Private company
Lead Edge Capital Management, LLC
Last updated Oct 21, 2026.
Overview
Corporate structure
Lead Edge Capital Management, LLC is part of a group headed by Lead Edge Principal Holdings Mh, LP. 5 entities, 1 country on record. Switch between the flow chart and the network, and select any entity to see its details.
Major holders of Lead Edge Capital Management, LLC
- Blue Owl Gp Stakes V (a) LP Owns 10% to 25% of Lead Edge Capital Management, LLC, since 07/2022 (Form ADV)
- Mitchell Howard Green Owns 50% to 75% of Lead Edge Principal Holdings Mh, LP Partner, since 07/2022 (Form ADV)
- Brian Paul Neider Owns control (general partner, trustee or manager) of Lead Edge Ugp, LLC, since 07/2022 (Form ADV)
- Nimay Kiran Mehta Owns control (general partner, trustee or manager) of Lead Edge Ugp, LLC (a) LP Partner, since 07/2022 (Form ADV)
- Dyal V Cayman Aggregator LP Owns 75% or more of Dyal U.s. V LLC, since 03/2020 (Form ADV)
- Blue Owl Gp Stakes V Offshore Owns 75% or more of Dyal V Cayman, since 03/2020 (Form ADV)
- Blue Owl Gp Stakes Associates V LP Owns control (general partner, trustee or manager) of Dyal U.s. V LLC, since 03/2020 (Form ADV)
- Blue Owl Gp Stakes Associates Owns control (general partner, trustee or manager) of Dyal V Cayman LP, since 03/2020 (Form ADV)
- Dyal LP Holdings LLC LLC Owns 75% or more of Blue Owl Gp Stakes Associates V LP Partner, since 05/2021 (Form ADV)
- Blue Owl Capital Carry LP Owns 75% or more of Blue Owl Gp Stakes Gp Holdings LLC, since 05/2021 (Form ADV)
- Blue Owl Capital Gp LLC Owns control (general partner, trustee or manager) of Blue Owl Capital Carry LP Partner, since 05/2021 (Form ADV)
- Lead Edge Principal Holdings Mh, LP
- Lead Edge Capital Management, LLC
- Appian Corporation Stake · Reston, Virginia, United States
- Weave Communications, Inc. Stake · Wilmington, Delaware, United States
- Yext Stake · New York, New York, United States
- Lead Edge Capital Management, LLC
Built from major holders from Schedules 13D and 13G; stakes of 5% or more it reported on Schedules 13D and 13G (3 companies); owners and owned firms from Form ADV, the registration investment advisers file with the SEC. Each entity in the chart links to its source.
Investment adviser
Lead Edge Capital Management, LLC is registered with the SEC as an investment adviser. This is what it reports on Form ADV, the registration every adviser files and keeps current.
- Assets it manages$6.8B2 14 accounts, $6.5B with discretion
- Employees68 40 in investment advice or research
- ClientsPooled investment vehicles (other than investment companies and: 14 ($6.8B)
- How it is paidA percentage of assets under its management; Performance-based fees
- What it doesPortfolio management for pooled investment vehicles (other than investment companies)
- Holds client assetsYes: cash and securities
- RegistrationSEC 801-100349, CRD 241795 IAPD record
Who owns it
Owners of 5% or more as the firm lists them (Schedule A), and the owners of those owners up the chain (Schedule B).
- LEAD EDGE PRINCIPAL HOLDINGS MH, LPowns 75% or more, since 07/2022
- BLUE OWL GP STAKES V (A) LPowns 10% to 25%, since 07/2022
- BLUE OWL CAPITAL GP LLCowns general partner, trustee or manager of BLUE OWL CAPITAL CARRY LP PARTNER, since 05/2021
- BLUE OWL GP STAKES ASSOCIATESowns general partner, trustee or manager of DYAL V CAYMAN LP, since 03/2020
- BLUE OWL GP STAKES ASSOCIATES V LPowns general partner, trustee or manager of DYAL U.S. V LLC, since 03/2020
- LEAD EDGE UGP, LLCowns general partner, trustee or manager of LEAD EDGE PRINCIPAL HOLDINGS MH, LP PARTNER, since 07/2022
- Nimay Kiran Mehtaowns general partner, trustee or manager of LEAD EDGE UGP, LLC (A) LP PARTNER, since 07/2022
- Brian Paul Neiderowns general partner, trustee or manager of LEAD EDGE UGP, LLC, since 07/2022
- BLUE OWL CAPITAL CARRY LPowns 75% or more of BLUE OWL GP STAKES GP HOLDINGS LLC, since 05/2021
- BLUE OWL CAPITAL GP HOLDINGSowns 75% or more of BLUE OWL CAPITAL GP, since 11/2021
- BLUE OWL CAPITAL HOLDINGS LPowns 75% or more of BLUE OWL CAPITAL CARRY LP PARTNER, since 04/2025
- BLUE OWL CAPITAL INC. (public company)owns 75% or more of BLUE OWL CAPITAL GP HOLDINGS LLC MEMBER, since 11/2021
- BLUE OWL GP STAKES V OFFSHOREowns 75% or more of DYAL V CAYMAN, since 03/2020
- DYAL LP HOLDINGS LLC LLCowns 75% or more of BLUE OWL GP STAKES ASSOCIATES V LP PARTNER, since 05/2021
- DYAL V CAYMAN AGGREGATOR LPowns 75% or more of DYAL U.S. V LLC, since 03/2020
- Mitchell Howard Greenowns 50% to 75% of LEAD EDGE PRINCIPAL HOLDINGS MH, LP PARTNER, since 07/2022
- Mitchell Howard Greenowns 50% to 75% of LEAD EDGE UGP, LLC, since 07/2022
- BLUE OWL CAPITAL GP LLCowns 25% to 50% of BLUE OWL CAPITAL, since 04/2025
In its own words: the client brochure
Form ADV Part 2A, the plain-English document an adviser must give its clients, quoted as filed 3/30/2026.3 It covers the firm’s services, fees, investment strategies and their risks, and its conflicts of interest.
Item 4: Advisory business Services
LECM, a Delaware limited liability company founded in 2013, is an investment management company which, directly and through its affiliates and subsidiaries provides investment management and advisory services to a series of private funds (each a “Fund” or a “Client” and collectively, including any future pooled investment vehicle for which LECM may serve as an investment adviser, the “Funds”, “Clients” or “Client Accounts”). While most Clients focus on equity investments primarily in the private venture capital and growth equity markets in the U.S. and abroad, such Clients may also make investments in publicly traded securities. In addition, LECM launched a Client in 2021 which solely invests in public securities. Mitchell H. Green holds a controlling interest in LECM, and is the firm’s senior managing member. LECM follows the investment objectives, strategies and guidelines of each Client as specified in its offering documents but does not tailor its investment advice to match the needs of any Investor, as defined in Item 5 below, in a Fund. As of December 31, 2025, LECM has approximately $6,766,485,175 regulatory assets under management of which $6,525,654,252 are managed on a discretionary basis and $240,830,923 on a non-discretionary basis.
Item 5: Fees and compensation Fees
LECM generally charges management fees at an annual rate of up to 2% of Client assets. Management fees are charged either monthly or quarterly and are generally paid in advance by deducting directly from Client Accounts. Investors in Client Accounts (“Investors”) are generally not eligible for partial refunds in the case of early withdrawals or redemptions, but specific details are set forth in each respective Client’s limited partnership agreement, limited liability company operating agreement and/or private placement memoranda (collectively, “Offering Documents”). LECM’s Investors may also be charged performance-based allocations, generally up to 20% of net profits. Performance-based allocations are drawn from Client Accounts either in the form of an incentive allocation or a profit allocation (sometimes referred to as “carry” or “carried interest”), and are generally paid either to an LECM affiliate or subsidiary. Specific details regarding any performance-based allocations are set forth in each respective Client’s Offering Documents. Fees for advisory services are negotiable at LECM’s discretion. Although it does not do so presently, the Adviser or its affiliates may also receive closing fees, management fees, advisory fees, financial consulting fees, commitment fees, monitoring fees (including termination fees), directors’ fees (including fees derived from a position with similar status or function in respect of a limited liability company), break-up fees, success fees, transaction fees, syndication fees or similar fees which generally are paid for by portfolio companies. Certain of these aforementioned fees offset management fees paid by the Clients once the Adviser or its affiliates receive a certain threshold of fees.
Other Costs All Clients incur third-party brokerage commission and other transaction costs, as explained in further detail in the Brokerage Practices section below. Clients also generally incur third-party costs related mainly to custody, audit, administration, legal advice, tax advice and preparation, banking services, and research and consulting. Clients will also bear any third-party costs related to fair value appraisal of account assets, as applicable. In addition, Clients are billed to reimburse LECM for certain expenses, including: travel related to marketing to and meeting with Investors; travel related to the investigation and monitoring of Client investments; reasonable costs for meetings with Investors and investments, including meals; research related to the investigation, evaluation and monitoring of Client investments, including data services; and consulting and advisory services related to the investigation, evaluation and monitoring of Client investments, including those related to the Adviser’s “operating partners”, some of whom may be members or partners of the general partner to certain private fund Clients and therefore affiliates of LECM. LECM has adopted an expense allocation policy establishing guidelines for determining such reimbursements from Client Accounts, as well as for the allocation of costs and expenses among multiple Client Accounts, when applicable. In all cases, details concerning applicable fees and expenses are set forth in each respective Client’s Offering Documents.
Item 8: Methods of analysis, investment strategies and risk of loss Investment strategies and risks
LECM provides investment management services to venture capital and growth equity fund Clients. Certain Clients target fast growing internet, services and software businesses of a certain size in terms of run-rate revenues or bookings, making equity investments on flexible terms and then leveraging their broad network of operational executives and direct investing professionals to help make high level introductions for these businesses that help accelerate the sales process and create value for management teams and their existing shareholders as well as their clients. In addition, another Client solely invests in public securities. This strategy involves a number of material risks, including, but not limited to: a restriction on the ability of Investors in the Clients to withdraw or redeem their capital; the ability of LECM and its investment professionals to correctly identify and assess good investment opportunities; and, for Clients investing in private markets, the lack of a liquid public market for investments and therefore a restricted ability to sell positions, particularly given the often early stage of development of the portfolio companies invested in, their frequent need for additional capital and the often rapidly shifting dynamics and intense competition that characterize the industries in which they operate. The following identifies risks associated with LECM’s Clients’ investment strategies. Risks specifically applicable to the Clients and securities its Clients’ invest in include, but are not limited to: Alternative Investment Vehicles. The Adviser has, and may continue to in the future, for tax, legal, policy, business, regulatory or other similar reasons, organize one or more special purpose entities or groups of entities, including special purpose acquisition companies, to invest in parallel with or in lieu of a private fund Client. Generally, in such event, each limited partner would participate in such alternative investment vehicles on substantially the same terms and conditions as it participates in the private fund Client. Risks Associated with Portfolio Investments. Identifying and participating in attractive investment opportunities and assisting in the building of successful young/emerging enterprises is difficult. There is no assurance that Clients’ investments in these portfolio companies will be profitable and there is a substantial risk that the Clients’ losses and expenses will exceed their income and gains. Any return on investment to the Investors will depend upon successful investments made on behalf of the Clients by an affiliate of LECM. There often will be little or no publicly available information regarding the status and prospects of portfolio companies. Reliance Upon Portfolio Company Management. Although the general partner may seek representation on the board of directors of portfolio companies or otherwise provide management and strategic planning assistance, the Clients will not have an active role in the day-to-day management of such companies. The success of the portfolio companies will depend in substantial part upon the skill and expertise of the portfolio company managers. The returns of the Clients will depend in large part on the performance of these unrelated individuals and could be substantially adversely affected by the unfavorable performance of a small number of such individuals. Conflicts of Interest. The Clients will be subject to various potential conflicts of interest. For example, members or partners of the general partner or an affiliated entity of LECM may receive directors fees or similar compensation from portfolio companies. While such fees may trigger an offset of the management
fee under the applicable partnership agreement (pursuant to which management fees payable to the management company by the Client may be reduced as an offset against fees received by the general partner or its members from portfolio companies), there is no assurance that the Clients will economically benefit from any particular portfolio company fees received by the general partner or its members or partners. Investments in Public Companies. Although most of the Clients intend to make investments primarily in private portfolio companies, certain Clients will invest a percentage of, or all of, their capital commitments in publicly traded companies. Investments in publicly traded companies may subject the Clients to risks that differ in type or degree from those involved with investments in privately held companies. Such risks include, without limitation, greater volatility in the valuation of such companies, increased obligations to disclose information regarding such companies, limitations on the ability of the Client to dispose of such securities (or securities of other companies) at certain times (including due to the possession by the Client or its representatives of material non-public information), increased likelihood of shareholder litigation against such companies’ board members, which may include management company personnel, regulatory action by governmental bodies and increased costs associated with each of the aforementioned risks. Moreover, investments in publicly traded companies often are subject to additional risks, such as increased risks of litigation and greater securities law and other regulatory burdens, as well as risks associated with insider trading, material non-public information, and similar rules. Certain Clients will acquire minority positions in publicly traded companies through open market purchases, negotiated transactions or private placements, including in connection with a potential strategic or control transaction. There can be no assurance that such Clients will be able to acquire a sufficiently large ownership position to implement its investment strategy with respect to such portfolio company. The value of such publicly traded securities may fluctuate prior to any potential transaction or exit, and adverse market developments could reduce the value of the Client’s investment. In addition, the securities of companies in which the Client invests may be thinly traded, and the disposition of a significant position could adversely affect the market price of such securities. Going-Private Transactions. Some Clients may participate in "going-private" transactions, which convert publicly traded companies into private companies that may be controlled by a Client. As a result, Clients that invest solely in public companies may hold investments in private companies following the completion of such going-private transactions. Such transactions involve a number of material risks, including potential shareholder litigation, the possibility that required approvals may not be obtained, and the risk that financing necessary to consummate the transaction may not be available. Following completion of a going-private transaction, the company will lose access to the public equity market and forfeit certain benefits of being publicly traded, including public company prestige and advantages, such as a secondary resale market, credit/financing flexibility, a public market basis for valuation of share price, and attractive public company option plans. These factors could adversely affect the company’s ability to execute its business strategy or compete in the market. In certain cases, a going-private transaction may involve multiple Clients managed by the Adviser. For example, a Client that invests in private companies may participate in, or sponsor, a going-private transaction involving a publicly traded company in which another Client holds an investment. In such circumstances, the Adviser will face inherent conflicts of interest in allocating investment opportunities, structuring and negotiating the terms of the transaction, and determining the timing and manner in which the public-company-focused Client exits or participates in the transaction. The Adviser’s duties to one Client may conflict with its duties to another Client, and the Adviser may have incentives to favor Clients
participating in the acquisition or control of the company, particularly where such Clients pay higher fees or provide greater economic benefits to the Adviser. As a result, the terms of any such transaction, including pricing and allocation decisions, may be more or less favorable to certain Clients than those available in an arm’s-length transaction with an unaffiliated third party. There can be no assurance that any conflicts of interest will be resolved in a manner that is favorable to all Clients, and any such conflicts could adversely affect the value of a Client’s investment. Non-United States Investments. The Clients may invest in securities of non-United States portfolio companies. Such investments present a variety of risks not presented by investments in United States portfolio companies, including risks associated with: (i) fluctuating currency exchange rates; (ii) limitations on currency exchange or the transfer of capital/profits across international boundaries; (iii) different accounting standards; (iv) different legal protections for Investors; (v) unusual regulatory burdens; (vi) political instability; and (vii) multiple taxing jurisdictions. Subject to the applicable Offering Documents, prospective Investors should carefully consider the risks involved in an investment with us, including, but not limited to, those discussed below. Prospective Investors should consult their own legal, tax, and financial advisers as to all of these risks and as to an investment with us generally. LECM’s investment strategy involves a risk of loss that Investors should understand and be prepared to bear. Liquidity Pressure from Midsized or Regional Banks. As a result of increasing interest rates, reserves held by banks and other financial institutions in bonds and other debt securities could face a significant decline in value relative to deposits and liabilities which, coupled with general economic headwinds resulting from a changing interest rate environment, creates liquidity pressures at such institutions. This pressure may be greater for midsized or regional banks that have less diversified customer bases or whose customer bases are concentrated in certain industries. Because of the nature of the Client’s portfolio companies, there is a risk that they will have exposure to midsized or regional banks that face liquidity pressure. As a result of this environment, certain sectors of the credit markets could experience significant declines in liquidity, and it is possible that the Clients will not be able to manage this risk effectively. Further details regarding these risks and other applicable risk factors are included in the Offering Documents of the Clients for which the Adviser performs investment advisory services, or in the advisory agreement or other documentation furnished to other Clients. Investors are advised to carefully review all risk factors described in such documents. The information above is not intended to supersede the material contained in such documents nor identify all possible risks of an investment with the Adviser.
Item 7: Types of clients
As discussed in the Advisory Business section above, LECM provides investment management services primarily to private fund Clients, which in turn are offered exclusively to sophisticated investors. Terms for each Account are individually negotiated.
Item 6: Performance-based fees and side-by-side management Conflicts of interest
As discussed in Fees and Compensation above, at times, LECM charges performance-based allocations. Side-by-Side Management and Allocation Policy The Adviser’s receipt of performance fees is intended to align the Adviser’s interests with those of the Clients and to provide the Adviser with a greater incentive to manage assets well. The nature of the performance fee, however, creates a potential conflict of interest among the Adviser, its associated persons, and its Clients. Because LECM has multiple Clients, at times it may need to allocate investment opportunities of limited availability across its Client Accounts. In such situations, some accounts may offer higher management and performance-based allocation potential than others. LECM has an incentive to favor Client Accounts for which it receives higher performance-based fees since it may receive a greater profit if the investment generates a positive return. To ensure equitable treatment of all Clients irrespective of such allocation considerations, LECM has adopted an investment allocation policy that sets out the criteria for determining allocations, the most important of which are investment objective and strategy, existing portfolio composition and available liquidity.
Item 10: Other financial industry activities and affiliations Conflicts of interest
LECM is not registered, and does not have an application to register, as a broker-dealer, a registered representative of a broker-dealer, a Futures Commission Merchant (FCM), a Commodity Pool Operator (CPO), or a Commodity Trading Advisor (CTA).
Item 11: Code of ethics, participation or interest in client transactions and personal trading Conflicts of interest
Code of Ethics. LECM maintains a code of ethics which includes policies regarding the trading of securities in personal brokerage or similar accounts by its principals and employees. The code does not restrict LECM principals, members and employees from maintaining or trading in such accounts, but establishes that any activity that either abuses confidential knowledge about Client Accounts or attempts to profit at their expense is considered an abuse of the foundation of trust upon which LECM’s business is built and is strictly prohibited. All LECM employees are required to submit annual reports on all covered securities holdings transactions in accounts controlled either directly or indirectly. Submitted reports are reviewed by the CCO, or her delegate. Employee trading is monitored in order to reasonably detect and prevent violations. Violations of the code of ethics policy are punishable by sanctions including fines and termination of employment. A copy of LECM’s code of ethics is available by contacting the CCO at the number or address listed on the cover of this Brochure. Participation or Interest in Client Transactions. Conflicts of interest may occur when LECM, or its related persons, including the general partners of certain Clients, invest in the same securities, trade in the same securities at or about the same time, or have a material financial interest in the same securities that LECM recommends to its Clients. For example, LECM and its related persons may invest their personal funds in the Clients, and, therefore, such persons may hold an indirect interest in the same securities as other Investors in the Clients. In addition, certain employees of LECM may own securities in their personal accounts that are also recommended by LECM to its Clients. LECM may also face conflicts of interest in connection with going-private transactions that involve multiple Clients, as described in Item 8 above. LECM has established procedures within the code of ethics and a personal trading policy, intended to limit conflicts of interest in cases where LECM, a related person or any employee, buys, sells or otherwise has an interest in, securities recommended by LECM to its Clients. Receipt of Material Non-Public Information. By reason of their responsibilities in connection with a Client and other activities, personnel of LECM may acquire confidential or material non-public information relating to potential or existing portfolio companies or may be restricted from initiating transactions in certain securities. For example, personnel of LECM may become aware of material non-public information relating to a company in connection with evaluating potential investments for a Client, serving on the board of directors of a portfolio company, the investment activities of LECM or through other interactions. In that event, a Client may be prohibited from buying or selling securities of that company as a result of LECM personnel or its affiliates becoming aware of that information even though their access to such information did not result from their activities on behalf of such Client. Due to restrictions with respect to publicly-traded securities, a Client may not be able to initiate a transaction in the securities of a company that it otherwise might have initiated and may not be able to sell an investment in a company that it otherwise might have sold if LECM personnel have access to material non-public information relating to such company. Even inadvertent trading on material non-public information could have adverse effects on LECM’s reputation, result in fines, penalties, or other sanctions, and negatively impact LECM’s ability to manage such Client. LECM maintains policies and procedures designed to prevent the misuse of material non-public information. LECM’s peronnel are required to comply with these policies at all times and certify their compliance on a periodic basis. LECM's policies prohibit LECM and its personnel from (i) trading in the securities of a company (either personally or on behalf of Clients) while in possession of
material non-public information about such company, and (ii) disclosing material non-public information about any company to others in violation of applicable law.
Item 12: Brokerage practices Conflicts of interest
To the extent the Clients engage in investments involving broker-dealers, LECM has discretion over the selection of brokers used for securities transactions in its Clients’ accounts, and its selection of brokers will include but not be limited to the following factors: the ability to effect prompt and reliable executions at favorable prices (including the applicable dealer spread or commission, if any); the operational efficiency with which transactions are effected, taking into account the size of order and difficulty of execution; the financial strength, integrity and stability of the broker; LECM’s risk in positioning a block of securities; the quality, comprehensiveness and frequency of available brokerage and research products and other services considered to be of value; and the competitiveness of commission rates in comparison with other brokers satisfying the other selection criteria. Currently, LECM has no formal soft dollar arrangements in place. Brokerage for Client Referrals At times, LECM directs some Client Account brokerage business to brokers who refer Investors to its Clients. Because such referrals, if any, are likely to benefit LECM but will provide an insignificant (if any) benefit to the Client, LECM will have a conflict of interest with its Clients when allocating Client Account brokerage business to a broker who has made such referrals. To prevent Client Account brokerage commissions from being used to pay referral fees, LECM will not allocate Client Account brokerage business to a referring broker unless it has been determined in good faith that the commissions payable to such broker are reasonable in relation to those available from non-referring brokers offering services of substantially equal value to the Client Account. Aggregation of Orders Pursuant to LECM’s Allocation and Aggregation of Investment Opportunities policy, LECM may aggregate orders of its Client Accounts for trade execution and thereafter allocate the securities on an average price basis to such Client Accounts. Transactional expenses are not reduced because of such aggregation. Further, if all orders placed for Funds cannot be fully executed under prevailing market conditions, then the securities traded should be allocated among the Funds on a pro rata basis or in some other equitable manner, taking into account the size of the order placed for each account and any other relevant factors. It is LECM’s belief that the above-described procedure for aggregating and allocating customer orders is consistent with the SEC's procedures recommending aggregation. LECM also believes that aggregation is consistent with its duty to seek best execution for all its Funds. Cross Trades LECM may effect cross trades, or otherwise reallocate securities, between Client Accounts, where it determines such transactions to be in the best interests of the participating Clients. These transactions may be undertaken for a variety of reasons, including, without limitation, in relation to going-private transactions, liquidity needs, portfolio rebalancing, tax considerations, diversification, or to reduce transaction costs that may arise in open market transactions. Cross trades may involve both publicly traded and private or illiquid securities.
Cross trades present conflicts of interest because LECM represents both the buying and selling Clients. For example, one Client may benefit from the timing of a trade relative to another, and Clients may not receive pricing that would be available in an arm’s-length market transaction. In addition, LECM may have an incentive to allocate underperforming or less liquid investments to one Client over another. Where private securities are involved, determining valuation or other transaction terms presents additional conflicts, including those arising from differences in fee arrangements. LECM maintains policies and procedures intended to limit the potential conflicts of interest inherent in cross transactions. LECM will effect a cross trade only if it determines that the transaction is in the best interests of each participating Client and in accordance with its fiduciary duties. Cross trades in publicly traded securities are generally aggregated and executed subject to best execution principles to mitigate timing-related conflicts. Transactions are effected at prices determined in accordance with the applicable Client’s valuation policy (or LECM’s overall valuation policy, as applicable). LECM does not receive compensation in addition to its standard management fees in connection with cross trades. All such transactions are conducted in compliance with applicable law, including Section 206(3) of the Advisers Act.
Item 14: Client referrals and other compensation Conflicts of interest
The Adviser receives no economic benefit from non-Investors in connection with Client transactions, and does not compensate any person for Investor referrals. Although no such arrangements are currently in place, LECM may in the future enter into arrangements with unaffiliated third parties whereby compensation is paid for referring Investors to the Funds. Generally, these payments will be based on a percentage of management fees, performance-based fees, or some combination thereof, earned by LECM with respect to such Investor. Because such arrangements contain inherent conflicts of interests between the referring party, on the one hand, and the Investor, on the other, LECM will require documentation that these conflicts have been disclosed and consented to by Investors. In addition, supervised persons of the Adviser currently, and may in the future, provide certain services to public or private entities, which may include service on the board of directors or other committees of portfolio companies or other entities. Fees or other economic benefits received in connection with such services, which may be paid directly or indirectly to a Client or retained by the supervised person or the Adviser.
Item 9: Disciplinary information
LECM does not believe that any of LECM, its subsidiaries or its affiliates, or any of the members, partners, officers or employees of LECM, its subsidiaries or affiliates have been involved in any legal or regulatory action, or other disciplinary event that is material to an Investor’s or prospective Investor’s evaluation of the advisory business or management of LECM, its subsidiaries or affiliates.
Item 13: Review of accounts
Client accounts are reviewed by the Adviser’s managing members and the Chief Financial Officer on either a daily, monthly or quarterly basis, depending on activity in the account and the frequency of Client reporting. Investors in the Funds can access written statements containing individual net asset values generally on a quarterly basis (in all cases, as set forth in the terms of the relevant Offering Documents), distributed via the firm’s hosted online investor reporting portal.
Item 15: Custody
For purposes of Rule 206(4)-2 under the Advisers Act (the “Custody Rule”), LECM is considered to have custody of Fund assets as a result of fee payments or the service of its affiliates as general partner to private investment partnerships. The Adviser complies with the Custody Rule by meeting the conditions
of the pooled vehicle annual audit provision with respect to assets it is deemed to have custody of. As such, such Funds’ assets and securities are held at a qualified custodian except with respect to privately offered securities which meet the criteria for such relevant exemption. LECM provides audited financial statements to the Funds, prepared in accordance with US GAAP, to all Investors in its Funds within 120 days after such Fund’s fiscal year end.
Item 16: Investment discretion
LECM provides discretionary and non-discretionary investment advisory services to its Clients. The specific terms of the scope of such investment discretion is detailed in the relevant Client’s Offering Documents.
Item 17: Voting client securities
LECM has adopted a proxy voting policy that is guided by its fiduciary responsibilities and commits its principals and employees to vote in a manner which is believed to do the most to maximize shareholder value and to never prioritize unrelated objectives. If a material conflict of interest between the Adviser and a Client exists, the Adviser will determine whether voting in accordance with the guidelines set forth in the proxy voting policies and procedures is in the best interests of the Client or take some other appropriate action. Proxy votes are reviewed by the CCO or her delegate for adherence to this policy, and a copy of both the policy and proxy voting record is available by contacting the CCO at the number or address listed on the cover of this Brochure.
Item 18: Financial information
LECM does not require or solicit prepayment of fees six or more months in advance. LECM has no financial condition to disclose that is reasonably likely to impair its ability to meet contractual commitments to its Clients. Additionally, LECM has not been the subject of a bankruptcy petition during the past ten years.
Filings
25 filings to the SEC since October 2021: 25 other. The latest 20:
- Aug 31, 2026N-PX EDGAR
- Aug 14, 202613F-HR EDGAR
- May 15, 202613F-HR EDGAR
- Feb 17, 202613F-HR EDGAR
- Nov 14, 202513F-HR EDGAR
- Aug 26, 2025N-PX EDGAR
- Aug 14, 202513F-HR EDGAR
- May 15, 202513F-HR EDGAR
- Feb 14, 202513F-HR EDGAR
- Nov 14, 202413F-HR EDGAR
- Aug 27, 2024N-PX EDGAR
- Aug 14, 202413F-HR EDGAR
- May 15, 202413F-HR EDGAR
- Feb 14, 202413F-HR EDGAR
- Nov 14, 202313F-HR EDGAR
- Aug 14, 202313F-HR EDGAR
- May 15, 202313F-HR EDGAR
- Feb 14, 202313F-HR EDGAR
- Nov 14, 202213F-HR EDGAR
- Aug 15, 202213F-HR EDGAR
The 25 filings since October 2021 can be filtered by form type and year here when JavaScript is on.
Every filing from the last five years, summarized. The full record is on SEC EDGAR.
Stakes it holds
Lead Edge Capital Management, LLC has told the SEC it owns more than 5% of 3 companies, latest first (Schedules 13D and 13G).
- Appian CorporationSCHEDULE 13G Jun 30, 20264
- Weave Communications, Inc.SC 13G/A Feb 14, 2022 to Aug 16, 20235
- YextSC 13D Oct 4, 20226
Sources
The numbers on this page point here. Each one links to the record it came from.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6