• S&P 500 7,659.44 −1.09%
  • Dow Jones 52,002.41 −0.34%
  • Nasdaq 26,713.03 +0.08%
  • VIX 19.99 +21.45%
  • 10-year Treasury 5.09% −0.01
  • Dollar index 121.40 −0.14%
  • WTI crude $101.91 +1.04%

Nokomis Capital, L.L.C.: investment adviser

Nokomis Capital, L.L.C. is an investment adviser registered with the SEC (file 801-74902, CRD 145627). What it reports on Form ADV: assets and clients, fees, owners, disciplinary history and its client brochure. From the SEC's Investment Adviser Public Disclosure site; read Oct 21, 2026.

Assets managed
$804.2M
Discretionary
100%
Accounts
2
Employees
5
In advisory roles
3
Disclosures
0

Company page · SEC adviser record · Full Form ADV (PDF)

The firm reports that it or a related person has custody of client cash and securities.

Form ADV Part 1A, Item 5, as filed on the SEC Investment Adviser Public Disclosure site; read Oct 21, 2026.

Clients and fees

Whom the firm advises and how it is paid, from Items 5.D, 5.E and 5.G.

Client typeClientsAssetsShare
Private funds and other pooled vehicles1$636.7M79.2%
Charities1$167.5M20.8%

How it is paid

  • A percentage of assets under your management
  • Performance-based fees

Services

  • Portfolio management for pooled investment vehicles (other than investment companies)
  • Portfolio management for businesses (other than small businesses) or institutional clients (other than registered investment companies and other pooled investment vehicles)

Who owns it

Schedule A lists direct owners of 5% or more (and officers who own a stake); Schedule B lists the owners of those owners.

Direct owners (Schedule A)

OwnerTypeRoleStakeSinceControlPublic company
Brett Allen HendricksonPersonManager and memberE 75% or moreOct 2007Yes

Form ADV reports ownership in bands, not exact stakes: A means 5% to 10%, B 10% to 25%, C 25% to 50%, D 50% to 75%, E 75% or more. F marks a general partner, trustee or managing member, a role that controls the firm without a percentage. Owners of less than 5% are not listed.

Form ADV Schedules A and B, via the SEC Investment Adviser Public Disclosure site.

Disciplinary history

The firm answered No to every disciplinary question on Form ADV (Item 11).

The brochure

Form ADV Part 2A: the plain-language document an adviser must give its clients. Each item is shown as filed; open an item to read all of it.

Nokomis Capital, L.L.C. - ADV Part 2A, filed Mar 23, 2026. Brochure PDF. Items: 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15 · 16 · 17 · 18

Item 4. Advisory business

Nokomis Capital, L.L.C. (“Nokomis”, “we”, “us”, “our”), a Texas Limited Liability Company founded in October 2007, is an investment services firm specializing in investment management for hedge funds and separately managed accounts for certain clients. The principal owner of our firm is Brett A. Hendrickson. Nokomis currently serves as the investment manager for and provides discretionary investment advisory services to the following private pooled investment funds: (i) Nokomis Capital Offshore Fund, LTD, a Cayman Islands exempted company (the “Offshore Fund”); (ii) Nokomis Capital Partners, L.P., a Texas Limited Partnership (the “Onshore Fund”); and (iii) Nokomis Capital Master Fund, L.P., a Cayman Islands Limited Partnership (the “Master Fund”).

Read the rest of Item 4 (413 more words)

The Offshore Fund and Onshore Fund are collectively referred to herein as the “Feeder Funds”. The private pooled investment funds are structured as a master-feeder fund wherein the feeder funds place their assets in the master fund and the investment program is conducted at the master-fund level (collectively, the “fund clients”) and a separately managed account for an institutional client (the “managed account client”). Although the master fund described in Section 7.B.(1) of Schedule D of our Part 1A of Form ADV is treated as our client for purposes of our Part 1A of Form ADV, the fund clients and the managed account client are referred to collectively herein as our “clients”. This firm brochure is not an offer to invest in our fund clients. We perform a detailed analysis and modeling of individual companies for our clients against a backdrop of analysis of pricing trends for various markets. We utilize a range of investment strategies for our clients, including investing in publicly traded equity securities, both long and short, as well as in a broad array of other securities in public markets. We employ a long/short strategy to both mitigate risk as well as maximize returns. For more information on the investment strategy of our clients, please see Item 8: Method of Analysis, Investment Strategy and Risk of Loss. An affiliate of Nokomis, Nokomis Capital Advisors, L.P., a Texas Limited Partnership (the “General Partner”), acts as the general partner of the Master Fund and is directly controlled by Nokomis. The General Partner is subject to the Advisers Act pursuant to the Adviser’s registration in accordance with SEC guidance. Our firm tailors our advisory services in accordance with our clients’ needs and investment strategy as disclosed in the offering documents of the feeder funds or the managed account agreement, as applicable. Our clients generally may not impose restrictions on our ability to invest in certain securities or types of securities, other than the restrictions set forth in the offering documents of the feeder funds and the managed account agreement with our managed account client, as applicable.

The investment objectives, fee arrangements and terms of the current and any future established Managed Accounts are individually negotiated, and any such Managed Account relationships are subject to significant account minimums. We do not participate in any wrap fee programs. As of December 31, 2025, we manage $804,159,000 of client regulatory assets on a discretionary basis. We do not manage any client assets on a non-discretionary basis.

Item 5. Fees and compensation

Our firm or one of our affiliates typically receive two types of compensation from our clients – an asset-based management fee and performance-based compensation. With respect to our fund clients, we deduct the asset-based management fee from the master fund’s account quarterly at the beginning of each quarter. The asset-based management fee is generally equal to an annual rate of 1.0% of the capital sub-account balances subject to the asset-based management fee, calculated and payable quarterly in advance. Additionally, the performance-based compensation for the fund clients is made as an allocation at the master fund level to the capital account of our affiliate who serves as one of the general partners of the master fund and is generally made at the end of each year.

Read the rest of Item 5 (995 more words)

Such allocation is generally 20% of the net profits (including realized and unrealized appreciation or depreciation) of the capital sub-accounts subject to the performance-based allocation for each year, subject to a “high water mark” limitation. For the fund clients, the asset-based management fee and performance-based allocation are calculated and determined utilizing memorandum capital sub-accounts (“sub-accounts”) in the master fund that relate to the capital accounts or series of shares, as applicable, of investors in the feeder funds. The offering documents of the feeder funds contain further details of the calculation and determination of the asset-based management fee and the performance-based allocation. While the fund clients themselves do not negotiate fees, with respect to investors in our fund clients, we have the general discretion to modify or waive all or a portion of the assetbased management fee and/or the performance-based allocation, and have done so in the past and may do so in the future. Any such reductions or waivers of fees have effectively reduced, and may in the future reduce, the aggregate fees charged to fund clients. Occasionally we enter into side letter arrangements with certain investors, in which we grant them different or preferential terms. Our firm and our affiliates do not pay the assetbased management fee or the performance-based allocation. Additionally, non-qualified investors in our feeder funds are not subject to the performance allocation, per Rule 205-3 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. The managed account client is a qualified purchaser and pays an asset-based management fee and a performance-based fee as described in its managed account agreement. We bill the managed account client for the asset-based management fee promptly following the end of each calendar quarter and for the performance-based fee generally at the end of each

calendar year. The managed account client generally satisfies such fees by causing them to be deducted and paid from its account. We have the general discretion to modify or waive all or a portion of the managed account client’s asset-based management fee and/or the performance-based fee. We generally do not need to provide fee refunds to the investors in our fund clients before the end of a billing period, because they do not pay a fee in excess of what they owe given that the investors generally can only withdraw from our fund clients as of the end of a quarter (during which advisory services are rendered). However, if our fund clients are dissolved and liquidated during a quarter, they (and ultimately their investors) will automatically receive a refund equal to a pro rata portion of the asset-based management fee based on the months remaining in the quarter. Likewise, if certain illiquid investments made by our fund clients, which are designated as special investments, are realized during a quarter, any investors that are invested only in such realized special investments (and have no other investment in our fund clients) will automatically receive a refund equal to a pro rata portion of the asset-based management fee based on the months remaining in the quarter, to the extent any such investors are bearing the asset-based management fee. Neither the performance-based compensation owed by our fund clients nor any of the fees owed by our managed account client is payable in advance. In connection with our hedge fund advisory services, our fund clients bear all of their own organizational and operational expenses. The list below details some of these expenses, but does not include every possible expense our fund clients could incur.

legal fees (including settlement costs);

costs of any litigation or investigation involving our fund clients’ activities;

accounting costs (including tax preparation and audit expenses);

administration costs, including the cost of the administrator;

insurance;

costs associated with reporting and providing information to existing and potential investors;

any governmental fees imposed on our fund clients; and

withholding and/or transfer taxes.

These fund clients also pay for expenses related to the investment of their assets, such as:

proxy expenses;

interest and commitment fees on loans and debit balances;

borrowing charges on securities sold short;

custodial fees;

brokerage commissions;

trade processing fees, including clearing and settlement charges;

research fees and materials (including online news and quotation services);

costs of any outside appraisers, accountants, attorneys or other experts or consultants engaged in connection with specific transactions;

bank charges; and

other ordinary miscellaneous research and trade-related expenses.

Costs and expenses borne by our fund clients are set forth in further detail in their offering documents. We can elect to absorb some or all of these costs on behalf of our fund clients in our sole discretion. The managed account client pays for administrator and auditor expenses, and the managed account is responsible for all custodial fees, brokerage commissions, clearing fees, interest, expenses related to proxies and withholding or transfer taxes incurred in connection with trading for the account. We incur certain expenses listed above on behalf of both our fund clients and our managed account client. With respect to limited types of these shared expenses, we absorb the managed account client’s pro rata portion of such expenses, and the fund clients pay their pro rata portion of the expenses, which ultimately reduces the net profit earned by the fund clients. As the Investment Manager, we render our services to clients at our own expense and will be responsible for our overhead expenses including, without limitation, office rent; utilities; furniture and fixtures; stationery; secretarial/internal administrative services; salaries and bonuses of employees; employee insurance and payroll taxes. For more information on brokerage transactions and costs, please see Item 12 - Brokerage Practices. Neither our firm nor any of our principals, officers or employees receive any compensation for the sale of securities or other investment products. It is critical that Fund investors refer to the relevant offering documents of the applicable Fund for a complete understanding of how Nokomis is compensated for its advisory services. The information contained herein is a summary only and is qualified in its entirety by such documents.

Item 6. Performance-based fees and side-by-side management

We and our affiliate, who is a general partner of the master fund, receive performancebased compensation in the forms more fully described in Item 5 - Fees and Compensation. It is possible that the existence of the performance allocation creates an incentive for our firm or our affiliates to make riskier or more speculative investments because these investments have the potential to allow our firm to collect larger incentive-based compensation. Our firm’s investment in our fund clients aids in aligning our interests with the interests of investors in our fund clients.

Read the rest of Item 6 (75 more words)

Although we do not manage any clients that do not pay performance-based compensation, to the extent some clients pay a higher percentage of performance-based compensation, a potential conflict of interest exists where we are incentivized to favor such accounts. However, we seek to mitigate any resulting conflicts by striving to act in the best interests of all clients by allocating investments equitably between our clients as more fully described in Item 16 – Investment Discretion.

Item 7. Types of clients

Our fund clients are hedge funds (i.e., pooled investment vehicles) that rely on certain exclusions from the definition of “investment company” in the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. Accordingly, none of our fund clients are registered as investment companies with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Investors in our fund clients must generally make a minimum investment of $1,500,000. We have the discretion to, and on occasion accept investments for a lesser amount. We also provide investment advisory services to a separately managed account for an institutional client. We decide whether to open a separately managed account on a case by case basis. This firm brochure is not an offer to invest in our fund clients.

Item 8. Methods of analysis, investment strategies and risk of loss

In managing our clients, we utilize an outsized focus on fundamental, bottom-up research on individual (primarily U.S.-based) companies. This research process generally includes extensive quantitative research linked with extensive qualitative research. We make a concerted effort to make money on both sides of our clients’ portfolios, short and long, at all times. Our research process allows our clients to get involved with situations that other institutional investors find too complex, and also to find situations where the future cash flows of a business have the potential to significantly outperform the real and implied expectations of Wall Street.

Read the rest of Item 8 (3,427 more words)

In addition to prudent management of overall net exposure, we take a disciplined approach to risk management for our clients in terms of overall gross exposure, sector exposure and the sizing of individual positions and the correlation of individual positions to each other. We seek to create low risk, below-market volatility that generates superior absolute and

relative returns over the intermediate and long terms for our clients regardless of the equity market environment. Our investment style can be best described as “value” and “growth at a reasonable price.” In addition, a contrarian view of the world tends to color both our stock selection and the way in which we direct resources within the research process. We utilize a strong bottomup focus on both the long and short side (as opposed to market or sector timing), with intensive company-specific and industry research. This investment style excludes getting caught up in short-term “over trading,” and we believe that this longer-term approach—in concert with the intense research process—gives our firm a competitive advantage for our clients. The mix of investments that we recommend for our clients typically tilts towards small-cap companies, as we have historically found the greatest market inefficiencies in securities for companies of this size. Generally, our clients invest in parallel, subject to the certain guidelines set forth in the offering documents of the fund clients and the managed account agreement of the managed account client. Our research process can best be described as intense company-specific and industry research on both the quantitative and qualitative sides constantly working in concert. Research on the quantitative side leads to further probing and discovery on the qualitative side and vice-versa. The quantitative side of the research process comes primarily from intensive financial modeling. This financial modeling includes historical and projected future financial results across several reporting periods with a focus not only on a company’s expected revenue and earnings per share, but also its working capital needs/tendencies; free cash flow; earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization; and “discretionary cash flow.” The modeling process also includes analysis and forecasting of a company’s various operating segments and a detailed reading and understanding of the disclosures in a company’s SEC filings. Further, the quantitative portion of process often goes beyond numbers actually reported by the company including, but not limited to, the following exercises: 1) using third-party data to track the raw materials and other input costs of the company against its reported margins; 2) benchmarking the company’s financial metrics against those of other companies in the industry; 3) analyzing the impact of changes in import duties and tariffs; 4) measuring/estimating the impact of changes in implied manufacturing utilization; and 5) utilizing county appraisal records to estimate real (versus stated) asset values. Further, we constantly support the continual adjustment of our financial projections with the qualitative side of our research process. A thorough evaluation of management’s capabilities takes place at the start of our due diligence process and continues on as we initiate and maintain the investment position for our clients. Further, we believe that truly valuable qualitative research on a company includes “grassroots” research efforts. Our grassroots research can include face-to-face and telephonic conversations with a company’s competitors, suppliers, customers, customers of its customers (where applicable) and former employees, as well as industry consultants and trade associations. Additionally, our attendance at a given industry’s trade shows and other events serves as ideal venues not only for gathering information, following up with existing contacts and viewing new products or technologies, but also for networking and developing relationships with new people who might be helpful to our firm and our clients over time.

Finally, depending on the type of company, grassroots research also occasionally includes extensive visits to a company’s locations or properties. In addition to our core focus on well-researched investment positions, we also have some small, short-term oriented “trading positions.” We generally enter these trading positions without conducting the same level of research on the underlying company that we otherwise would for our core positions because they are short-term in nature and we are trying to take advantage of new information that we believe the market has not yet fully digested. These trading positions often also serve to hedge certain macro or sector factors that might impact our overall portfolio and also leverage the research that we have done on other companies in the given sector. These trading positions are typically less than 1.5% of a portfolio’s NAV. Despite our thorough research and analysis and comprehensive investment strategies, investing in any security involves a risk of loss that clients and investors in our clients must be prepared to bear. Please see below for a detailed explanation of some of the significant risks associated with the investment strategies we employ. The following risk factors do not purport to be a complete list or explanation of all the risks associated with an investment with our firm.

Investment Judgment and Market Risk: The success of our investment programs depends, in large part, on correctly evaluating future price movements of potential investments. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to accurately predict these price movements and that our investment programs will be successful.

Investment and Trading Risk: Investments in securities and other financial instruments involve a degree of risk that the entire investment could possibly be lost. The use of short sales and option trading can, in certain circumstances, substantially increase the impact of unfavorable price movements of our clients’ investments. Also, changes in the general level of interest rates could negatively affect our clients’ results.

Dependence on our Firm. The success of our clients is largely dependent upon our firm. There is no guarantee that our firm or the individuals employed by our firm will remain willing or able to provide advice to the clients’ accounts or that trading on this advice will be profitable in the future. The performance of our firm depends upon certain key personnel. If any of these personnel become incapacitated, the performance of our clients could be adversely affected.

Financial Markets and Regulatory Change: The instability in global financial markets has increased the risks associated with the investment activities and operations of hedge funds, including those resulting from a reduction in the availability of credit and the increased cost of short-term credit, a decrease in market liquidity and an increased risk of bankruptcy of third parties with which we work. Market disruptions over the recent years and the increase in capital being allocated to hedge funds and other alternative investment vehicles have

led to increased scrutiny and regulation over the hedge fund and asset management industry. In addition, the laws and regulations affecting business continue to evolve unpredictably. Laws and regulations applicable to our clients, especially those involving taxation, investment and trade, can change quickly and unpredictably in a manner adverse to our clients’ interests.

Competition. The securities industry generally, and the varied strategies and techniques to be engaged in by Nokomis in particular, are extremely competitive. Our Clients compete for investment opportunities against various other investors, including many of the larger securities and investment banking firms, which have substantially greater financial resources and research staffs, as well as other hedge funds, which may also have greater resources and access to information, different investment strategies or compensation structures. Competitive investment activity by other firms can reduce a client’s opportunity for profit by reducing or amplifying the magnitude as well as the duration of the market inefficiencies which it seeks to exploit.

Concentration of Investments. We generally intend to hold relatively few investments, which potentially subjects a client to significant losses if it holds a large position in a particular investment that declines in value or is otherwise adversely affected. In addition, the same result can occur if a client’s investments experience a greater than anticipated correlation. In that circumstance, Fund positions that generally have been considered diversified can be subject to significant losses due to related events or changes in investment correlation more generally.

Available Information. We select investments in part on the basis of information and data filed by the issuers of securities with various government regulators or made directly available to us by such issuers, or through sources other than the issuers. Although we evaluate such information and data and seek independent corroboration when we consider it appropriate and when it is reasonably available, we are not in a position to confirm the completeness, genuineness or accuracy of such information and data, and in some cases complete and accurate information is not readily available. Moreover, fundamental research, coupled with extensive due diligence, may not be sufficient to detect fraud by a portfolio company.

Cybersecurity and Identity Theft: Cybersecurity incidents, cyber-attacks, denial of service attacks, ransomware attacks and social engineering attempts (including business email compromise attacks), both generally and within the financial services industry, have been occurring globally at a more frequent and secure level and will likely continue to increase in frequency in the future. Nokomis, its clients, its service providers, its counterparties and other market participants on whom we rely increasingly depend on complex information

technology and communications systems to conduct business functions. These information and technology systems are subject to a number of different threats or risks that can adversely affect our clients and/or their investors, despite the efforts of Nokomis and other parties on whom we rely to adopt technologies, processes and practices intended to mitigate these risks. Although we have implemented various measures to manage these risks, Cybersecurity events could result in the disruption of our operations, significant financial losses, legal action, and the misappropriation of sensitive data and/or confidential firm or client information.

Geopolitical Risks and Force Majeure. An unstable geopolitical climate and continued threats of terrorism could have a material adverse effect on general economic conditions, market conditions and market liquidity. U.S. military actions around the globe; the threat or occurrence of terrorist attacks in the future; rising oil, energy and other commodity or material prices (including those resulting from the unavailability thereof); and the United States’ military, economic and political responses to terrorism and other military conflicts all can have material consequences on the U.S. and global economies. We are not able to predict the extent, severity or duration of the effect of any past or future terrorist attacks, military conflicts, and related events or quantify the impact that these events can have on investment objectives or the markets where an underlying client investment will be located. For example, the continued threat of terrorism and the impact of military or other action have led to and will likely lead to increased volatility in prices for certain commodities and could affect certain portfolio companies’ financial results.

Natural Disasters. Natural or environmental disasters, such as earthquakes, fires, floods, hurricanes, tsunamis, and other severe weather-related phenomena have been and can be highly disruptive to economics and markets, adversely impacting individual companies, sectors, industries, markets, currencies, interest and inflation. We are not able to predict the extent, severity or duration of the effect of any past or future natural disaster and related events or quantify the impact that these events can have on investment objectives or the markets where an underlying client investment will be located. In addition, due to the uncertainty of their duration and the timing of recovery, we are not able to predict the extent to which natural disaster will have a material adverse effect on our clients.

Pandemics. The securities industry is subject to risks related to public health crises such as the pandemic associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”). A global disease outbreak, and the public and private sector policies and initiatives in response thereto (such as the imposition of travel restrictions and the adoption of remote working), impacts issuers across many industries. Furthermore, pandemics impact the broader economies of affected countries, including negatively impacting economic growth, the proper functioning of financial and capital markets, foreign currency exchange rates and

interest rates. Due to the speed with which pandemics develop and the uncertainty of their duration and the timing of recovery, we are not able to predict the extent to which a pandemic, including the COVID-19 pandemic, will have a material adverse effect on the Funds. The following is a description of the various strategies that we utilize in advising our clients and some important risks associated with each strategy. The following explanation of certain risks is not exhaustive, but rather highlights some of the more significant risks involved in our investment strategies.

Equity Securities: We buy, on our clients’ behalf, equity securities that we believe to be undervalued, seeking to profit from both security selection and thematic sector or market timing decisions. The value of these investments will generally vary with their issuer’s performance (including the activities and financial condition of the issuer), fluctuations in the relevant business market in which the issuer competes, movements in the equity markets and general economic conditions. Because of this, our clients may suffer losses if they invest in equity instruments of issuers whose performance diverges from our expectations.

Small and Mid-Cap Stocks: We invest in small and mid-capitalization stocks on behalf of our clients. Investments in small and mid-capitalization stocks involve greater risk than is customarily associated with larger, more established companies. These companies often have sales and earnings growth rates that exceed those of large companies. These growth rates are reflected in more rapid share price appreciation. However, smaller companies often have limited product lines, markets or financial resources, and they are dependent upon small management teams. These securities can have limited marketability and may be subject to more abrupt or erratic movements in price than securities of larger companies or the market averages in general.

Short Selling: We sell short securities on behalf of our clients. Short selling of securities occurs when we borrow securities, promising to buy them at a later date. If the price drops, we can buy the securities at the lower price and make a profit on the difference. If the price of the securities rises, we have to buy them back at the higher price, and the investment loses money. Short sales that are not made “against the box” theoretically involve unlimited loss potential since the market price of securities sold short may continuously increase. Buying the securities can itself cause the price of the securities to rise further which would exacerbate the potential for loss. Under adverse market conditions, we might have difficulty purchasing securities to meet our clients’ short sale delivery obligations, and might have to sell portfolio securities of our clients to raise the capital necessary to meet those short sale obligations at a time when fundamental investment considerations would not favor such sales.

Options: We take long or short positions in call and/or put options on behalf of our clients. There are risks associated with the sale and purchase of options. Call options are the right to buy a security at a certain price within a defined time period. Put options are the right to sell a security at a certain price within a defined time period. A buyer of either type of option assumes the risk of losing its entire investment in the option. A buyer of a call option risks losing its investment if the particular security never reaches the designated price within the set time period. A buyer of a put option risks losing its investment if the particular security does not decline enough to reach the designated price within the set time period. A seller of an uncovered option has to pay substantial additional margin, and bears an unlimited risk of loss, since the seller must deliver, or take delivery of, an asset at a predetermined price which can, upon exercise of the option, be significantly different from the market value.

Leverage/Borrowing. Subject to applicable margin and other limitations, we can borrow funds in order to make additional investments for our clients. Borrowing involves risk to our clients because the interest on the borrowed amount could be greater than the income from or increase in the value of the securities purchased with the borrowed amount. Also, the value of the securities purchased with the borrowed amount can decline below the amount borrowed. Any investment profits made with the proceeds from borrowings in excess of interest paid on the borrowings will cause the income and value of a client to be greater than would otherwise be the case. On the other hand, if the value of the additional securities purchased with the borrowed money does not increase enough to cover the interest paid on the borrowings, then the income and value of a client will be less than would otherwise be the case. Generally, borrowingtype techniques used to increase potential returns are all forms of leverage.

Derivatives: At times, we invest in derivative contracts on behalf of our clients. A derivative is a financial instrument that is a contract between two parties, the value of which is linked to another security or commodity, or an “underlying asset.” Some of the derivatives in which we trade are over-the-counter, meaning they are privately negotiated between two parties, as opposed to being traded on an exchange. Over-the-counter transactions typically involve significant transaction costs. Any derivative contract typically involves leverage, as it exposes our clients to potential gain or loss from a change in the price of an underlying asset in an amount that exceeds the amount of cash or assets required to establish or maintain the derivative contract. Consequently, an adverse change in the price of the underlying asset can result in a loss to our clients that is more exaggerated than would have resulted from an investment that did not involve the use of leverage inherent in a derivative contract. Finally, derivative contracts present additional risks because, ultimately, their success depends in part on the counterparty’s financial condition, that is, the counterparty’s ability to turn over

the cash flow it promised. In the event of a counterparty’s default, our clients will only rank as unsecured creditors and risk the loss of all or a portion of the amounts they are contractually entitled to receive.

Illiquid Investments: From time to time we make illiquid investments on behalf of our clients. Illiquid investments are investments that are not heavily traded and cannot easily be converted to cash. If any of our clients requires cash and we must sell illiquid investments at an inopportune time, we might not be able to sell illiquid investments at prices that reflect our assessment of their value or the amount paid for them.

Foreign Securities: We invest in foreign securities on behalf of our clients. Investing in foreign securities involves certain risk factors not typically associated with investing in U.S. securities, such as fluctuation between exchange rates and the costs of converting from one currency to another. In addition, limited information may be available regarding foreign securities because foreign companies and governments may not be subject to accounting, auditing and financial reporting standards and requirements comparable to those of the U.S. There also might be a greater risk of political, social or economic instability and the possibility that foreign taxes could be imposed on our clients’ income.

Currency Exposure. From time to time, a Fund’s portfolio will have positions which are denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars. Accordingly, the value of such assets can be affected favorably or unfavorably by fluctuations in currency rates. We may not necessarily seek to hedge the foreign currency exposure of a Fund and as such, a Fund can be subject to varying degrees of foreign exchange risks. In addition, prospective investors whose assets and liabilities are predominately in other currencies should take into account the potential risk of loss arising from fluctuations in value between the U.S. dollar and such other currencies.

We do not recommend primarily any single type of security. Our clients generally hold a diverse range of investments, yet we still encourage our clients as well as their investors to consider all of the risk factors we have described above. In addition, investors in our fund clients should review the offering documents for such clients, which set out a more detailed discussion of the risks associated with our investment strategies. Any investment can be risky and our clients and investors in our clients must be prepared to assume any potential loss. In addition, in the event of certain market losses or other cause events, our managed account client will not be subject to the liquidity restrictions that will continue to apply to our fund clients.

Item 9. Disciplinary information

Neither our firm nor any of our management persons has been involved in any legal or disciplinary events in the past 10 years that we believe would be material to a client’s,

prospective client’s, an investor’s or a prospective investor’s evaluation of our advisory business or the integrity of our management. Neither our firm nor any of our management persons has been involved in any criminal or civil actions in a domestic, foreign or military court of competent jurisdiction. Neither our firm nor any of our management persons has been subject to an administrative proceeding before the Securities and Exchange Commission, any other federal regulatory agency, any state regulatory agency or any foreign financial regulatory authority. Neither our firm nor any of our management persons has been subject to a proceeding before any self-regulatory organization.

Item 10. Other financial industry activities and affiliations

Neither our firm nor any of our management persons is registered, or has an application pending to register, as a broker-dealer or a registered representative of a broker-dealer. Neither our firm nor any of our management persons is registered, or has an application pending to register, as a futures commission merchant, commodity pool operator, a commodity trading advisor, or is an associated person of any of the above. We manage the following master-feeder fund structure:

Nokomis Capital Partners, L.P.;

Nokomis Capital Offshore Fund, Ltd.; and

Nokomis Capital Master Fund, L.P.

Read the rest of Item 10 (69 more words)

Nokomis Capital Advisors, L.P., an affiliate of our firm and our related person, acts as general partner to Nokomis Capital Partners, L.P. and Nokomis Capital Master Fund, L.P. We do not recommend or select other investment advisers for our clients, receive compensation directly or indirectly from other advisers that create a material conflict of interest, or have other business relationships with them that create a material conflict of interest.

Item 11. Code of ethics, participation in client transactions and personal trading

Personal Trading We have adopted a Code of Ethics in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission requirements. Our Code of Ethics works to ensure that our principal and employees act in accordance with our firm’s fiduciary duty to our clients and ensures that our principal and employees act in a manner as to avoid actual or potential conflicts of interest or any abuse of an individual’s position of trust and responsibility. Our Code of Ethics generally prohibits, with limited exceptions, personal trading on individual equity securities by individuals on our investment team. Investments made by any person covered

Read the rest of Item 11 (242 more words)

by our Code of Ethics while in possession of material, non-public information are prohibited. We also require preclearance before purchasing certain authorized investments for a personal securities account of individuals on our investment team, and individuals covered by our Code of Ethics generally. We also require all persons covered by our Code of Ethics to submit periodic reports of securities holdings and transactions. We require prompt internal reporting to our Chief Compliance Officer of any violation of our Code of Ethics. This paragraph only represents a summary of key provisions in our Code of Ethics. We provide a copy of our entire Code of Ethics to any prospective client, any client or any investor in our fund clients that requests one. A copy of the Code of Ethics may be requested by contacting the Adviser at the address or telephone number listed on the first page of this document. Neither our firm nor any of our related persons recommends to clients, or buys or sells for client accounts, securities in which we or our related persons have a material financial interest. Our firm and our related persons are generally prohibited from buying or selling for themselves securities that they also buy or sell for our clients. Limited exceptions apply, such as when previously held securities positions are “grandfathered in” to an employee personal account. However, for these shares to be sold, employees must have the trades approved by Compliance prior to instructing.

Item 12. Brokerage practices

Broker-dealers are selected for client securities transactions at our sole discretion. We direct a large portion of our brokerage business to the broker-dealers with the lowest cost of execution (excluding any soft dollar mark-ups). However, in selecting broker-dealers and determining the reasonableness of their commissions for our clients’ transactions, our firm seeks to obtain the best execution for our clients’ portfolios, taking into account the following factors:

The broker-dealer’s ability to effect prompt and reliable executions at favorable prices (including the applicable profit or commission, if any);

The operational efficiency with which transactions are effected, considering the size of the order and difficulty of execution;

The financial strength, integrity and stability of the broker-dealer;

The firm’s risk in positioning a block of securities;

Read the rest of Item 12 (1,243 more words)

The quality, comprehensiveness and frequency of available research services considered to be of value; and

The competitiveness of commission rates in comparison with other brokerdealers that satisfy our selection criteria.

As further described below, we receive research and other soft dollar benefits, and may receive client or investor referrals, from broker-dealers. We also occasionally receive other non-monetary benefits in the form of incidental meals and entertainment. Research and Other Soft Dollar Benefits. We are permitted to pay additional broker commissions and in riskless principal transactions, pay higher prices to buy securities from, or accept lower prices for the sale of securities to, brokerage firms that provide us or our affiliates with certain investment and research information. Research and brokerage services furnished by broker-dealers include written information and analyses concerning specific securities, companies or sectors; market, financial and economic studies and forecasts; statistics and pricing or appraisal services; discussions with research personnel; invitations to attend conferences or meetings with management or industry consultants; and quotation and trading software. We are not required to weigh any of these factors equally. We have the option to use “soft dollars” generated by our clients’ securities transactions to pay for the research and non-research related services described above. The term “soft dollars” refers to the receipt by an investment manager of products and services provided by brokers, without any cash payment by the investment manager, based on the volume of revenues generated from brokerage commissions for transactions executed for clients of the investment manager. The products and services available from brokers include both internally generated items (such as research reports prepared by employees of the broker) as well as items acquired by the broker from third parties (such as quotation software). Section 28(e) of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, provides a “safe harbor” to investment managers who use soft dollars generated by their advised accounts to obtain investment research and brokerage services that provide lawful and appropriate assistance to the investment manager in the performance of investment decision-making responsibilities. The products that we use soft dollars to obtain include company-specific research reports, industry research reports, access to the analysts who write the reports, corporate access events such as conferences where we access the management teams of the companies in which we invest for our clients, and quotation and trading software. Additionally, we use soft dollars to pay for services that help us in investment-decision making. These services include, but are not limited to, access to an expert network, an SEC filings aggregation service, a credit card meta data service, technology industry consultants, and oil & gas engineers advising us on the prospects for specific oil & gas fields. We used soft dollars to acquire all of the foregoing products and services in the last fiscal year and will additionally use soft dollars to pay for market data fees and OEMS fees. We intend to limit our soft dollar use to fall within Section 28(e) of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We may receive products and services that may be used for both permitted and non-permitted purposes under Section 28(e). The receipt and determination of the appropriate allocation of such “mixed use” products and services creates a potential conflict of interest between us and our clients. In such instances, we will make a good faith determination of the relative proportion of the products and services used for permitted purposes (which will be acquired with soft dollars) and the relative proportion used for non-permitted purposes (which will be paid for from our own resources to the extent not otherwise a client expense).

The products and services that we obtain with soft dollars are used to service all of our clients’ accounts. The relative benefit received from these products and services is proportional to each client account’s net asset value relative to the total net asset value of all of our clients’ accounts. Similarly, we generate soft dollars from our clients’ accounts in approximate proportion to the net asset value of each client’s account. Therefore, by definition, each of our clients’ accounts is receiving an equitable benefit from soft dollar expenditures relative to the cost of soft dollar expenses incurred by the account. We review soft dollar arrangements as part of the onboarding process and periodically thereafter to determine, amongst other things, whether the products or services provide legitimate assistance in the investment decision making process and the reasonableness of the commissions paid in relation to the value of the products or services received. The Use of Soft Dollars Can Create a Conflict of Interest. Using client transactions to obtain research and other benefits creates incentives that result in conflicts of interest between advisers and their clients. When we use client markups or markdowns to obtain research or other products and services, our firm receives a benefit because we do not have to pay for the research, products and services. The availability of these benefits could influence us to select one broker-dealer rather than another to perform services for clients, based on our interest in receiving the products and services instead of on our clients’ interest in receiving the best execution prices. Obtaining these benefits could cause our clients to pay higher fees than those charged by other broker-dealers. The use of soft dollars to obtain research services and to pay for other costs and expenses that our firm might otherwise incur creates a conflict of interest between our firm and our clients because our clients pay for products and services that are not exclusively for their benefit and that could be primarily or exclusively for the benefit of our firm. To the extent that we are able to acquire these products and services without expending our own resources, our use of soft dollar benefits tends to increase our profitability. We Have in the Past Considered Referrals in Selecting Broker-Dealers, but We Have Not Received Referrals for an Extended Period of Time. When we previously received referrals from broker-dealers, we directed execution business to such broker-dealers partially based on the referral of clients or investors in our clients. This practice presented an inherent conflict of interest, as we might have an incentive to direct business to brokerage firms based on our interest in receiving referrals rather than on our clients’ interest in receiving most favorable execution. However, we mitigated this conflict due to the fact that the brokers that provided us with client or investor referrals generally offered our firm the lowest-cost execution of any brokers we did business with. To the extent we receive referrals in the future and direct execution business to the referring brokers based in part on such referrals, we would expect to face the same conflicts of interest described above and would seek to mitigate them in a similar manner. In addition, we periodically review broker-dealer arrangements to evaluate each broker-dealer’s performance and ensure that broker-dealer selection is consistent with our fiduciary duty to our clients.

Our Clients Do Not Direct Brokerage. Our firm does not recommend, request or require that a client, nor do we permit a client to, direct us to execute transactions through a specified broker-dealer. Although not obligated to do so, where practical, we aggregate the purchase or sale of securities for the various client accounts. For information on our practices regarding when we aggregate the purchase or sale of securities for various client accounts, please see Item 16 – Investment Discretion.

Item 13. Review of accounts

Our principal, Brett A. Hendrickson, regular, ongoing reviews our clients’ accounts. This review is conducted on a daily basis, as appropriate, and as triggered by economic and market conditions. This review includes an assessment of daily profit and loss reports with respect to our clients’ investment positions. Mr. Hendrickson evaluates our clients’ investments in a manner consistent with our clients’ investment program. Kendall Lunney, in her capacity as Chief Financial Officer and Chief Compliance Officer, periodically reviews clients’ investments with respect to consistency with applicable laws and regulations. Additionally, Ms. Lunney, in coordination with the independent administrator, reconciles all trades.

Read the rest of Item 13 (165 more words)

In coordination with the third-party administrator, we provide investors in our fund clients with monthly performance data and account balances. We additionally provide investors in our fund clients with quarterly investment letters and, on an annual basis, we also provide said investors with written annual reports that contain audited financial statements and tax information. We are obligated to provide our managed account client with reports, generally in writing, regarding any soft dollars relating to the account on at least a quarterly basis. Our managed account client has transparency that differs from the investors in our fund clients, at least in part because the managed account client has a direct contractual relationship with its administrator and initial prime broker that have separate reporting obligations to the managed account client. Upon request, we may agree to provide certain clients or investors with additional information that others will not receive. We reserve the right to provide more frequent reporting to our clients or investors as we deem necessary.

Item 14. Client referrals and other compensation

Other than as described in Item 12 – Brokerage Practices, we do not receive an economic benefit from non-clients for providing advisory services to our clients. Other than as described in Item 12 – Brokerage Practices, we do not compensate any person for client referrals.

Item 15. Custody

Due to our access to our fund clients, our, or our affiliate’s, role as the investment manager or general partner of the master fund (as appropriate), and our authority to deduct fees and other expenses from our fund clients’ accounts, we are deemed under Rule 206(4)-2 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, to have custody of our clients’ funds.

In order to comply with Rule 206(4)-2, we utilize the services of a bank or other qualified custodian (as defined under Rule 206(4)-2) to hold all securities of our clients. We also ensure that the qualified custodian maintains these funds in accounts that contain only client funds and securities.

Read the rest of Item 15 (153 more words)

While Rule 206(4)-2 generally requires an investment adviser to ensure that a qualified custodian sends account statements to clients at least quarterly, we are not subject to this requirement with respect to our fund clients because all fund clients managed by our firm are subject to audit at least annually by an independent auditor that is registered with, and subject to regular inspection by, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. In these cases, we distribute audited financial statements to all investors in our fund clients within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year of the clients. Additionally, we do not have custody of the assets of our managed account client. The managed account client receives reports from us, its prime broker and its administrator as specified in its managed account agreement. Nokomis urges all clients and fund investors to carefully review all statements received from the firm, its administrator and/or custodians.

Item 16. Investment discretion

Our firm accepts discretionary authority to manage our clients’ securities accounts. Essentially, this means that we have the authority to determine, without obtaining specific client consent, which securities to buy or sell and the amount of securities to buy or sell, the broker through which we effect trades and the commission rates at which we effect trades. Despite this broad authority, we are committed to adhering to the investment strategy and program set forth in each of our clients’ offering documents and/or managed account agreement. These documents cover matters such as the types and amounts of securities of which a client’s portfolio will consist and the degree of risk assumed by a client’s portfolio.

Read the rest of Item 16 (328 more words)

In addition, various securities and/or tax laws, as well as internal compliance policies, may impose additional restrictions on the investments that we may be able to make for our clients. Before accepting their subscriptions for interests in, or shares of, a feeder fund, as applicable, we provide all potential investors with an offering document that sets forth, in detail, our investment strategy and program for the fund clients. By completing our subscription documents to acquire an interest in, or shares of, as applicable, one of our feeder funds, investors give us complete authority to manage their investments in accordance with the offering document that they each received. Prior to providing investment advice to a managed account client, we require each client to give us complete discretionary authority to buy and sell any investment securities and instruments in the amounts and at the prices that we determine, subject to the pre-approval for the purchase of certain types of securities and any other limitations that could be imposed in a client’s managed account agreement.

Because the fund clients and managed account client follow a similar investment strategy, subject to their respective investment guidelines, we strive to manage the investment programs of all of our clients equitably, which includes generally allocating all investment opportunities pro rata among the clients where appropriate. Therefore, where practical, we aggregate the purchase or sale of the securities for the various client accounts. We then allocate the securities purchased (or sold) among our clients equitably. We place combined orders when feasible for all client accounts, and, if all these orders are not filled at the same price, we generally average the prices paid. Similarly, if an order on behalf of more than one account cannot be fully executed under current market conditions, we allocate the trade among the different accounts on a basis that we consider equitable. Situations may occur where one client could be disadvantaged because of the investment activities we conduct for other clients.

Item 17. Voting client securities

Because our clients have delegated the power to vote their securities to our firm, we have implemented proxy voting policies and procedures in accordance with securities laws and our fiduciary obligations to our clients. We strive to vote client proxies in a manner consistent with our clients’ best interests. Our officers, directors and employees seek not to be influenced by outside sources whose interests conflict with our clients’ interests. We often abstain from voting when we agree with management’s recommendation. Incidents when we will vote proxies include: when there is a contested issue, there is a potential corporate governance problem, executive compensation or benefits appear to be excessive, we do not support a proposed board member, etc.

Read the rest of Item 17 (189 more words)

We vote in a manner that we believe reasonably furthers the best interests of the client and is consistent with the client’s investment philosophy as set forth in the relevant documents. Our clients cannot direct our vote in any particular solicitation. If a proxy vote creates a material conflict between our interests and the interests of a client, we will resolve the conflict before voting the proxies. We will either disclose the conflict to the client and obtain consent or take other steps designed to ensure that a decision to vote the proxy was based on our determination of the clients’ best interest and was not the product of the conflict. We maintain records of how we vote all proxies on behalf of our clients. These records are available to the clients, including any investor in our fund clients, upon request. Our clients, as well as any investors in our fund clients, may also obtain a copy of our proxy voting policies and procedures upon request. This information can be obtained by contacting the Adviser at the address or telephone number listed on the first page of this document.

Item 18. Financial information

We do not require nor do we solicit prepayment of more than $1,200 in fees per client, six months or more in advance. We do not believe any financial condition exists that is reasonably likely to impair our ability to meet contractual commitments to our clients.

Our firm has never been the subject of a bankruptcy petition.

Form ADV Part 2A, via the SEC Investment Adviser Public Disclosure site.