacted and our strategies may not perform as expected. MacKay Shields seeks to detect whether Data are inaccurate or incomplete and reports these issues to its service providers, but cannot always detect problems with Data supplied to it before the Data are used. If Data are discovered to be incorrect or incomplete, MacKay Shields will take all reasonable steps to correct the Data. While MacKay Shields seeks to protect itself contractually when it engages services providers, these contractual provisions may be insufficient to protect MacKay Shields. For example, MacKay Shields service providers may be affected by viruses, power outages, or other acts beyond MacKay Shields control. They may not be able to prevent an employee or third-party from stealing or affecting MacKay Shields data. Further, any of our service providers could, without notice to MacKay Shields, cease doing business, file for bankruptcy, or sell all or a part of its business to another company. Any of these actions could adversely affect MacKay Shields and may seriously disrupt its business. Technology and Licensing Risk. MacKay Shields relies heavily on the use of proprietary and non-proprietary software, data and intellectual property being licensed to us on a non-exclusive basis by commercial software analytics, research and data supply entities. To the extent that an unforeseeable software or hardware malfunction or problem is caused by a defect, virus or other outside force, MacKay Shields’ business, including its financial condition, and/or client portfolios may be adversely affected. In addition, if the licensed material is found to be owned by a third-party, and not by the licensing company, as represented, MacKay Shields’ business, including our financial condition, and/or our client’s portfolios could be adversely affected.

Use of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Risk. The Firm uses artificial intelligence, generative artificial intelligence, and machine learning technology (collectively, “Artificial Intelligence Technology”) in certain processes, including in connection with investment research, data analytics, client service and operations. The Firm adheres to a comprehensive artificial intelligence risk review and governance framework, which encompasses both artificial intelligence governance and vendor oversight. The Firm does not utilize fully autonomous Artificial Intelligence Technology for decision-making purposes; instead, all outputs generated by such technology undergo human review and oversight. Recent technological advances in Artificial Intelligence Technology pose risks to the Firm and our business. Our advisory business could be further exposed to the risks of Artificial Intelligence Technology if third-party service providers or any counterparties, whether or not known to the Firm, also use Artificial Intelligence Technology in their business activities. The Firm will not be in a position to control the operations of third-party service providers or counterparties, the manner in which third-party products are developed or maintained or the manner in which third-party services are provided. The Firm’s use of Artificial Intelligence Technology and the use by any of the parties described in the previous paragraph could include the input of confidential information (including material non-public information) — either by third parties in contravention of non-disclosure agreements (or similar undertakings or obligations of confidentiality) or by personnel of the Firm in contravention of the Firm’s policies — into Artificial Intelligence Technology applications, resulting in such confidential information becoming part of a dataset that is accessible by other third-party Artificial Intelligence Technology applications and users. Artificial Intelligence Technology is generally highly reliant on the collection and analysis of large amounts of data, and it is not possible or practicable to incorporate all relevant data into the model that Artificial Intelligence Technology utilizes to operate. Certain data in such models will inevitably contain a degree of inaccuracy and error — potentially materially so — and could otherwise be inadequate or flawed, which would be likely to degrade the effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence Technology. Artificial Intelligence Technology may produce output that is of poor quality, or is otherwise inaccurate or incomplete, and any such inaccuracies or errors could have adverse impacts on the Firm’s business. The use of Artificial Intelligence Technology may lead to increased risks of cyber-attacks or data breaches and the ability of bad actors to launch more automated, targeted and coordinated attacks due to the vulnerability of Artificial Intelligence Technology to cybersecurity threats. Artificial Intelligence Technology may expose the Firm to increased risk of competition from other market participants, loss of intellectual property or other proprietary or confidential information, security vulnerabilities, and regulatory scrutiny. The Firm has implemented policies and procedures designed to govern its internal use of Artificial Intelligence Technology. These policies and procedures are intended to promote responsible use of Artificial Intelligence Technology and include standards for risk management, governance, vendor oversight and output review. However, such policies and procedures may not anticipate every risk associated with the use of Artificial Intelligence Technology, and there can be no assurance that they will be effective in mitigating all such risks. Artificial Intelligence Technology and its applications, including in the private investment and financial sectors, continue to develop rapidly, and it is impossible to predict the future risks that will from time to time arise from such developments.

MacKay Shields has established and controls various entities whose purpose is to serve as the general partner, managing member, or equivalent role of commingled investment vehicles managed by MacKay Shields or its affiliates. Certain MacKay Shields senior employees are Directors or officers of such entities and/or of investment vehicles sponsored and/or managed by MacKay Shields. MacKay Shields does not receive compensation for providing access to such personnel from these entities. Some of our employees are officers and/or, directors of NYLIC, NYLIM or other affiliated companies. Some of our employees are also directors of certain investment funds not registered with the SEC that we or our affiliates sponsor. In addition, some of our senior employees participate in various committees of NYLIM. Such employees do not receive additional compensation for providing such services. Employees whose total compensation exceeds a pre-defined threshold may elect to have MacKay Shields allocate up to two-thirds of their long-term incentive compensation to track the investment returns of one or more registered investment companies for which we or an affiliate act as adviser or sub-adviser, or private funds not registered with the SEC for which we or an affiliate act as investment adviser. Such investments will be made directly by MacKay Shields in its own name, and applicable employees will not have any ownership interest in such funds in connection with the long-term incentive compensation program. The portion of their long-term incentive compensation that tracks the investment returns in such registered and non-registered investment funds is subject to gains and losses based on the performance of those investment funds. This creates a conflict of interest as certain employees may have an incentive to favor investment funds in which a portion of their long-term incentive compensation has been invested when allocating investment opportunities. If such favoritism were to occur, it might lead to better performance results for such funds to the detriment of other accounts, which may ultimately result in higher compensation for such employees. MacKay Shields has policies and procedures in place, such as its Trade Allocation and Material Non-public Information (“MNPI”) Policies, which are designed to address these conflicts of interest. Notwithstanding the above, Mackay Shields exercises independent judgment in the management of our clients’ investments. MacKay Shields claims exemptions to the Commodity Pool Operator and Commodity Trading Advisor registration categories under the Commodity Exchange Act of 1936, as amended. Similarly, certain investment funds not registered with the SEC for which we or our affiliates, may act as general partner, managing member, or equivalent role of, claim available exemptions to the Commodity Pool Operator category under the Commodity Exchange Act of 1936, as amended. Investment Management Relationships Involving Affiliates MacKay Shields currently acts, or in the future is expected to act, as investment manager, investment adviser, or sub-adviser for:

Accounts as to which NYLIC, NYLIM, NYL Investors, the New York Life Foundation, or their affiliates advise, sponsor, act as trustee, or have a substantial interest, including portions of the general accounts of NYLIC and its affiliated insurance companies;

Investment funds belonging to the NYLI family of funds that include, The NYLI Funds, NYLI VP Funds Trust, NYLI Funds Trust, as well as open-end registered investment companies for which NYLIM is the investment adviser and administrator and NYLIFE Distributors acts as principal underwriter and distributor;

Closed-end registered investment companies for which NYLIM is the investment adviser and administrator and NYLIFE Distributors acts as principal underwriter and distributor;

ETFs belonging to the NYLI ETF Trust, where NYLIM acts as the advisor and NYLIFE Distributors provides certain distribution-related services to the Trust;

UCITS funds for which an affiliate is the investment adviser and/or controls the management company.

Investment funds not registered with the SEC for which we, our affiliates, or senior officers of any of the aforementioned entities may act as general partner, manager, investment advisor, sponsor or otherwise have a substantial interest;

Wrap fee programs with respect to which NYLIM provides advisory services; and

Accounts that are investment vehicles for insurance products sponsored by NYLIC (or its affiliated insurance companies) or that are subject to contractual insurance arrangements with NYLIC (or its affiliated insurance companies).

Conflicts may arise as to the allocation of investment opportunities among those clients and our other clients that provide an incentive for us to favor those clients. Also, where the client is an account that serves as an investment vehicle for an insurance product sponsored by NYLIC (or its affiliated insurance companies) or that is contractually insured by NYLIC (or its affiliated insurance companies), we may have an incentive to manage the account in a manner that may mitigate the risk of insuring the account but which reduces its return potential. We have adopted a Trade Allocation Policy designed so that trades are allocated among client accounts in a fair and reasonable manner and that no one client account will receive over time preferential treatment over another. For more information regarding these policies and procedures, see “Item 6 Performance-Based Fees and Side-by-Side Management,” above, “Item 11 - Code of Ethics, Participation or Interest in Client Transactions and Personal Trading” below, and “Item 12 - Brokerage Practices,” below. NYLIC will from time-to-time enter into agreements with an unaffiliated party under which its general accounts will provide purchase commitments for loans or other assets that are expected to be sold to market participants in syndicated or similar financing transactions. Under these purchase commitments, the general accounts may be required to purchase a loan or other asset from the unaffiliated party at an agreed price if the related transaction is not sold to market participants at or within specified economic parameters. NYLIC receives a fee for its purchase commitment. The New York Life general accounts and clients of MacKay Shields expect to purchase these loans or other assets, subject to MacKay Shields’ policies and procedures described herein. MacKay Shields determines whether a client should participate in a particular transaction based on account-specific considerations and independently of any obligation of New York Life. Nonetheless, MacKay Shields faces potential conflicts of interest in deciding to invest clients in these transactions because the investments indirectly reduce the likelihood of any purchase by the New York Life general accounts under these purchase commitments. In addition, in connection with these agreements NYLIC and certain MacKay Shields’ clients may receive preferred opportunities to participate in other transactions. Not all MacKay Shields’ clients are expected to be eligible to receive preferred opportunities to participate in such transactions. MacKay Shields has adopted procedures that are intended to mitigate the potential conflicts of interest related to transactions where the general accounts have provided a purchase commitment for other loans or other assets. Pursuant to those procedures, clients likely will not participate in some of these transactions, and some clients likely will not participate in any of these transactions, where the general accounts have provided a purchase commitment MacKay Shields and NYL Investors entered into a research sharing agreement and GFI and FII utilize a unified research team that produces research for both groups. Investment research, including issuer analyses and recommendations, is shared contemporaneously among GFI and FII pursuant to the NYLIM Shared Research Policy and related Information Barrier and MNPI Governance policies. Additionally, certain personnel of GFI have been appointed as dual-hatted officers of NYL Investors, and certain personnel of FII of NYL Investors have been appointed as dual-hatted officers of MacKay Shields, including portfolio management, research, and trading personnel. The sharing of research and the involvement of personnel across affiliated investment advisers create potential conflicts of interest. For example, affiliated advisers may form similar investment views and independently transact in the same issue or issuer, including on the same trading day or at or around the same time, which could affect market prices, liquidity, or execution outcomes, particularly in less liquid markets, and may result in certain clients receiving less favorable prices or executions than others.

Although research may be shared contemporaneously across affiliated investment advisers, investment decisions and trade implementation may occur at different times based on client mandates, market conditions, liquidity, and trading discretion, which may advantage or disadvantage certain clients relative to others. Additionally, while GFI and FII maintain separate portfolio management and trading functions and generally make independent investment and trading decisions on behalf of their respective clients, there are instances in which dual-hatted investment personnel are responsible for making investment and/or trading decisions on behalf of both GFI and FII clients. This creates a potential conflict for investment personnel to favor the clients of one adviser over the other. MacKay Shields and NYL Investors maintain policies and procedures designed to mitigate these conflicts, including information barrier controls, research sharing, trade allocation and best execution policies, and compliance oversight; however, there can be no assurance that such conflicts will not occur. For more information regarding these policies and procedures, see “Item 6 - Performance-Based Fees and Side-by-Side Management,” above, “Item 11 - Code of Ethics, Participation or Interest in Client Transactions and Personal Trading” below, and “Item 12 - Brokerage Practices,” below. Certain of our investment personnel participate in Asset Allocation Committee discussions with NYLIM portfolio managers as it relates to certain sleeves of affiliated mutual funds that are sub-advised by MacKay Shields. In these instances, the MacKay Shields’ individuals will only have access to the portfolio holdings for the fund sleeve managed by MacKay Shields and not the entire portfolio holdings. The NYLIM portfolio managers will not direct the investment management of the MacKay Shields’ portfolio sleeves, except to the extent that the Asset Allocation Committee discusses derivative overlay investments made by MacKay Shields to adjust the mutual fund’s equity or fixed income exposures. In addition, the NYLIM portfolio managers will not have access to individual securities in the MacKay Shields’ portfolio sleeves prior to their public dissemination. NYLIM portfolio managers may have access to portfolio level details such as duration, credit, sector exposure and can speak to the respective MacKay Shields’ portfolio manager on portfolio characteristics. The NYLIM portfolio managers may also have access to the derivative overlay investments made by MacKay Shields, such as futures, options, forwards and swaps, so long as the underlying reference asset is, for example, a broadbased index or U.S. Treasuries. The NYLIM portfolio managers will not have access to derivatives where the underlying is a narrow-based index or on single securities. The NYLIM portfolio managers’ personal trading is monitored daily against the NYLIM Holdings and MacKay Shields’ trading blotters. NYL Investments UK LLP (“NYLI UK”) is an affiliate of MacKay Shields and is headquartered in London, United Kingdom. NYLI UK is authorized and regulated as an investment manager under the UK Markets in Financial Instruments Directive with the UK Financial Conduct Authority. NYLI UK employs investment personnel focused on managing emerging market debt assets who have been appointed as dual-hatted officers of MacKay Shields to provide portfolio management, research, trading and related services to certain clients of MacKay Shields. Additionally, MacKay Shields has delegated investment advisory services to NYLI UK for certain client accounts, and NYLI UK’s investment personnel provide investment research services, including investment recommendations, to MacKay Shields’ investment personnel. MacKay Shields has shared services arrangements in place with NYLI UK and NYL Investments Europe Limited (“NYLI Europe”). NYLI Europe is an affiliate of Mackay Shields, that is headquartered in Dublin, Ireland and is authorized and regulated as an investment manager and Alternative Investment Fund Manager under the European Union’s Alternative Investment Fund Manager Directive with the Central Bank of Ireland. Pursuant to these shared services agreements, MacKay Shields provides support services including but not limited to, technology, finance, legal and compliance, operations, and human resources, to NYLI Europe and NYLI UK. Affiliated Institutional Distribution Team MacKay Shields, as well as certain of its affiliated advisers, has entered into services agreements with NYLIM and NYLIFE Distributors for the provision of sales and marketing support services. Pursuant to the agreements, NYLIM provides administrative agent, referral, sales, and marketing support services, and NYLIFE Distributors provides distribution services, with respect to certain pooled investment vehicles and managed accounts managed by MacKay Shields. Such services include introducing prospective investors to affiliated investment

advisers and providing written materials about MacKay Shields or an investment product. Employees of NYLIM comprise an institutional distribution team that renders such services, and certain personnel of NYLIM have been dual hatted to Mackay Shields in order to provide the services. MacKay Shields provides compensation to NYLIM for the provision of its services, which creates a conflict of interest to the extent that NYLIM has a financial incentive to recommend a MacKay Shields investment strategy or product that results in additional compensation to NYLIM. Any applicable conflict of interest is disclosed if required by Rule 206(4)1 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Marketing Rule”), as described below. Affiliated Broker-Dealers Some of our employees, including some of our senior officers, are registered with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) as representatives and principals of our affiliate NYLIFE Distributors, which, like MacKay Shields, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of NYLIM Holdings. NYLIFE Distributors is registered as a brokerdealer with the SEC. Registered representatives of NYLIFE Distributors, who may be employees of our Firm or our affiliates, may:

Promote the sale of various SEC-registered investment companies, such as, but not limited to, NYLI Funds and ETFs, to registered representatives of other broker-dealers, who may recommend that their clients purchase these products;

Promote the sale of investment funds not registered with the SEC sponsored by MacKay Shields or one or more of our affiliates; and

Assist NYLIM in making presentations to investment consultants with respect to our sub-advisory services for wrap fee programs for which NYLIM provides advisory services.

Registered representatives of NYLIFE Distributors, who may be employees of our Firm or our affiliates, may sell interests in commingled investment vehicles not registered with the SEC (i.e., private funds) that we or our affiliates manage or sub-advise. The sale of interests in these private funds by employees that are registered representatives of NYLIFE Distributors, is a factor that is considered in determining their annual compensation. We do not execute transactions on behalf of our client accounts with affiliated brokers. Other Arrangements with Affiliates From time-to-time, we enter into agreements with our affiliated investment advisers or related persons by which the affiliated investment adviser or related person utilizes the services of one or more of our employees and may pay a fee to us, or we utilize the services of one or more employees of an affiliated investment adviser or related person and may pay a fee to the affiliated investment adviser or related person. In these arrangements, the employee is subject to our supervision and supervision by the affiliated investment adviser or related person. We have entered into, and in the future may enter into arrangements with our affiliates to recommend clients or investors to each other. If we pay a cash fee to anyone for soliciting clients or investors in private funds on our behalf (such persons, “promoters”) or if we receive a cash fee from another investment adviser for recommending clients to it, we comply with the requirements of the Marketing Rule to the extent that they apply. Subject to certain exemptions, the Marketing Rule requires a written agreement between the investment adviser and the promoter and that the promoter provide clear and prominent disclosures concerning the identity of the promoter, the nature of the compensation and applicable conflicts of interests to the potential client at the time that the solicitation is made. As required by the Marketing Rule, except for uncompensated or “de minimis” compensation (as defined in the Marketing Rule) arrangements, we will not engage a promoter if that person has been subject to securities regulatory or criminal sanctions that meet the definition of a disqualifying event under the Marketing Rule within the preceding ten years. Please see “Item 14 - Client Referrals and Other Compensation,” below.

Employees are also required to adhere to New York Life’s Integrity – Standards of Business Conduct Policy, conflicts of interest, MNPI and information barriers, electronic communications and social media, gifts and entertainment, personal political contributions, foreign corrupt practices, and selective disclosure of portfolio holdings. While we permit our employees to engage in personal securities transactions, we recognize that these transactions raise potential conflicts of interests in certain circumstances. This is particularly true when they involve securities owned by, or considered for purchase or sale for, a client account. We address potential conflicts of interests in our Code by requiring that, with regard to investments and investment opportunities, our employees’ first obligation is to our clients. Our Code requires that all of our employees adhere to the highest duty of trust and fair dealing. All employees: (i) must conduct their personal securities transactions in a manner that does not interfere with any client’s portfolio transactions, or take inappropriate advantage of an employee’s relationship with a client; (ii) may not trade while in possession of MNPI; (iii) may not engage in short-term trading (the purchase and sale or sale and purchase within 30 days) of any mutual fund advised or sub-advised by us or an affiliated adviser; and (iv) must certify annually to compliance with the Code and related policies. Some provisions of our Code, particularly with respect to personal trading, apply only to Access Persons and Investment Personnel. Access Persons are defined as officers or directors of MacKay Shields, or employees who have access to non-public information regarding any client’s purchase or sale of securities, or who have non-public information regarding the portfolio holdings of any client account that we advise. Investment Personnel are defined as employees who, in connection with their regular functions, participate in making recommendations regarding the purchase or sale of securities for client accounts (i.e., portfolio managers, traders and analysts). Access Persons and Investment Personnel are required to adhere to certain guidelines and restrictions with respect to personal trading. A copy of our Code is available to clients and prospective clients upon request. Material Non-Public Information/Information Barrier MacKay Shields and certain affiliates may receive material non-public information (“MNPI”) under varying circumstances (for example, in connection with private transactions, creditor or lending activities, or confidentiality arrangements). MacKay Shields and its affiliates maintain policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent the misuse of MNPI, including information barriers designed to limit the dissemination of MNPI and to manage trading-related issues between private markets investment personnel (“Private Investment Teams”) and public markets investment personnel (“Public Investment Teams”). As a result of these information barriers and related controls such as restricted lists and walling-off procedures where appropriate, the Public Investment Teams generally do not have access to MNPI held by the Private Investment Teams, and the Private Investment Teams generally do not have access to MNPI held by the Public Investment Teams. Subject to applicable legal, contractual, and confidentiality restrictions, these teams may share certain general information that does not constitute MNPI, such as broad market, macroeconomic, sector, or industry observations, and may communicate as needed for client reporting, enterprise risk monitoring, and operational matters. However, MNPI is generally not shared across these teams, and issueror security-specific information generally is not discussed. These controls may restrict the ability of MacKay Shields, its affiliates, or their personnel to transact in certain securities or investments for some accounts for

periods of time, and MNPI may not be shared across teams even if it could be beneficial to other accounts. Additionally, MacKay Shields and our affiliates also maintain policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent the misuse of MNPI in connection with transactions when certain personnel of NYLIC or its affiliates receive information that may constitute MNPI. If we are in possession of MNPI, we are not obligated and may not be permitted to communicate any such information to or for the benefit of our clients or disclose that we are restricted from trading in a particular security or otherwise to act on the basis of any such information in providing services to clients. We may also from time-to-time be subject to limitations on trading in the securities of certain issuers as a result of our clients’ holdings or those of our affiliates and their clients. From time-to-time our investment personnel may serve on the board of directors, a creditors’ committee, a bondholders’ committee, or similar group associated with an issuer whose securities or other instruments are held in client accounts. This is typically the result of the issuer engaging in a potential refinancing transaction, bankruptcy filing, or reorganization proceeding. MacKay Shields, individually as investment adviser or with other investment advisers or bondholders, may also correspond and enter into discussions and negotiations with issuers, trustees, sponsors, advisors, and/or other parties relating to defaults and alleged defaults by issuers and other parties under the indenture agreements or other documents governing investments held by our clients. As a member of such a committee or engaging in such discussions or negotiations, or as a result of investing in certain securities or assets, we may acquire material non-public information, which may result in restrictions on trading. Investment professionals with material non-public information are prohibited from acting on the basis of any such information in providing services to clients. We may also refrain from receiving material non-public information or from serving on a board of directors, creditors’ committee or bondholders’ committee or engaging in such discussions or negotiations in order to avoid restrictions on trading in other securities of the same issuer, even if such material non-public information might otherwise be relevant to our investment decisions. Participation or Interests in Client Transactions Our employees, their immediate family members, and our affiliates may own and transact in securities that we purchase or sell for our clients, or various instruments of the same issuer. The investments in such issuers could have different rights, for example in the event of a default or restructuring on the part of the issuer, or as a result of a bankruptcy proceeding. These securities include long-term and short-term debt and equity and private securities, and other instruments such as bank loans. The investment strategy for certain clients includes transacting in different securities of the same issuer, different tranches of the same issue or the same issue denominated in different currencies, in the client account. We may also make investments for our clients in transactions where the NYLIC general accounts have material and different economic interests. We may purchase a security for one client and sell the same security for another client. Potential conflicts between client accounts are addressed through our procedures for allocating portfolio transactions and investment opportunities, as described under “Item 12 - Brokerage Practices,” below. In the course of performing investment management services, we may also purchase or sell for our clients’ securities or other investment instruments in which other clients, our affiliates, or the clients of our affiliates have a material financial interest. These practices create conflicts of interest relating to the allocation of limited investment opportunities between affiliated and unaffiliated accounts, allocation of investment opportunities to accounts that pay a performance fee, using information regarding transactions in affiliated accounts to benefit other accounts and placing trades for certain accounts before or after trades for other accounts to take advantage of (or avoid) market impact. It is our policy not to favor the interest of one client over another. We address the conflicts of interest created by management of affiliated and unaffiliated accounts by having a Trade Allocation Policy designed so that trades are allocated among client accounts in a fair and reasonable manner and that no one client account will receive over time preferential treatment over another. In addition, it is our policy that we will not permit cross trades between clients unless the portfolio manager instructing the trade deems it in the best interest

of both clients at the time and obtains advance approval of the transaction from our Compliance Department and, to the extent applicable, the transaction satisfies Rule 206(3)-2 under the Advisers Act. See “Item 6 Performance-Based Fees and Side-By-Side Management,” above and “Item 12 - Brokerage Practices,” below. MacKay Shields has adopted procedures that are intended to mitigate the potential conflicts of interest related to transactions where the general accounts have provided a purchase commitment for loans or other assets. Pursuant to those procedures, clients likely will not participate in some of these transactions, and some clients likely will not participate in any of these transactions, where the general accounts have provided a purchase commitment. MacKay Shiels and its affiliated have established policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent the misuse of MNPI, including information barriers designed to limit the dissemination of MNPI and to manage trading-related issues between Private Investment Teams and Public Investment Teams. In the event such information is shared, appropriate controls are placed around the information in order to limit any potential conflicts of interest. The information barrier also limits the dissemination of MNPI. See “Item 10 - Other Financial Industry Activities and Affiliations,” above. Our employees or their immediate family members may personally invest in SEC-registered investment companies and investment funds not registered with the SEC that are managed by the Firm. These investments pose a risk that employees with influence over investment decisions will favor the funds in which they have a personal interest. However, we believe that our Code of Ethics, Trade Allocation Policy, and MNPI Governance Policy mitigate these risks. We also believe that employee investments in the funds align the interests of our Firm and our employees with those of our clients. Contemporaneous Trading and Contrary Investment Positions We maintain independently managed investment teams, which from time-to-time will compete with each other for the same investment opportunities and/or take positions that are counter to one another. MacKay Shields engages in transactions and investment strategies for certain clients that differ from the transactions and strategies executed on behalf of other clients. At times, two or more of MacKay Shields’ investment teams jointly manage the assets of a single client portfolio (“Crossover Mandate”). In such instances, the asset allocation decisions will be discussed amongst the various investment teams, but the day-to-day investment decision-making process will typically be made independently by each team for the portion of the Crossover Mandate that team is responsible for managing. MacKay Shields invests in all segments of the capital structure on behalf of clients and is not precluded from investing in instruments of a company held in another client account, even if such positions may be adverse to one another. MacKay Shields’ client accounts have held, and it is expected that in the future they will at times hold, different investments of the same issuer that have different priorities. These investments create conflicts of interest, particularly because MacKay Shields can take certain actions for clients that can have an adverse effect on other clients (e.g., in connection with refinancing, restructuring, or reorganization situations). For example, certain MacKay Shields clients hold instruments that are senior or subordinated relative to instruments of the same issuer held by other clients in the same or another strategy. This presents a conflict of interest because any action that the portfolio managers of one strategy were to take on behalf of the issuer’s senior instrument, for instance, could have an adverse effect on the issuer’s junior instrument held by clients of another investment strategy, and vice versa, particularly in distressed or default situations. To the extent MacKay Shields or any of its employees were to serve on a formal or informal creditor or similar committee on behalf of a client, such conflicts of interest may be exacerbated. MacKay Shields also acts as investment adviser to clients that have issued securities and other instruments, and MacKay Shields may enter into similar investment advisory relationships in the future. Such companies may be investors in collective investment vehicles sponsored or managed by MacKay Shields or its affiliates. MacKay Shields has, and in the future, it is expected that the Firm will, purchase, on behalf of its clients, instruments issued by such companies. However, MacKay Shields is not obligated to purchase or sell or

recommend for purchase or sale for any client any security or other asset that we and our employees and affiliates may purchase or sell for their own accounts or for the account of any client. Additionally, MacKay Shields may make investments for certain clients that we conclude are inappropriate for other clients. For instance, clients within one investment strategy may take short positions in the debt or equity instruments of certain issuers, while at the same time those instruments or other instruments of that issuer are acquired or held long by clients in another investment strategy or within the same strategy. Accounts may have the same, similar or different investment objectives from one another. The fact that an account will pursue many of the same investment and trading strategies as certain other accounts is likely to have beneficial effects on such other accounts. For example, when multiple accounts establish the same or similar positions, the existence of the accounts’ positions could have a beneficial impact on pricing and possibly trading in the relevant market. Such benefits are likely to enhance the value and perhaps the liquidity of other accounts and, consequently, increase the compensation earned by MacKay Shields from such other accounts. Thus, there will be conflicts of interest inherent in managing the multiple accounts simultaneously. Cross Transactions We have adopted a policy to provide guidance and direction when we engage in cross trades for any of our client accounts. All cross transactions (i.e., selling a security from one client account to another client account) will be effected in the best interest of each participating client, in accordance with applicable regulations and consistent with our duty to obtain best execution. The appropriateness of a cross transaction will be based on various factors, particularly the type of accounts involved. In certain instances, prior consent must be obtained from the client in writing. Cross trades may be executed for different clients on the same or a different day on which we trade in the same investment for other clients. To the extent that this occurs, it could give rise to a conflict of interest because clients acquiring securities through a cross trade would typically pay lower execution costs than clients purchasing these instruments through a broker-dealer and clients disposing securities through a cross trade would typically receive higher execution proceeds than clients disposing of these instruments through a broker-dealer. When entering into cross transactions we require, among other things, that the transaction be for no consideration other than cash payments against prompt delivery of the security and is effected at the independent market price of the security determined in accordance with applicable methodology. We may enter into cross transactions involving one or more ERISA accounts only when prior written consent from the plan fiduciary is received, and then only in accordance with applicable law and our written policies. We may enter into cross transactions for registered investment companies if the transactions comply with the exemption provided under Rule 17a-7 of the Investment Company Act of 1940, which sets forth the conditions that must be met. Differing Terms of Investment Products MacKay Shields’ investment strategies are available through a variety of investment products, including, without limitation, separately managed accounts, private funds, mutual funds, and ETFs. Given the different structures of these products, certain clients are subject to terms and conditions that are materially different or more advantageous than available under different products. For example, mutual funds offer investors the ability to redeem from the fund daily, while private funds typically offer less frequent liquidity. Similarly, a client with a separately managed account will have more transparency regarding the positions held in its account than would be available to an investor in a collective investment vehicle. Further, separately managed account clients have the ability to terminate their investment management agreement with little or no notice (subject to the terms of the investment advisory agreement or similar agreement). As a result of these differing liquidity and other terms, MacKay Shields may acquire and/or dispose of investments for a client either prior to or subsequent to the acquisition and/or disposition of the same or similar securities held by another client. In certain circumstances, purchases or sales of securities by one client could adversely affect the value of the same securities held in another client’s portfolio. In addition, MacKay Shields has caused, and expects that in the future it will cause, certain clients to invest in

opportunities with different levels of concentration or on different terms than that to which other clients invest in the same securities. These differences could lead to substantially different investment outcomes among clients investing in the same securities. We seek to tailor our investment advisory services to meet each client’s investment objective, constraints and investment guidelines, and MacKay Shields’ judgments with respect to a particular client will at times differ from its judgments for other clients, even when such clients pursue similar investment strategies. Non-Exclusive Services MacKay Shields’ services to each client are not exclusive. Our employees and affiliates may effect transactions for their own accounts and for the accounts of other clients that differ materially from the advice given, or the time or nature of action taken, with respect to a particular client account. Also, it may not always be possible for the same investment positions to be taken or liquidated at the same time or at the same price. Additionally, the nature of managing accounts for multiple clients creates a conflict of interest with regard to time available to serve clients. MacKay Shields and its officers and/or employees will devote as much of their time to the activities of each client as they deem necessary and appropriate. However, a conflict of interest exists as different clients may often be in competition for the time and effort of MacKay Shields and its officers and/or employees. MacKay Shields’ clients should be aware that although MacKay Shields strives to identify and mitigate all conflicts of interest and seeks to treat its clients in a fair and reasonable manner consistent with its fiduciary duties, there may be times when conflicts of interest are not resolved in a manner favorable to a specific client. Accordingly, MacKay Shields conducts an annual review of its business practices to identify those areas that might pose a conflict of interest between MacKay Shields and its clients. MacKay Shields’ Legal and Compliance Departments endeavor to ensure that all relevant disclosures concerning conflicts of interest are included in this Brochure.

The broker-dealer’s compensation, which includes net prices paid or received, negotiated commission rates available and other current transaction costs (e.g., brokerage commission or a mark-up or markdown). When we evaluate the broker-dealer’s compensation, we consider its ability to execute a security transaction in the desired volume, the security price or the spread between the bid and ask prices of the security (fixed income instruments), and the size of a particular security order.

The broker-dealer’s ability to provide access to securities in underwritten offerings and in the secondary market, its willingness to commit its own capital, its trading expertise and market knowledge, and the nature and frequency of its coverage in terms of providing market outlook, quotes on specific securities and sector research.

The broker-dealer’s block trading and block positioning capabilities and ability to execute difficult or complex transactions.

The broker-dealer’s responsiveness to our Portfolio Managers, Traders, and investment operations personnel.

The nature of the research created or developed by the broker-dealer, which is called “proprietary research” – except where the research results in a mark-up or mark-down of a fixed income security.

The broker-dealer’s access to research that the broker-dealer itself has not created or developed, which is called “third-party research.”

The value and quality of the research and other products and services other than brokerage services that we receive from the broker-dealer or that the broker-dealer pays for (either by cash payments or commission).

Regulatory, legal and macro-economic matters that may affect the broker-dealer.

When selecting broker-dealers to execute transactions, we seek the best overall execution. In our experience, neither the lowest transaction cost nor the most expeditious execution necessarily correlates to the best trade for the client. In foreign markets, including those where we regularly purchase and sell securities for clients, commissions and other transaction costs are often higher than those charged in the United States. In addition, we may not have the ability to negotiate commissions in some of these markets. You should also note that services associated with foreign investing, including, but not limited to, custody and administration, are generally more expensive than in the United States. Certain investment professionals serve in a dual role and will act in a portfolio manager and trader capacity. In these instances, the same individual will regularly make the investment decision, create the order in the trade order management system, and execute the order. We have separate investment teams, and certain investment teams compete with each other for the same or similar investment opportunities. In most instances, the broker-dealer will determine the allocation to each team. Where investment opportunities in certain securities and asset classes are limited, a client may not receive an allocation or as large an allocation in respect of limited investment opportunities as it might otherwise receive in the absence of such competition. This can be particularly acute if the market for the securities is illiquid or the supply limited. Our traders typically do business with broker-dealers who are listed as currently approved brokers-dealers, except where clients have limited or designated specific broker-dealers by appropriate language and such change has been approved by our Firm’s Chief Compliance Officer or the General Counsel, or their designee. There may be instances when an investment team may request to transact with a broker-dealer not currently approved. In these instances, the Chief Compliance Officer, the General Counsel, or their designee may grant an exception, subject to certain conditions being met. We typically effect transactions in over‐the‐counter (“OTC”) instruments directly with principals or market makers by paying a mark‐up within the spread of the bid and ask prices of the security and without incurring a commission charge. In addition, we may affect transactions in OTC securities on an agency basis when liquidity permits. The purchase price of an OTC security acquired in an agency transaction could include compensation to the broker‐dealer in the form of a mark‐up, relative to the broker‐dealer’s original cost in addition to a commission. MacKay Shields has policies and procedures in place to limit and monitor gifts and entertainment received from third parties, including broker‐dealers that do business with MacKay Shields or wish to do business with MacKay Shields. MacKay Shields’ Brokerage Committee routinely reviews its broker‐dealers and its efforts to seek best execution in light of current market circumstances and other available information. Soft Dollar Benefits, Proprietary Research MacKay Shields does not have any soft dollar arrangements. MacKay Shields does, however, receive, without cost and unrelated to the execution of transactions, a broad range of research services from brokers we transact with, including information on the economy, industries, securities and individual companies,

statistical information, market data, complimentary attendance at industry conference and events, access to company management, pricing and appraisal services, credit analysis, risk measurement analysis, performance analysis and other information that may affect the economy and/or security prices. We may also pay brokers and their affiliates for certain specialized data and services, such as benchmark information, that are also unrelated to the execution of securities transactions. The research, information and services furnished by these brokers are useful in varying degrees and may be used in servicing our clients. No formula has been established for the allocation of business to such brokers. MacKay Shields consults with paid (or unpaid) industry experts as part of the Firm’s research process. Brokerdealers may also arrange for such meetings. Procedures are in place to monitor the conflicts associated with using such services. MacKay Shields receives a benefit in connection with the research provided by certain broker-dealers because we do not have to produce or pay for the research ourselves. As a result, we may have an incentive to select or recommend a broker-dealer based on our interest in receiving the research, rather than on our clients’ interest in receiving the most favorable execution of trades. In general, proprietary research furnished by broker-dealers through which we trade is used for the benefit of our clients as a group and not solely or necessarily in all cases for the benefit of the particular client whose trades are handled by the broker-dealer who provides such services. We review the reasonableness of commission and other transaction costs incurred by our clients in light of the facts and circumstances we deem relevant from time-to-time, including information furnished by our traders. Proprietary research that results in a mark-up or mark-down of a fixed income security will not be a factor considered when seeking to execute a transaction with a broker-dealer. Brokerage for Client Referrals MacKay Shields has formal and/or informal arrangements in place with brokers and/or affiliates of brokers who market our investment strategies and/or products or otherwise make our investment strategies and/or products available to their respective clients. If we pay a cash fee to anyone for soliciting clients or investors in private funds on our behalf (such persons, “promoters”), we comply with the requirements of Marketing Rule, to the extent that they apply. In certain circumstances, MacKay Shields or our clients compensate these brokers or their affiliates in connection with these arrangements (including, for example, a placement agent fee). In selecting or recommending broker-dealers or other counterparties with whom to execute client transactions, we do not consider a broker-dealer or counterparty’s referral of clients to us or to investment funds that we, our related persons or third parties, sponsor or manage. Nonetheless, this practice creates a conflict of interest because we have an incentive to select or recommend a broker based on our interest in receiving client referrals. The allocation of transactions to brokers who (or that have affiliates who) market or otherwise make our investment strategies or products available to their clients is subject at all times to our obligation to obtain best execution. Directed Brokerage At a client’s request, we may direct trades to broker-dealers or other counterparties, including Futures Commission Merchants. In return for the client’s commissions on the transactions, the broker typically provides services directly to the client or pays for certain expenses of the client. A client may also direct us to execute transactions to a specified broker to generate broker commissions in return for which the broker “refunds” a portion of the commission directly back to the client (i.e., “Commission Recapture”). We will not execute directed brokerage transactions on behalf of any client account without written authorization from the client. For all ERISA accounts, these arrangements must be for the “exclusive benefit” of the account directing such brokerage and may not benefit a plan fiduciary. The ERISA plan may be rebated in cash or have the broker pay certain administrative expenses of the plan. We retain the right to refuse to engage in a directed brokerage arrangement where the personnel involved in the management of such client account(s) have concerns about obtaining best execution. It is important to note that when we satisfy a client’s request to direct brokerage, we may not be able to achieve best execution for that client. Clients who direct us to execute their trades with, or restrict our ability to execute

their trades with, certain broker-dealers or counterparties may lose the benefit of more favorable commission rates or more favorable executions that may be obtained, for example, when we bunch or aggregate client orders. In addition, there may be times when trading with a directed broker-dealer or counterparty occurs before or after we have completed the execution of other transactions in that security for other clients. Directing brokerage may cost clients more money. A directed trade may be executed directly with the broker-dealer or counterparty or may be “stepped out” to that broker-dealer or counterparty. In a step-out transaction, we bunch client-directed brokerage accounts with non-directed brokerage accounts and request that the executing broker allocate a portion of the transaction to the directed broker. In that event, the broker-dealer providing execution services would differ from a particular client’s directed broker-dealer or counterparty. Certain clients may execute trades independently through their broker-dealers or counterparties. Although cost is only one component of best execution analysis, many directed brokerage accounts pay effective rates or fees that are higher than client accounts that do not have directed brokerage arrangements. In these instances, a client may have an arrangement with the broker-dealer or counterparty to receive a benefit that the client believes justifies the higher expenses. Wrap Fee Programs For clients that invest through wrap fee programs, the wrap fee charged by the sponsor firm covers trade and execution services. As a result, the sponsor and client typically request that transactions for clients’ accounts be executed by the sponsor of the wrap fee program (or its affiliate) or a broker-dealer designated by the sponsor firm. In the event that the sponsor or designated broker-dealer cannot provide “best execution” for a given transaction, we, as sub-adviser for the wrap fee program, have the discretion to trade away (that is, trade with a different broker-dealer), and the client may incur a commission or other transaction cost. As the majority of transactions in the wrap fee programs are fixed income securities that trade over-the-counter, there are no additional mark-ups or commissions on these transactions beyond the customary structure of the bid/offer prices and we believe these transactions are executed on behalf of these clients in such a manner that the client’s total cost or proceeds in each transaction was the most favorable under the circumstances. It should be noted that in seeking to maintain best execution on behalf of our clients, we may consider factors beyond simply price, commission rates or spreads, including the full range and quality of a broker’s services in placing brokerage. These factors might include, among other things, the value of research provided, execution capability, willingness to commit capital, financial responsibility, and responsiveness. We may execute trades for other clients with similar strategies prior to placing trades with wrap sponsors. In addition, we may not conduct transactions on behalf of these clients as frequently as we do on behalf of other clients due to minimum size order requirements and other factors. Derivatives Certain derivatives transactions (including, but not limited to, futures, forward settling mortgage transactions, and swaps) require that clients have proper agreements in place with counterparties. Separately managed account clients typically have their own agreements in place to allow MacKay Shields to transact in such derivatives. However, MacKay Shields has established master agreements with counterparties pursuant to which transactions in certain derivatives may be placed on behalf of commingled investment vehicles sponsored by MacKay Shields or other clients who approve such arrangements and satisfy the account opening process of MacKay Shields and the applicable counterparty. For derivative transactions that require the posting of initial and/or variation margin (including, but not limited to, futures, forward settling mortgage transactions, and swaps), clients will be required to wire cash or other eligible assets (in some cases as often as daily) to the account specified by such counterparties, which will likely result in your custodian charging you a fee for that service. Margin limits are closely monitored by MacKay Shields to ensure that a transaction does not experience a default and the immediate closing-out of the position by a counterparty. Where margin is posted to your account by a counterparty, interest expense may accrue and in such cases you will be required to pay interest on such margin. In all cases where margin exists with a counterparty in your favor, MacKay

Shields will make determinations on your behalf as to whether to draw down any margin, as well as the timing and the amount of such margin to be drawn down. The result is that cash management will be even more of an important aspect of portfolio management and that cash holdings may become a larger part of a client’s portfolio in order to meet any initial margin requirements and variation margin calls. Certain counterparties may impose a number of important terms and conditions, such as their ability to apply or transfer funds in your margin account(s) to other accounts that you may maintain with such counterparty or its affiliates to reduce any deficit balance or other obligation that you may owe to such parties. Additionally, you may be required to produce certifications and other materials, such as financial statements, on a regular basis to certain counterparties in order to maintain your account. Other counterparties may impose termination and/or default triggers based on certain conditions or events. Your collateral may be commingled by a counterparty with the collateral of other customers of the counterparty. In the event of insolvency or bankruptcy of a counterparty, the extent to which you may recover your collateral may be governed by specified legislation or local rules. The appropriate use of derivatives within a portfolio is determined by the respective investment team in the execution of their portfolio construction process. The investment teams assess whether the derivatives can be used effectively and efficiently in comparison with the alternatives available as well as the use of derivatives in relation to the other investments within the portfolio. If permitted by a client’s investment guidelines, currency spot and forward contracts may be used in the management of portfolios. Currency hedges will be implemented within a reasonable period of time, generally within a day or two of any new purchases of securities that are required to be currency hedged. In general, hedge ratios are maintained within a predetermined range determined by MacKay Shields and rebalanced when this ratio moves beyond that range, unless a client has more specific requirements. In the event a portfolio’s hedge ratio exceeds the thresholds, the hedge will be adjusted within a reasonable period of time. Currency Forwards may also be used to gain exposure to a certain currency, in line with a client’s investment guidelines and objectives. If permitted by a client’s investment guidelines and provided that proper agreements are in place with futures commission merchants, Treasury futures (long or short) may be utilized. Other derivatives, such as credit default swaps, interest rate swaps and forward settling mortgage transactions, may be used provided that their use is permitted by a client’s investment guidelines and proper agreements are in place. Aggregating and Allocating Trades It is our policy that all client accounts will be treated fairly and no one client account will receive over time preferential treatment over another. Our policy prohibits any MacKay Shields employee from allocating or reallocating investments to enhance the performance of one account over another or to favor any affiliated account or any other account in which an employee has any interest. MacKay Shields will not receive any additional compensation or remuneration as a result of aggregating or bunching orders. Individual investment advice and treatment will be accorded to each advisory or sub-advisory account. Orders within an investment team will typically be aggregated or bunched to reduce the costs of the transactions. Orders are typically not aggregated across investment teams even though there may be orders by separate investment teams to execute the same instrument on the same trading day; provided, however, that orders for the same instrument are typically aggregated across investment teams that are supported by a shared trading desk. It is the investment team’s responsibility to determine whether aggregation is appropriate. For the avoidance of doubt, MacKay Shields will not aggregate transactions if it believes that such an aggregation is inconsistent with its duty to seek best execution for its clients or is inconsistent with the terms of MacKay Shields’ agreement with each client for which trades are being aggregated. Aggregated orders are typically allocated among accounts based upon an average price, with all other transaction costs, if any, shared among the accounts on a fair and reasonable basis. Clients that instruct us to, or restrict our ability to execute transactions with a certain broker dealer, may be excluded from certain aggregated orders because of such directed-brokerage arrangements; for additional information, see the section “Directed Brokerage” above.

As a general practice, MacKay will seek to utilize the Firm’s trade order management system in selecting the participating client accounts prior to entering an aggregated order. However, pre-allocating fixed income trades based on predetermined allocation amounts is not feasible or practicable for all instances given the nature of their respective markets and client requirements, or the information limitations specific to a deal. In those cases, an allocation will be made promptly following execution but generally no later than the end of the trading day. Such allocation will be based upon the criteria noted below and will not be based on the performance of the transaction nor unfairly discriminate against or advantage one account over another over time. When determining which accounts will participate in a trade, we will consider various criteria which may include, but are not limited to: (i) client cash limitations; (ii) actual and anticipated or potential account inflows and outflows; (iii) duration and/or average maturity; (iv) credit ratings and anticipated credit ratings; (v) account size, deal size, trade lots; (vi) processing costs; (vii) existing exposure to an issuer or industry type, and other concentration limits; (viii) specific investment objectives, investment guidelines and anticipated guidelines changes; (ix) regulatory requirements and/or tax considerations; (x) borrowing capacity; and (xi) other practical limitations. If the order is partially filled, it will typically be allocated pro-rata based on the target allocation methodology, subject to the considerations described in the preceding sentence, unless that would be impractical. We cannot ensure that in every instance an investment will be allocated on a pro-rata basis, and differences may occur due to the factors mentioned above. It is our goal to provide individualized treatment and customized solutions to our clients. There are conditions under which a portfolio manager and/or trader is permitted to: (i) allocate a transaction only to certain of the accounts eligible to participate; (ii) allocate a larger or smaller portion of a transaction to an account or group of accounts than to other accounts participating in the transaction; or (iii) exclude certain accounts from participating in a transaction that may be suitable for the account(s). Those conditions include, but are not limited to, the following:

Odd lots “De Minimis” quantity - Whenever an allocation would cause an account to receive either an odd lot or an amount that is uneconomical, it need not participate in an allocation. A de minimis amount that does not disadvantage, benefit, nor favor any account over another will be established by each investment area.

Cash availability - The portfolio manager may consider changes in cash flow or cash positions as a basis for allocating investments. If there is an insufficient amount of cash for an account, or if an account is (or it is anticipated that it shortly will be) experiencing cash outflow, then it may not participate or receive a full pro-rata distribution. Conversely, accounts receiving or expected to receive meaningful inflows may receive greater allocations, particularly in the case of “ramp-up” periods, when a portfolio receives a material sum of cash to invest.

Specialized Accounts - An account with an investment mandate, benchmark, style, or model that emphasizes investment in a particular category of securities may have priority over other client accounts for that category of securities. For example, portfolios focusing on certain mandates may have priority as to investment opportunities over other accounts that do not focus on that category of security.

Investment Restrictions/Guidelines - Certain accounts may have client restrictions, regulatory restrictions, tax considerations, contractual obligations, diversification considerations, or internal exposure limit constraints that could prohibit or limit their ability to participate in an allocation.

Investment Weighting - Certain accounts may or may not participate in an allocation because of their current weightings in a particular issuer, industry or asset class. In addition, accounts that are managed in a similar manner may or may not participate in an allocation in order to provide similar size exposure to investments.

Issue or Issuer Characteristics - Certain accounts may or may not participate in an allocation because of the issue or issuer’s duration and/or average maturity, credit ratings and/or anticipated credit ratings, or deal size.

Deal Sponsor Considerations - Certain accounts may or may not participate in an allocation because of deal sponsor discretionary considerations, such as a preference for certain investor profiles.

Term Lifecycle of Account - Certain accounts may or may not participate in an allocation because of the term lifecycle of the account portfolio or vintage year.

The primary responsibility to oversee that all orders are properly allocated in accordance with our Trade Allocation Policy is with each investment team’s portfolio managers. Additionally, MacKay Shields’ Compliance Department monitors compliance with the Trade Allocation Policy by periodically conducting reviews of a sample of trades to confirm these have been allocated on a fair and reasonable basis and by comparing the performance of accounts that have substantially similar investment strategies (e.g., accounts within the same performance composite) to determine whether variations in performance are due to investment factors such as those listed above and not attributable to preferential treatment. We have independently managed investment teams investing in the same general market that may maintain procedures applied independently of the other. In most instances, the broker-dealer selling securities to these investment teams will determine the allocation to each team. Although transactions in the same security may take place in accounts across different investment teams, controls are in place to prevent members of an investment team from viewing orders entered by other investment teams; provided, however, that investment teams supported by a shared trading desk may have shared access to trading blotters. Trade Errors We have a policy regarding the correction of trade errors. In the event of an error, we attempt to identify, research and correct the error as soon as practicable. We will make a client whole for any losses resulting from a trade error that we have caused. MacKay Shields is not, however, responsible for losses associated with errors of other third parties, including third-party brokers and custodians. If an error results in a gain, the gain will remain in the client’s account. We may net gains and losses within a client’s account arising from the same or related trade error(s). MacKay Shields has a conflict of interest when determining how to resolve a trade error because we would be required to reimburse a client for any losses resulting from our error. MacKay Shields will seek to resolve each trade error in a manner it considers appropriate and consistent with its fiduciary duties.

We have a front-end and back-end compliance system that has automated controls to help review investment transactions to confirm they are made in accordance with client investment mandates. We have also developed exception reports to assist in performing next day reviews. Separately managed account clients (and/or their designated agent) typically receive a comprehensive quarterly reporting package that typically includes, but is not limited to, performance and comparative benchmark returns, a detailed summary of transactions and holdings, and market and portfolio commentary. Upon request, separately managed account clients may receive similar reporting packages on a monthly basis. Customized reports may also be provided upon request. We conduct periodic meetings with clients of separately managed accounts (or their designated agent), as well as advisers of registered and non-registered investment funds for which we act as sub-adviser, to discuss

the market, portfolio(s), and outlook. In general, at least one member of the investment team and one member of the client group participate in these meetings. We also may report to the advisors and/or boards of the investment funds we advise, which may include a variety of materials concerning the portfolios, including the materials made available to fund investors. We review client portfolios no less frequently than monthly for the purpose of reconciling our records of our clients’ account holdings with those of their custodian banks. In addition, on a daily or weekly basis, we review client accounts for purposes of reconciling cash balances.

We will not charge any client any other amount for the purpose of offsetting our cost of obtaining an account through a promoter. For certain of our employees referring client accounts to us or our affiliates is a factor that is considered in determining their annual compensation. This creates a conflict of interest as certain employees could have an incentive to recommend or use the investment services or products of our affiliates over third parties that do not pay us fees for recommending their products and services. We may also pay our affiliates compensation for introducing client accounts to us or providing services relating to our clients, which compensation does not increase the advisory fees or costs payable by the client. NYLIFE Distributors and unaffiliated third parties act as placement agent for certain of our investment funds not registered with the SEC (i.e., private funds) for which we act as investment adviser or investment subadviser. We pay such placement agents a portion of the compensation we receive from the investor referred by the placement agent. In some cases, investors who invest in certain of our private funds through a thirdparty placement agent pay a management fee that is higher than the management fee they would have paid if they had not invested through such placement agent. Where NYLIFE Distributors is the placement agent, our employees who are registered representatives of NYLIFE Distributors may be responsible for the sale of interests in these private funds. The sale of interests in these private funds by employees that are registered representatives of NYLIFE Distributors, is a factor that is considered in determining their annual compensation.

Accordingly, to meet the requirements of the Custody Rule, investment funds not registered with the SEC that we sponsor are typically subject to an annual audit in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) conducted by an independent public accountant registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) and the audited financial statements are distributed to investors in such investment funds not registered with the SEC within 120 days of the end of the funds’ fiscal year. MacKay Shields generally does not act as custodian or otherwise take or retain possession, custody, title or ownership of holdings of client accounts. However, in certain instances, MacKay Shields may be deemed to have custody of client assets, other than as described in the preceding paragraph. As required by the Custody

Rule, MacKay Shields has engaged a qualified independent accounting firm to conduct an annual surprise examination on the client accounts over which MacKay Shields is deemed to have custody. Other than investment funds for which we or an affiliate act as general partner, manager, managing member, sponsor, trustee, director or in a similar capacity, clients select their own qualified custodians, such as banks or brokerdealers, to maintain client assets. Clients typically receive account statements directly from their custodians and/or from their custodian banks’ accounting departments. Clients should carefully review those statements. In addition, clients typically receive account statements from us. When a client receives an account statement from us, such clients are encouraged to compare them to the account statements received from their custodian and/or custodian bank accounting department. There may be differences in market values between our account statements and the custodian’s account statement for various reasons. For example, we and the custodian may use different pricing sources to value securities held in portfolios. Other differences can occur because we and the custodian may generate account statements on different dates (such as on a trade date versus settlement date basis) or may be due to the custodian’s policies for handling certain assets or changes in the values of certain assets.

When we act on behalf of a collective investment vehicle, our authority to select the identity and amount of securities to be bought or sold is limited by that collective investment vehicle’s offering and governing documents. For clients participating in securities lending programs, security recall provisions may interfere with, or prohibit, our ability to pursue certain investment opportunities, or represent such clients in certain matters, such as cooperation agreements, restructuring negotiations and ad-hoc committees. In these and similar circumstances, we may not, or may be unable to, act on such investment opportunities and matters. Our portfolio managers, client service and operations representatives, and legal and compliance personnel participate in the review of investment guidelines before we begin managing a client’s account, as well as each time that a client proposes amendments thereto.

MacKay Shields may deviate from the Guidelines in certain circumstances, including (1) when designated personnel, including portfolio managers, believe it is in the best interest of the client to vote otherwise, (2) when instructed by a client to use client-specified proxy voting guidelines, and (3) when a client has retained voting authority for an account. When our personnel determine it is in the best interest of a client to vote at variance with the Guidelines, Compliance reviews the request to determine whether any potential material conflict of interests exist between us and our clients. If a potential conflict exists, Compliance refers the override requests to our Compliance Committee for appropriate resolution. The Compliance Committee considers the facts and circumstances of the potential conflict and determines how to vote. A material conflict of interest will likely also exist when we manage a separate account, a fund or other collective investment vehicle that invests in an affiliated fund and we receive a proxy for the affiliated fund. MacKay Shields has adopted the Proxy Voting Policy to mitigate such

conflict of interest by voting in accordance with the Guidelines. If no Guidelines are available, we will vote in accordance with the recommendation of the Provider. If the Provider has not provided a recommendation we then will address the conflict by “echoing” or “mirroring” the vote of the other shareholders in those underlying funds. Generally, MacKay Shields is not responsible for voting and does not vote proxies for clients in wrap fee programs, nor does MacKay receive proxy solicitations for such clients. However, in circumstances when wrap fee program clients authorize us to vote proxies for such client accounts, MacKay Shields will use the Guidelines. A copy of our proxy voting policies and procedures or information as to how proxies were voted for securities held in client accounts is available upon request.