Controversies
Force-placed insurance
Maintaining a property insurance policy is one of the most common conditions imposed upon anyone who borrows money to purchase a house. If a borrower allows such a policy to lapse, US lenders will purchase force-placed insurance for the property owner (also called lender-placed insurance, or collateral protection insurance) The use of force-placed insurance by lenders is an ongoing practice that, in the wake of the financial crisis, has become increasingly common, being cited by many experts as the cause of foreclosures themselves. The coverage prevents gaps in insurance, which is required by the terms of most mortgages. The financial industry justifies higher premium costs of force-placed insurance policies because of the heightened insurance risk of borrowers who aren't paying for their own insurance. Opponents of the product consistently provide statistics in opposition to these statements, citing kickback payouts and loss ratios that are much lower than the rest of the insurance industry.
Force-placed insurance policies fell under regulatory scrutiny when the New York State Department of Financial Services (DFS) launched an investigation into the lender-placed insurance industry that has so far led to settlements with QBE and Assurant Although testimony in these hearings discussed "reverse competition" and kickbacks from Assurant to its banking clients, In response to the settlement, DFS Superintendent Benjamin Lawsky stated, "Prices should not be pushing up and up, pushing borrowers over the foreclosure cliff."
In January 2013, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau issued new mortgage servicing rules that ensures borrowers are warned in advance of force-placed insurance's cost and prevent banks from force-placing policies on many escrowed loans. “All consumers will receive protections before a servicer may impose a charge for a force-placed insurance,” an agency spokeswoman wrote. In October 2012, QBE and California agreed to a rate reduction for lender-placed insurance, with an average savings to policyholders of $577 annually.
The Federal Housing Finance Agency, which oversees Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the federal home loan banks, has looked into the relationships between force-placed insurers and their clients, determining the relationships to be fraudulent and banning any future service kickbacks. In addition, the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation is looking into the practice.
QBE Europe blacklisted in Sweden
QBE Europe was placed on the Råd & Rön Blacklist after the company chose not to follow a recommendation from the National Board for Consumer Disputes (ARN) regarding a financial advisory case. ARN is an alternative dispute resolution body that adjudicates disputes between consumers and businesses. In this specific case, ARN recommended that QBE compensate the consumer in the amount of SEK 255,000, but the company announced that it did not intend to comply with the decision.
Read the full text
It is extremely rare for a major insurance company operating in Sweden to be included on the Blacklist. According to public records from Råd & Rön, the list is dominated by smaller companies in the retail, service, and travel sectors; major firms within the finance and insurance industry appear very seldom. There are no known cases in Råd & Rön's history showing that any other major insurance company has previously been blacklisted, making QBE’s appearance a notable exception in the history of the Swedish insurance market.