The company's transition to a self-employed agency model was the subject of an employment tribunal. The court dismissed all of the grounds of appeal brought by the appellant.
In Smith (Leah) v National Farmers Union Mutual Insurance Society Limited and Robinsons Services Limited [2019] NIQB 37, the company denied liability for an accident sustained during an employee's attendance at work, but the court found against the company.
In 2017, Preston-based law firm Barber & Co were ordered to pay costs to NFU Mutual after the firm represented a claimant in an injury case without instruction. Barber & Co lost the case and HHJ Peter Hughes referred the case onto the Solicitors Regulation Authority, Lancashire Police and the Crown Prosecution Service for further action. The law firm claimed the case was the result of "two non-qualified fee earners creating false documentation."
In 2016, NFU Mutual denied liability for a £128,000 bill for damage to a cottage from a burst water pipe. NFU Mutual lost the case and was ordered by Mr Justice Holgate to pay £100,000 in legal costs on top of the damage.
In Maritsave Ltd v National Farmers Union Mutual Insurance Society Ltd [2011] EWHC 1660 (QB) lost a case, having incorrectly denied an insurance claim following a fire: the court found they failed to prove a policy breach, and ordered them to pay Maritsave Ltd.'s claim and damages.
In 2010, NFU Mutual sought compensation from HSBC towards fire damage to a property on the basis of double insurance but the judge agreed with HSBC and NFU Mutual was liable for the full extent of the claim.
Read the full text
Controversies
Frauds
In 2011, employee Gordon Murray was jailed for three years for his fraud on the members of £400,000.
In 2018, Iain Wishlade also an NFU employee, was jailed for over two years for submitting a fraudulent payment request from his business LDK Ltd to NFU Mutual.
There have also been periodic frauds on the NFUM by its policy holder members. The most serious of these saw the perpetrator jailed for 20 years following the arrangement of an explosion which injured 81 people.
Business interruption and COVID-19
When the coronavirus pandemic emerged (December 2019) NFU Mutual said its "standard Business Interruption cover usually requires damage to property, such as storms or fires, in order to be triggered, which means the majority of customers will not be covered for Coronavirus" and that "as a Mutual, one of our duties to our members is to remain solvent."
However, policyholders widely disputed NFU Mutual's position. In April 2020 an NFU Mutual customer questioned the insurer's position on business interruption in evidence to the House of Commons Treasury Select Committee.
NFU Mutual invited policyholders to claim for cancellation of advanced bookings coverage and did accept some claims under its Home and Lifestyle policies. In February 2023, the Insurance Post reported that complaints regarding a lack of coverage for COVID-19-related booking cancellations had been upheld. NFU Mutual acknowledged on its website that some businesses were not properly advised and may have missed out on cover for COVID-19-related booking cancellations, adding that businesses offering pre-March 2020 overnight accommodation who were not offered this extension should contact NFU Mutual for case review and potential compensation.
Commenting on this situation in February 2022, the Professional Association of Self-Caterers said: "NFU Mutual normally have a really good reputation amongst policyholders. They have though had a challenging Covid... Their cheaper Home and Lifestyle policy paid out for Covid, but the more expensive policy did not. They were the last major insurer to keep deducting Grants from pay-outs although thankfully they reversed this policy. Their Cancellation Advance Bookings add-on is a really good add on and we are trying to get others to offer similar."
The enduring dispute relates to non-damage denial of access cover extensions, on which NFU Mutual has asserted "This extension is intended to cover losses due to closure or restricted access by authorities following a specific incident or occurrence happening within the specified radius from the insured premises, and not by a nationwide event or global pandemic." explaining they thought they had sold cover only for events like a "bomb scare or a gas leak or a traffic accident".
Following the appeal to the UK Supreme Court (delivered January 2021) NFU Mutual published a statement saying it had no liability to meet claims for COVID-19 related business interruption. A number of policyholders formed a litigation group and announced plans to bring proceedings in a group action against NFU Mutual for which they instructed Penningtons Manches Cooper LLP.
In a BBC Midlands Today news item, one policyholder stated that the money from their claim had not been forthcoming from NFU Mutual for "we had an indemnity up to a certain level to protect us because something unfortunate had happened which would allow us to pick up after a very challenging time, and that money hasn't been forthcoming from NFU Mutual for over half a decade." NFU Mutual told the BBC it wouldn't be appropriate to comment but that it is defending the group action.
In March 2021 an article had alleged that NFU Mutual was among several firms deliberately delaying COVID-19 claims to avoid pay-outs, anticipating that businesses would fail before claims needed to be settled.
South Farm Limited and others v NFU Mutual
In July 2024 the case South Farm Limited and others v. The National Farmers Union Mutual Insurance Society Ltd (CL-2024-000309) came to court it was filed with an initial 37 claimants under a conditional fee arrangement with the law firm Pennington Manches Cooper. The solicitors elaborated on the case's significance: "This has the potential to be an extremely important case for a number of reasons. Once additional claimants in the approximately 90-strong group are formally added, this will be one of, if not the, largest Covid-19 group action claim against a single insurer in terms of claimant numbers.".
NFU Mutual requested a delay in the proceedings awaiting the decision of the Court of Appeal in International Entertainment Holdings Ltd & Others v Allianz Insurance PLC (CL-2022-000687), in the event that case largely went against NFU Mutual's position.
NFU Mutual a filed a defence in January 2025 in the High Court and a hearing took place on 19 December 2025 for case management and its progress was linked with the Innventure case.
Innventure Limited and others v NFU Mutual
NFU Mutual was in 2023 defending another class action by eight businesses, Innventure Limited and others v. The National Farmers Union Mutual Insurance Society Limited, associated with liabilities. This action was "recommenced" in July 2024, with a spokesman for these solicitors saying: "We are pleased to be able to represent the claimants in this historic case, which seeks to provide justice to the businesses who were unfairly interrupted in COVID-19." Court filings show a defence was filed for the Barings group action by NFU Mutual on 17 March 2025, and the claimants' reply was filed on 23 April 2025.
On 19 December 2025 for case management and its progress was linked with the South Farm case.
The joining of Innventure and South Farm cases
The litigation status was formalised in late 2025 ahead of a Case Management Conference (CCMC): on 21 November 2025, a Consent Order was issued by Mr Justice Jacobs.
A Case Management Conference (CCMC) was held on 19 December 2025 before Mr Justice Bryan. In the resulting Order for Directions, the court formally ordered that the Innventure (CL-2023-000589) and South Farm (CL-2024-000309) actions be heard and managed together.
The court directed the litigation toward a Preliminary Issue Trial to determine specific issues arising from the actions based on a statement of agreed and assumed facts.
Crucially, the court allowed amended pleadings that significantly expanded the scope of the defendant's potential liability. While the litigation already covered "Prevention of Access" (AOCA) claims, the updated directions formally incorporated disputes over Additional Increased Cost of Working (AICOW). This includes determining:
Whether AICOW and "Increased Cost of Working" are mutually exclusive.
Whether policyholders can claim up to an additional £50,000 limit for AICOW expenses.
Whether the defendant's consent for these expenses was unreasonably withheld
By addressing these AICOW provisions as a primary issue, the court has broadened the "heads of damage" being litigated beyond simple business interruption, representing a notable increase in the defendant's total exposure. The Preliminary Issue Trial is scheduled for a total of 4.5 days (including 1.5 days of pre-trial reading) and is to take place not before 4 June 2026.The combined litigation represents over 100 separate venues across the two claim groups.
On January 12, 2026, the defendant, NFU Mutual, filed an amended defence in both of the linked proceedings.
On February 3, 2026, the Claimants in the South Farm and Innventure litigations filed an Amended Reply to incorporate landmark 2024 Court of Appeal rulings, specifically arguing that the definition of an "incident" under NFU Mutual's business interruption policies must be interpreted in line with the Allianz precedents to include COVID-19 occurrences.
A trial has been listed for the week of 9–13 November 2026.
Policyholder Sentiment
The situation has exposed NFU Mutual to criticism and caused it to express regret and concern. In a Chartered Institute of Insurance podcast at the beginning of the pandemic in May 2020, Nick Turner (at the time sales and agency director, and subsequently CEO) stated that the company would face challenges with its reputation and relationships from these matters:"Trust is important everywhere in insurance... If you haven't written a policy wording very precisely to protect the insurance company and bring clarity to the consumer, then that is where the problems lie.. We [will] have to work to renew trust with certain customers [who may have been let down], it will be challenging this is going to run and run... if [the issues around policies we have sold have put policyholders] into incredibly difficult positions or even administration, nothing is going to put a smile on [their] face."Turner accepted that policyholders not receiving business interruption payments could impact their welfare and mental health in this same podcast. This perspective was reiterated in commentary by chairman Jim McLaren in another podcast, who said: "And you mentioned mental health and it's a crucial area and one that's often overlooked other than by those who are suffering from real mental health challenges. And again, the Mutual recognises that."
The significant resentment among policyholders regarding these repudiations of cover is evident through their direct testimonies. One affected policyholder articulated their frustration in 2020, stating: "They have quite happily taken the premiums for the last 15 years but the one time I need it I'm not going to get any help off them. It's disgusting that the insurance industry is allowed to do this.":
This perspective is reinforced by another impacted policyholder who, commenting on their experience with NFU Mutual, noted: "In good faith, we paid our premiums to NFU Mutual for years to protect us... we reached for the comfort and the security of the longstanding relationship with NFU Mutual and it turned to total ash.
In 2022, the Financial Reporting Council reviewed the accounting practices of NFU Mutual, asking for: "further information about the insurer’s potential exposure to claims for business interruption (BI) due to the Covid-19 pandemic and its approach to accounting for, and the disclosure of, a related potential group action threatened against the company."
The FRC stated NFU Mutual 'provided a satisfactory response' in 2021, with the NFU Mutual saying "the potential exposure regarding the nature and extent of the risk was not determined to be material."
In June 2025, MP Helen Morgan raised concerns in Parliament regarding NFU Mutual's progress in implementing the Financial Conduct Authority's recommendations from its January 22, 2021 "Dear CEOs" letter. Morgan posed a written question to the Chancellor of the Exchequer in the House of Commons, asking HM Treasury to comment on the "adequacy of the progress of (a) NFU Mutual and (b) other insurance providers in implementing the recommendations.".
Responding for the government Treasury minister Emma Reynolds MP said: "Under FCA rules, insurers must treat customers fairly. For example, the FCA’s rules require insurers to handle claims fairly and promptly; provide reasonable guidance to help a policyholder make a claim, and appropriate information on its progress; not reject a claim unreasonably; and settle claims promptly once settlement terms are agreed. The FCA has robust powers to take action against firms that do not comply with its rules."
Covid-19 Grants
In July 2020, NFU Mutual vehemently rejected the "accusation it misbehaved by deducting government grants from payouts," specifically regarding the value of government grants from coronavirus-related business interruption claims. However, Alistair Handyside, executive chairman of PASC UK, countered, stating: "Overwhelmingly our members are small, family run rural and coastal businesses for whom the Small Business Grant Fund is a critical lifeline intended to help businesses survive, not a grant to fund insurance company profits. Insurers that deduct grant money are threatening our long-term sustainability, and taking taxpayers' money designed to keep us afloat. The impacts of Covid-19 on small businesses in the tourism sector have been devastating. Many are now reluctant to make a claim, even though they are rightfully entitled, having paid their premium. We expect insurance companies to honour their contracts and not behave so poorly.
In November 2020, the company's conduct in deducting COVID-19 support grants from its payments triggered by COVID-19 were called into question in debate in the House of Commons with John Glen MP stating: "I am aware that NFU Mutual has continued to make such deductions. As stated in my letter, these grants are intended to provide emergency support to businesses at this time of crisis, and it is the Government's firm expectation that they are not to be deducted from business interruption insurance claims
Executive pay
In 2011, the issue of excessive pay has received negative attention, with the Insurance Times quoting an observer as saying: "Only two words come to mind – and they are 'snout' and 'trough'.
In 2013, a non-executive director of NFU Mutual, David Anderson, was scrutinised for his role as chief executive of the troubled Co-operative Bank during its financial collapse which had a capital short fall of £1.5bn. NFU Mutual's board left Anderson in place, going further and issuing a statement saying they benefited from his kind of advice and 'had no plans to review his appointment'.
Underinsurance Disputes
Northern Ireland dairy farmer Gary McConnell's case against NFU Mutual gained prominence in 2025 when NFU Mutual initially offered McConnell £18,000 for £55,000 in Storm Eowyn damages. McConnell, who asserted the insurer had assessed his property's sums insured, expressed "disgust and anger." Following media attention and intervention from his MP, Jim Allister, NFU Mutual reversed its decision and paid the claim in full. The insurer apologised, stating they "believed it was the correct decision given our understanding of the situation at the time," but later offered a Waiver of Underinsurance after investigating inconsistent information regarding the completion of building works. McConnell criticised the insurer's attempt to blame him for underinsurance.
Following McConnell's public statements, other farmers in Northern Ireland reported similar issues. Further attention was drawn by Derbyshire beef farmer David Hunt, who publicly disputed an NFU Mutual storm payout in December 2024. Hunt reported that his local NFU agent initially suggested keeping his claim "under the radar" to avoid head office involvement and advised a dangerous method for roof removal. Despite repair quotes of £32,000, NFU Mutual initially offered Hunt £4,800, which he claims he was "strong armed" into accepting. Hunt, a long-standing customer, demanded a review.
An internal email from NFU Mutual, noted in McCullagh's reported the Impartial Reporter newspaper, suggested potential systems level issues owing to conflicts between claim assessments and a software program used by staff.
Subsequent articles noted farmer criticisms of NFU Mutual for "losing its focus on core customers" and reported that current and former NFU agents expressed challenges in representing customers to head office, particularly regarding underinsurance.
In response to the criticism, an NFU Mutual spokesperson stated that the criticisms were "a fundamental misrepresentation of our business," asserting their pride in being the UK's leading rural insurer providing cover to three-quarters of the country's farms. They also noted their mechanisms for agent feedback.
NFU Mutual's underwriting practices came under public scrutiny following a 2018 report that Daily Mail features writer Guy Adams was allegedly refused home insurance due to his profession as a newspaper journalist. Adams claimed he was informed that journalists were now classified as "public figures," a categorization also applied to some Members of Parliament, leading to refusals of coverage. NFU Mutual acknowledged that it had previously declined applications from "some members of the media". Adams criticised the refusal as "extraordinary discrimination," expressing concern for journalists' ability to secure insurance if similar policies were widely adopted by other providers.
Other issues
In 2019 protests against badger culling were undertaken at the head office.
In 2019, errors by NFU Mutual, in failing to properly record insurance a customer had taken out, resulted in a customer having a £200,000 car seized and their customer facing criminal charges.