Private company
MONEY CONCEPTS CAPITAL CORP
Corporation registered in the United States, active since 1982. Summary from the record
Last updated Oct 21, 2026.
Overview
Corporate structure
MONEY CONCEPTS CAPITAL CORP is part of a group headed by Money Concepts International,. 3 entities, 1 country on record. Switch between the flow chart and the network, and select any entity to see its details.
Major holders of MONEY CONCEPTS CAPITAL CORP
- Win Class A Stock Trust, Denis Owns 75% or more of World Investment, since 09/2012 (Form ADV)
- Money Concepts International,
- MONEY CONCEPTS CAPITAL CORP Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, United States
- FONAR CORP Stake · Melville, New York
- MONEY CONCEPTS CAPITAL CORP Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, United States
Built from major holders from Schedules 13D and 13G; stakes of 5% or more it reported on Schedules 13D and 13G (1 companies); owners and owned firms from Form ADV, the registration investment advisers file with the SEC. Each entity in the chart links to its source.
Investment adviser
MONEY CONCEPTS CAPITAL CORP is registered with the SEC as an investment adviser. This is what it reports on Form ADV, the registration every adviser files and keeps current.
- Assets it manages$4.1B3 17,032 accounts, $2.5B with discretion
- Employees478 375 in investment advice or research
- ClientsIndividuals (other than high net worth individuals): 16,296 ($3.0B); High net worth individuals: 511 ($993.5M); Pension and profit sharing plans (but not the plan participants or: 143 ($37.4M); Corporations or other businesses not listed above: 51 ($24.1M); Charitable organizations: 31 ($9.0M)
- How it is paidA percentage of assets under its management; Hourly charges; Fixed fees (other than subscription fees); Other: SOLICITOR FEE
- What it doesFinancial planning services; Portfolio management for individuals and/or small businesses; Portfolio management for businesses (other than small businesses) or institutional clients (other than registered investment companies and other pooled investment vehicles); Other: GENERAL CONSULTING SERVICES
- Holds client assetsYes: cash and securities
- RegistrationSEC 801-39736, CRD 12963 IAPD record
Who owns it
Owners of 5% or more as the firm lists them (Schedule A), and the owners of those owners up the chain (Schedule B).
- MONEY CONCEPTS INTERNATIONAL,owns 75% or more, since 01/1991
- WIN CLASS A STOCK TRUST, DENISowns 75% or more of WORLD INVESTMENT, since 09/2012
Disciplinary record
The firm answered yes to 6 of the disciplinary questions on Form ADV (Item 11). A yes can concern the firm itself or an affiliate.
- Any other federal regulatory agency, any state regulatory agency, or any foreign financial regulatory authority has found the firm or an advisory affiliate to have been involved in a violation of investment-related regulations or statutes.
- In the past ten years, any other federal regulatory agency, any state regulatory agency, or any foreign financial regulatory authority has entered an order against the firm or an advisory affiliate in connection with an investment-related activity.
- Any other federal regulatory agency, any state regulatory agency, or any foreign financial regulatory authority has denied, suspended, or revoked the firm's or an advisory affiliate's registration or license, or otherwise prevented the firm or an advisory affiliate, by order, from associating with an investment-related business or restricted the firm's or an advisory affiliate's activity.
- Any self-regulatory organization or commodities exchange has found the firm or an advisory affiliate to have been involved in a violation of its rules (other than a violation designated as a "minor rule violation" under a plan approved by the SEC).
- Any domestic or foreign court has dismissed, pursuant to a settlement agreement, an investment-related civil action brought against the firm or an advisory affiliate by a state or foreign financial regulatory authority.
- Any domestic or foreign court has Are the firm or an advisory affiliate now the subject of any civil proceeding that could result in a "yes" answer to any part of Item 11.H.(1).
Each event as the firm describes it on its Disclosure Reporting Pages:
STATE OF ILLINOIS · Mar 29, 1989 · final
Allegations: FAILURE TO FILE IFS CAPITAL'S FINANCIAL CONDITION REPORT WITHIN THE 60 DAY FILING PERIOD.
Sanction: Censure
How it ended: Consent
Detail: IFS CAPITAL ENTERED A STIPULATION TO ENTER CONSENT ORDER OF CENSURE. IFS CAPITAL RECEIVED A CONSENT ORDER OF CENSURE WHEREBY, WE RESOLVED THE MATTER WITHOUT FORMAL HEARING; WE ADMITTED TO THE JURISIDICTION OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF IL AND CONSENTED TO THE ENTRY OF THE CONSENT ORDER; WE SUBMIT TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE A NORTARIZED AFFIDAVIT SUBSCRIBING THE STEPS AND PROCEDURES IMPLEMENTED TO PREVENT SIMILIAR VIOLATIONS OF THE ACT. THE FORMAL HEARING ON THE MATTER WAS VACATED WITHOUT FURTHER PROCEDDING.
Summary: IFS CAPITAL ENTERED A STIPUTLATION TO ENTER CONSENT ORDER OF CENSURE. IFS CAPITAL RECEIVED A CONSENT ORDER OF CENSURE WHEREBY, WE RESOLVED THE MATTER WITHOUR FORMAL HEARING; IFS ADMITTED TO THE JURISIDICATION OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF IL AND CONSENTED TO THE ENTRY O FTHE CONSENT ORDER; IFS SUBMIT TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE A NORTARIZED AFFIDAVIT SUBSCRIBING THE STEPS AND PROCEDURES IMPLEMENTED TO PREVENT SIMILIAR VIOLATIONS OF THE ACT. THE FORMAL HEARING ON THE MATTER VACATED WITHOUT FURTURE PROCEDDING.
Resolved: Mar 29, 1989
STATE OF ILLINOIS · Mar 29, 1989 · final
Allegations: FAILURE TO FILE IFS CAPITAL'S FINANCIAL CONDITION REPORT WITHIN THE 60 DAY FILING PERIOD.
Sanction: Censure
How it ended: Consent
Detail: IFS CAPITAL ENTERED A STIPULATION TO ENTER CONSENT ORDER OF CENSURE. IFS CAPITAL RECEIVED A CONSENT ORDER OF CENSURE WHEREBY, WE RESOLVED THE MATTER WITHOUT FORMAL HEARING; WE ADMITTED TO THE JURISIDICTION OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF IL AND CONSENTED TO THE ENTRY OF THE CONSENT ORDER; WE SUBMIT TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE A NORTARIZED AFFIDAVIT SUBSCRIBING THE STEPS AND PROCEDURES IMPLEMENTED TO PREVENT SIMILIAR VIOLATIONS OF THE ACT. THE FORMAL HEARING ON THE MATTER WAS VACATED WITHOUT FURTHER PROCEDDING.
Summary: IFS CAPITAL ENTERED A STIPULATION TO ENTER CONSENT ORDER OF CENSURE. IFS CAPITAL RECEIVED A CONSENT ORDER OF CENSURE WHEREBY, WE RESOLVED THE MATTER WITHOUT FORMAL HEARING; WE ADMITTED TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF IL AND CONSENTED TO THE ENTRY OF THE CONSENT ORDER; WE SUBMIT TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE A NORTARIZED AFFIDAVIT SUBSCRIBING THE STEPS AND PROCEDURES IMPLEMENTED TO PREVENT SIMILIAR VIOLATIONS OF THE ACT. THE FORMAL HEARING ON TEH MATTER WAS VACATED WITHOUT FURTHER PROCEDDING.
TEXAS · Oct 21, 1996 · fine $2,500 · final
Allegations: THE STATE OF TEXAS ALLEGED THAT MONEY CONCEPTS CAPITAL CORP. HAD FAILED TO FULLY COMPLY WITH RULE 115.1(S) WHICH REQUIRES ALL OFFICES IN TEXAS OF A REGISTERED SECURITIES DEALER WHERE RECORDS ARE MAINTAINED OR THE SUPERVISION OF REGISTERED PERSONS TAKE PLACE MUST BE REGISTERED AS A BRANCH OFFICE WITH THE STATE.
Sanction: Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
How it ended: Withdrawn
Detail: WHILE MONEY CONCEPTS CAPITAL CORP. HAD REGISTERED ALL REPRESENTATIVES WITH THE NASD, MONEY CONCEPTS CAPITAL CORP. FAILED TO REGISTER EACH OFFICE AS A BRANCH OFFICE. MONEY CONCEPTS CAPITAL CORP. PAID AN ADMINISTRATIVE FINE IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,500. MONEY CONCEPTS CAPITAL CORP. IMMEDIATELY REGISTERED ALL OFFICES THAT MET THE DEFINITION UNDER RULE 115.1(S) AS A BRANCH OFFICE. MONEY CONCEPTS CAPITAL CORP. FURTHER REVIEWED THE INTERNAL COMPLIANCE SYSTEM TO INSURE ITS COMPLIANCE WITH TEXAS STATE OPERATIONS.
Resolved: Apr 11, 1999
CONNECTICUT · Sep 14, 1994 · fine $1,000 · final
Allegations: MONEY CONCEPTS CAPITAL CORP. D/B/A MONEY CONCEPTS ADVISORY SERVICE OPENED A SINGLE ACCOUNT IN THE DYNAMIC ASSET ALLOCATION SERVICE TO A CLIENT IN CONNECTICUT BEFORE REGISTERED IN CONNECTICUT AS AN INVESTMENT ADIVSOR AS REQUIRED BY CONNECTICUT SECTION 36-474 (C) OF THE ACT.
Sanction: Other
How it ended: Stipulation and Consent
Detail: MONEY CONCEPTS AGREED TO REVIEW WSPS AND COMPLIANCE PROCEDURES TO DETECT AND PREVENT VIOLATIONS OF THE CT UNIFORM SECURITIES ACT AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 36-474(C).
Resolved: Jun 29, 1993
SECRETARY OF STATE NEVADA. · Aug 2, 2006 · fine $7,500 · final
Allegations: UNLICENSED INVESTMENT REPRESENTATIVE
Sanction: Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
How it ended: Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Detail: A LETTER OF CAUTION WAS GIVEN TO US AS WELL AS A $7000.00 FINE. 8/2/06
Summary: MR. ABULENCIA IS THE ONLY IAR WE HAVE LICENSED IN THE STATE OF NEVADA. WE WHERE UNAWARE OF THE STATES BRANCH REQUIREMENTS SINCE HE DID NOT HAVE OR SOLICIT CLIENTS WHILE LOCATED AT THIS BRANCH. MR. ABULENCIA MOVED FROM THE STATE OF CALAFORNIA WHERE ALL OF HIS ADVISORY CLIENTS RESIDE TO THE STATE OF NEVADA. THE LACK OF REGISTRATION IN THE STATE OF NEVADA WAS MERELY DUE TO THE MISUNDERSTANDING OF THE IAR REQUIREMENTS.
Resolved: Aug 7, 2006
STATE OF ILLINOIS · Mar 29, 1989 · fine $500 · final
Allegations: FAILURE TO FILE IFS CAPITAL'S FINANCIAL CONDITION REPORT WITHIN THE 60 DAY FILING PERIOD.
Sanction: Censure
How it ended: Consent
Detail: IFS CAPITAL ENTERED A STIPULATION TO ENTER CONSENT ORDER OF CENSURE. IFS CAPITAL RECEIVED A CONSENT ORDER OF CENSURE WHEREBY, WE RESOLVED THE MATTER WITHOUT FORMAL HEARING; WE ADMITTED TO THE JURISIDICTION OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF IL AND CONSENTED TO THE ENTRY OF THE CONSENT ORDER; WE SUBMIT TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE A NORTARIZED AFFIDAVIT SUBSCRIBING THE STEPS AND PROCEDURES IMPLEMENTED TO PREVENT SIMILIAR VIOLATIONS OF THE ACT. THE FORMAL HEARING ON THE MATTER WAS VACATED WITHOUT FURTHER PROCEDDING.
Resolved: Mar 29, 1989
FINRA · Dec 4, 2007 · fine $13,500 · final
Allegations: MONEY CONCEPTS CAPITAL COPR. FALIED TO TIMELY REPOT FIVE CUSTOMER-RELATED MATTERS DISCLOSABLE UNDER NASD CONDUCT RULE 3070 AND FAILED TO TIMELY AMEND FORMS U-4 FOR SIX REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES TO REPORT SIX DISCLOSABLE CUSTOMER MATTERS AND ONE FORM U-5 TO REPORT A DISCLOSABLE CUSTOMER-RELATED MATTER.
Sanction: Censure
How it ended: Acceptance, Waiver & Consent(AWC)
Detail: MONEY CONCEPTS WAS ORDERED TO PAY $13,5OO.OO FINE TO FINRA AND CENSURED FOR LATE FILINGS OF FORM U-4 DISCLOSURES.
Summary: MONEY CONCEPTS CAPITAL COPR. FALIED TO TIMELY REPOT FIVE CUSTOMER-RELATED MATTERS DISCLOSABLE UNDER NASD CONDUCT RULE 3070 AND FAILED TO TIMELY AMEND FORMS U-4 FOR SIX REGISTERED REPRESENTATIVES TO REPORT SIX DISCLOSABLE CUSTOMER MATTERS AND ONE FORM U-5 TO REPORT A DISCLOSABLE CUSTOMER-RELATED MATTER.
Resolved: Dec 14, 2007
NEW HAMPSHIRE · Jan 24, 2007 · final
Allegations: FAILED TO COMPLY WITH NH REQUIREMENT FOR A DESIGNATED PRINCIPAL.
How it ended: Consent
Detail: REFRAIN FROM FURTHER VIOLATIONS.
Resolved: May 2, 2007
KENTUCKY · Jun 6, 2008 · final
Allegations: NON-COMPLIANCE WITH HEIGHTENED SUPERVISION OF INDIVIDUAL REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF KENTUCKY.
Sanction: Civil and Administrative Penalt(ies) /Fine(s)
How it ended: Order
Detail: THE VOLUNTARY $5000 CONTRIBUTION TO THE INVESTOR PROTECTION TRUST WAS PAID ON JULY 23, 2008.
Resolved: Jul 23, 2008
OHIO DIVISION OF SECURITIES · Jul 27, 2017 · final
Allegations: REIT'S SOLD IN AMOUNTS GREATER THAN 10 PERCENT OF CLIENTS LNW, VIOLATING PROSPECTUS GUIDELINES.
Sanction: Cease and Desist
How it ended: Consent
Detail: MONEY CONCEPTS CAPITAL CORP. VOLUNTARILY ENTERED INTO A CONSENT AGREEMENT WITH THE OHIO DIVISION OF SECURITIES. THE FIRM AGREED TO OFFER RESCISSION/RESTITUTION TO OHIO INVESTORS IDENTIFIED AS HAVING BEEN SOLD REITS IN EXCESS OF OHIO'S 10 PERCENT LIQUID NET WORTH CONCENTRATION LIMIT. TOTAL AMOUNT NOT YET KNOWN.
Resolved: Jul 27, 2017
Civil Judicial Action · Apr 4, 2002 · pending
Allegations: CLAIMANT ALLEGE THAT REPRESENTATIVE, SHELLY SMITH, MADE CERTAIN NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION INDUCING CLAIMANT TO PURCHASE UNSUITABLE STOCKS AND MUTUAL FUNDS. CLAIMANT IS ALLEGING THAT MONEY CONCEPTS CAPITAL CORP. HAS BREACHED ITS FIDUCIARY DUTIES.
Sanction: Money Damages (Private/Civil Complaint)
Civil Judicial Action · Jun 7, 2010 · pending
Allegations: PLAINTIFF IS ALLEGING NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION, COMMON LAW FRAUD, CIVIL CONSPIRACY AND BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY.
Sanction: Money Damages (Private/Civil Complaint)
Civil Judicial Action · Oct 5, 2010 · pending
Allegations: NEGLIGENCE, FRAUD, ILLEGALITY, FRAUDULENT INDUCEMENT, NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION, UNSUITABILITY AND BREACH OF CONTRACT.
Sanction: Other
Civil Judicial Action · Mar 9, 1998 · final
Allegations: CLAIMANTS ALLEGED NEGLIGENCE AND BREACH OF DUTY BY THE FIRM IN CONNECTION WITH ALLEGED UNSUITABLE INVESTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS BY A PRINCIPAL OF A THIRD PARTY INVESTMENT ADVISER. CLAIMANTS SEEK TO RECOEVER $250,000 IN DAMAGES, REPRESENTING IN PART THE UNPAID BALANCE OF A JUDGEMENT AGAINST THRID PARTY INVESTMENT ADVISER AND ITS PRINCIPALS.
Sanction: Money Damages (Private/Civil Complaint)
How it ended: Dismissed
Resolved: Dec 15, 1999
Civil Judicial Action · Apr 14, 1998 · final
Allegations: CLIENTS OF BANKRUPT THIRD PARTY INVESTMENT ADVISER ALLEGES NEGLIGENCE OR BREACH OF DUTY BY APPLICANT IN CONNECTION WITH ALLEGED MISAPPROPRIATION OF ASSETS BY A DECEASSED PRINCIPAL OF THE THIRD PARTY ADVISER. CLAIMANTS SEEK RECOVERY OF ALLEGED DAMAGES IN EXCESS OF $1,015,341 JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY FROM SEVERAL PARTIES INCLUDING THE FIRM.
Sanction: Restitution
How it ended: Settled
Resolved: Jun 29, 2001
Civil Judicial Action · Sep 11, 1998 · final
Allegations: CLIENTS OF BANKRUPT THIRD PARTY INVESTMENT ADVISER ALLEGES NEGLIGENCE OR BREACH OF DUTY BY APPLICANT IN CONNECTION WITH ALLEGED MISAPPROPRATION OF ASSETS BY A DECEASED PRINCIPAL OF THE THIRD PARTY ADVISER. CLAIMANTS SEEK RECOVERY OF ALLEGED DAMAGES OF $1,450,000 JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY FROM SEVERAL PARTIES INCLUDING THE FIRM.
Sanction: Restitution
How it ended: Settled
Detail: SEE SUMMARY BELOW (#14)
Resolved: Jun 29, 2001
Civil Judicial Action · Oct 15, 1998 · final
Allegations: CLIENTS OF BANKRUPT THIRD PARTY INVESTMENT ADVISER ALLEGES NEGLIGENCE OR BREACH OF DUTY BY APPLICANT IN CONNECTION WITH ALLEGED MISAPPROPRIATION OF ASSETS BY DECEASED PRINCIPAL OF THE THIRD PARTY ADVISER. CLAIMANTS SEEK RECOVERY OF ALLEGED DAMAGES OF $95,000 JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY FROM SEVERAL PARTIES INCLUDING THE FIRM.
Sanction: Restitution
How it ended: Dismissed
Resolved: Oct 1, 2000
Civil Judicial Action · May 22, 1998 · final
Allegations: CLIENT OF BANKRUPT THIRD PARTY INVESTMENT ADVISER ALLEGES NEGLIGENCE OR BREACH OF DUTY BY APPLICANT IN CONNECTION WITH ALLEGED MISAPPROPRIATION OF ASSETS BY A DECEASED PRINCIPAL OF THE THIRD PARTY ADVISER. CLAIMANT SEEKS RECOVERY OF ALLEGED DAMAGES OF $80,000 JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY FROM SEVERAL PARTIES INCLUDING THE FIRM.
Sanction: Restitution
How it ended: Dismissed
Resolved: Oct 1, 2000
Civil Judicial Action · Aug 31, 2000 · final
Allegations: CLIENT OF BANKRUPT THIRD PARTY INVESTMENT ADVISER ALLEGES NEGLIGENCE OR BREACH OF DUTY BY APPLICANT IN CONNECTION WITH ALLEGED MISAPPROPRIATION OF ASSETS BY A DECEASED PRINCIPAL OF THE THIRD PARTY ADVISER. CLAIMANT SEEK RECOEVERY OF ALLEGED DAMAGES FO $78,000 JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY FROM SEVERAL PARTIES INCLUDING THE FIRM.
Sanction: Restitution
How it ended: Dismissed
Resolved: Oct 1, 2000
Civil Judicial Action · Aug 1, 2000 · final
Allegations: CLIENT OF BANKRUPT THIRD PARTY INVESTMENT ADVISER ALLEGES NEGLIGENCE OR BREACH OF DUTY BY APPLICANT IN CONNECTION WITH ALLEGED MISAPPROPRIATION OF ASSETS BY A DECEASED PRINCIPAL OF THE THIRD PARTY ADVISER. CLAIMANT SEEK RECOVERY OF ALLEGED DAMAGES OF $72,000 JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY FROM SEVERAL PARTIES INCLUDING THE FIRM.
Sanction: Restitution
How it ended: Dismissed
Resolved: Oct 1, 2000
Civil Judicial Action · May 30, 2000 · fine $26,000 · final
Allegations: CLIENT OF BANKRUPT THIRD PARTY INVESTMENT ADVISER ALLEGES NEGLIGENCE OR BREACH OF DUTY BY APPLICANT IN CONNECTION WITH ALLEGED MISAPPROPRIATION OF ASSETS BY A DECEASED PRINCIPAL OF THE THIRD PARTY ADVISER. CLAIMANT SEEK RECOVERY OF ALLEGED DAMAGES OF $99,000 JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY FROM SEVERAL PARTIES INCLUDING THE FIRM.
Sanction: Restitution
How it ended: Settled
Detail: ALL CLAIMS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, NO ADMISSION OR FINDING OF LIABILITY.
Resolved: May 25, 2001
Civil Judicial Action · Oct 6, 1999 · final
Allegations: ALLEGING MONEY CONCEPTS CAPITAL CORP. IS VICARIOUSLY RESPONSIBLE FOR AN ALLEGED SALE OF A SECURITY (PROMISSORY NOTE) BY AN OFF- SITE INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
Sanction: Restitution
How it ended: Settled
Detail: SETTLEMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $50000.
Resolved: Jul 2, 2001
Another 5 records concern GWN SECURITIES INC. (2), the firm (2), MORRISON, LANCE, MATTHEW (1), which report the details on their own Form ADV.
Timeline
- Jun 23, 1982Founded MONEY CONCEPTS CAPITAL CORP is founded2
Filings
29 filings to the SEC since October 2021: 29 other. The latest 20:
- Aug 20, 2026N-PX EDGAR
- Aug 4, 202613F-HR EDGAR
- Apr 30, 202613F-HR EDGAR
- Mar 31, 2026X-17A-5 EDGAR
- Feb 4, 202613F-HR EDGAR
- Nov 4, 202513F-HR EDGAR
- Aug 14, 2025N-PX EDGAR
- Aug 14, 202513F-HR EDGAR
- Apr 24, 202513F-HR EDGAR
- Apr 1, 2025X-17A-5 EDGAR
- Jan 27, 202513F-HR EDGAR
- Oct 31, 202413F-HR EDGAR
- Aug 22, 2024N-PX EDGAR
- Aug 2, 202413F-HR EDGAR
- May 1, 202413F-HR EDGAR
- Mar 1, 2024FOCUSN AUTO-GENERATED PAPER DOCUMENT EDGAR
- Feb 12, 202413F-HR EDGAR
- Nov 1, 202313F-HR EDGAR
- Aug 1, 202313F-HR EDGAR
- May 1, 202313F-HR EDGAR
The 29 filings since October 2021 can be filtered by form type and year here when JavaScript is on.
Every filing from the last five years, summarized. The full record is on SEC EDGAR.
Stakes it holds
MONEY CONCEPTS CAPITAL CORP has told the SEC it owns more than 5% of 1 company, latest first (Schedules 13D and 13G).
- FONAR CORPSCHEDULE 13G/A Nov 14, 2024 to Aug 18, 20254
Funding
Where the company's money came from, by calendar year: private offerings filed with the SEC, federal grants, loans, contracts and other assistance from USAspending.gov, and PPP loans from the SBA. Each bar links to the records below.
- PPP loans $1.1M
Figures by year
| Year | PPP loans | Total |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 | $1.1M | $1.1M |
PPP loans
Paycheck Protection Program loans of $150,000 and up, approved April 2020 to July 2021, from the SBA5. Matched to this company by name and state.
- Apr 7, 2020$1.1M PPP loan (first draw) from Truist Bank5To MONEY CONCEPTS CAPITAL CORP, Palm Beach Gardens FL; $1.1M forgiven Feb 3, 2021
Sources
The numbers on this page point here. Each one links to the record it came from.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5