Sign in

PI on Nasdaq

Impinj

Logo: Impinj, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons5

American manufacturer of RFID devices

Impinj, Inc. is an American manufacturer of radio-frequency identification (RFID) devices and software. The company was founded in 2000 and is headquartered in Seattle, Washington. The company was started based on the research done at the California Institute of Technology by Carver Mead and Chris Diorio.3 Wikipedia text CC BY-SA 4.0

Price unavailable

Last updated Oct 21, 2026.

Overview

2000Founded1

Compare with Vicor Corporation, Varex Imaging Corp or NORTECH SYSTEMS INC, or pick any stock.

  • TickerPI on Nasdaq1
  • IndustryElectronic Components, NEC1
  • HeadquartersSeattle1
  • Websitewww.impinj.com
  • Legal formDelaware corporation1
  • Incorporated inDE6
  • Business address400 Fairview Avenue North, Suite 1200, Seattle, Wa 981096
  • Filer categoryLarge accelerated filer6
  • LEI549300M26VGKSMMWWN174
  • StatusActive4
  • LEI statusIssued and current4
  • Registered address251 LITTLE FALLS DRIVE, 19808 Wilmington, United States4
  • Registered withDivision of Corporations, Department of State, 32023034

See how the biggest companies compare on our leaderboards

Impinj, Inc. is an American manufacturer of radio-frequency identification (RFID) devices and software. The company was founded in 2000 and is headquartered in Seattle, Washington. The company was started based on the research done at the California Institute of Technology by Carver Mead and Chris Diorio. Impinj currently produces EPC Class 1, Gen 2 passive UHF RFID chips, RFID readers, RFID reader chips, and RFID antennas, and software applications for encoding chips, and gathering business intelligence on RFID systems.3

Financials

From the company’s reports to the SEC. Every number links to the filing it came from.

Key numbers, fiscal 2025

52.5%Gross margin8
-0.2%Operating margin8
-3.0%Net margin8
-1.4%Revenue growth, 20258
-5.2%Return on equity8
0.88×Debt to equity8
$45.9MFree cash flow8

What sells

Revenue by product, business segment and region, as the company reports it to the SEC.

Products and services

Endpoint I Cs brought in 83% of the revenue Impinj broke down this way in fiscal 2025.

  1. Endpoint I Cs$299.8M883%down 2% from 2024
  2. Systems$61.3M817%up 2% from 2024
Products and services by year
Products and services202320242025
Endpoint I Cs$234.4M$305.9M$299.8M
Systems$73.1M$60.2M$61.3M

Regions

Asia Pacific brought in 33% of the revenue Impinj broke down this way in fiscal 2025.

  1. Asia Pacific$209.9M833%up 0% from 2024
  2. China$159.2M825%down 2% from 2024
  3. Americas$124.9M820%up 13% from 2024
  4. United States$75.1M812%down 9% from 2024
  5. Mexico$41.3M86%
  6. EMEA$26.2M84%down 44% from 2024
Regions by year
Regions202320242025
Asia Pacific$176.4M$209.5M$209.9M
China$128.3M$162.7M$159.2M
Americas$96.4M$110.2M$124.9M
United States$86.2M$82.9M$75.1M
Mexico$41.3M
EMEA$34.7M$46.4M$26.2M

Where the money goes

Where each dollar of revenue went, fiscal 2025

  • Cost of revenue47¢$171.4M
  • Research and development28¢$102.6M
  • Other costs23¢$82.6M
  • Interest1¢$4.4M
  • Income tax0¢$69.0K

Out of $361.1M in revenue.8 The company lost money this year.

Where each dollar of operating cash went, fiscal 2025

  • Capital spending22¢$12.9M
  • Kept or used elsewhere78¢$45.9M

Out of $58.7M of cash from operations.8

Financial statements

Revenue91011128$361.1M in 2025+136% since 2019
0$100.0M$200.0M$300.0M$400.0M2019: $152.8M$152.8M20192020: $138.9M$138.9M2020−9%2021: $190.3M$190.3M2021+37%2022: $257.8M$257.8M2022+35%2023: $307.5M$307.5M2023+19%2024: $366.1M$366.1M2024+19%2025: $361.1M$361.1M2025−1%
Gross profit91011128$189.7M in 2025+156% since 2019
0$50.0M$100.0M$150.0M$200.0M2019: $74.0M$74.0M20192020: $65.1M$65.1M2020−12%2021: $99.0M$99.0M2021+52%2022: $137.9M$137.9M2022+39%2023: $152.0M$152.0M2023+10%2024: $188.9M$188.9M2024+24%2025: $189.7M$189.7M2025+0%
Operating income91011128-$737.0K in 2025−97% since 2019
-$60.0M-$40.0M-$20.0M02019: -$21.7M-$21.7M20192020: -$47.1M-$47.1M2020+117%2021: -$37.2M-$37.2M2021−21%2022: -$19.5M-$19.5M2022−48%2023: -$43.5M-$43.5M2023+123%2024: -$7.1M-$7.1M2024−84%2025: -$737.0K-$737.0K2025−90%
Net income91011128-$10.8M in 2025−53% since 2019
-$75.0M-$50.0M-$25.0M0$25.0M$50.0M2019: -$23.0M-$23.0M20192020: -$51.9M-$51.9M2020+126%2021: -$51.3M-$51.3M2021−1%2022: -$24.3M-$24.3M2022−53%2023: -$43.4M-$43.4M2023+78%2024: $40.8M$40.8M20242025: -$10.8M-$10.8M2025

Every line of the income statement as filed: the last 3 fiscal years, latest first.8

Period ending2025-12-312024-12-312023-12-31
Revenue$361.1M$366.1M$307.5M
Cost of revenue$171.4M$177.2M$155.6M
Gross profit$189.7M$188.9M$152.0M
Research and development$102.6M$98.8M$88.6M
Sales and marketing$36.5M$40.6M$41.1M
General and administrative$49.2M$51.8M$60.8M
Amortization of intangibles$2.1M$2.9M$5.0M
Restructuring costs$0$1.8M$0
Total operating expenses$190.4M$195.9M$195.5M
Loss from operations-$737.0K-$7.1M-$43.5M
Other income, net$9.2M$7.9M$4.6M
Income from settlement of litigation$0$45.0M$0
Induced conversion expense-$15.0M$0$0
Interest expense-$4.4M-$4.9M-$4.8M
Income (loss) before income taxes-$10.9M$41.0M-$43.7M
Income tax benefit (expense)$69.0K-$157.0K$322.0K
Net income (loss)-$10.8M$40.8M-$43.4M
Net income (loss) per share - basic-$0.37$1.46-$1.62
Net income (loss) per share - diluted-$0.37$1.39-$1.62
Weighted-average shares outstanding - basic29.3M shares28.0M shares26.8M shares
Weighted-average shares outstanding - diluted29.3M shares29.5M shares26.8M shares

Compare Impinj with another company

Corporate structure

Impinj sits at the top of its group. 1 entity, 1 country on record. Switch between the flow chart and the network, and select any entity to see its details.

Major holders of Impinj

  • Impinj Seattle, Washington, United States

Built from parent and subsidiary links from GLEIF, the Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (CC0); major holders from Schedules 13D and 13G. Each entity in the chart links to its source.

What it owns

What Impinj reports owning in its annual reports to the SEC: buildings, land and equipment, real estate and locations, investments, intangible assets and inventory, at the end of its latest fiscal year and a year before.

Property and equipment

ItemLatestA year beforeChange
Property and equipment, before depreciation$103.9M8 Dec 31, 2025$92.6M8 Dec 31, 2024+12.2%
Accumulated depreciation$53.6M8 Dec 31, 2025$42.0M8 Dec 31, 2024+27.8%
Property and equipment, net$50.3M8 Dec 31, 2025$50.6M8 Dec 31, 2024−0.6%
Operating-lease assets (leased space)$20.9M8 Dec 31, 2025$7.1M8 Dec 31, 2024+192.6%

Investments

ItemLatestA year beforeChange
Cash and cash equivalents$48.2M8 Dec 31, 2025$46.1M8 Dec 31, 2024+4.7%
Marketable securities, current$127.1M8 Dec 31, 2025$118.7M8 Dec 31, 2024+7.1%
Long-term investments$103.8M8 Dec 31, 2025$74.9M8 Dec 31, 2024+38.6%

Intangibles and goodwill

ItemLatestA year beforeChange
Goodwill$20.7M8 Dec 31, 2025$18.7M8 Dec 31, 2024+10.7%
Intangible assets, net (excluding goodwill)$9.5M8 Dec 31, 2025$10.3M8 Dec 31, 2024−7.7%
Finite-lived intangibles, gross$15.4M8 Dec 31, 2025$17.8M12 Dec 31, 2024−13.5%
Accumulated amortization$5.9M8 Dec 31, 2025$7.5M12 Dec 31, 2024−21.4%
Finite-lived intangibles, net$9.5M8 Dec 31, 2025$10.3M12 Dec 31, 2024−7.7%

Inventory

ItemLatestA year beforeChange
Inventory, total$85.0M8 Dec 31, 2025$99.3M8 Dec 31, 2024−14.5%
Raw materials$19.7M8 Dec 31, 2025$14.0M8 Dec 31, 2024+40.5%
Work in process$24.6M8 Dec 31, 2025$52.0M8 Dec 31, 2024−52.6%
Finished goods$40.6M8 Dec 31, 2025$33.3M8 Dec 31, 2024+22.0%

Properties, in its own words

We have several operating leases for office space, summarized as of December 31, 2025 in the table below. We believe that our facilities are adequate for our current needs.

Location · Purpose · Approximate Square Feet · Principal Lease Expiration Dates

The rest of Item 2

Seattle, Washington · Corporate headquarters · 70,000 · 2038

Seattle, Washington · Design laboratory · 29,000 · 2029

San Diego, California · General office space · 7,000 · 2030

Helsinki, Finland · Voyantic office space · 7,000 · 2027

Taipei, Taiwan · General office space · 1,000 · 2028

In addition, we lease offices in Thailand, Malaysia, Brazil, Japan and China. For more information about our lease commitments, please refer to Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.

Item 2 of the 10-K filed Feb 9, 2026.16

The story

Founded by Carver Mead in 2000.1

Impinj was founded in 2000 based on the research of Carver Mead and his student Chris Diorio. The name Impinj stands for "Impact-ionized Hot-electron Injection".

In 2006, Impinj became the first company to introduce products based on the EPCglobal UHF Gen 2 standard.

Bear Stearns reported in 2006 that Wal-Mart issued contracts to Impinj and Alien Technology, including them as significant suppliers for a total 15,000 RFID readers needed for Wal-Mart stores and distribution centers. The report invited speculation but was not confirmed.

In the same year, Impinj created new partnerships in Asia. In February, Impinj signed an Original Equipment Manufacturer agreement with the Hong Kong based company Convergence Systems Limited (subsidiary of the Chung Nam Group of Companies).

In December, Impinj partnered with Korean company LS Industrial Systems (part of LS Group) to create RFID solutions targeting the Korean market.

In June 2008, Impinj sold its non-volatile memory business to Virage Logic.

Also in 2008, Impinj acquired the Intel RFID division, including an Intel-developed RFID reader chip. Impinj renamed the chip Indy R1000.

In 2009, Coca-Cola unveiled their Freestyle soda machine that gives users one hundred and sixty five different possible drink combinations. The Freestyle soda machine uses Impinj Monza tag chips and Indy reader chips to determine user preferences and to monitor the dispensers.

Read the full text

Mexico has certified the Impinj Speedway reader to be used by state agencies in the electronic vehicle registration initiative beginning in Mexico in July 2010.

In 2005, Impinj began working with Intel to develop RFID chips that would allow for "Processor Secured Storage."

Impinj created two new chips for the project: Monza X-2K Dura and Monza X-8K Dura,

which allow for increased theft deterrence and wireless configuration of electronic devices. The chips will be used in Intel's Microsoft Windows 8-based processors for tablet computers, which will be released in the second half of 2012.

From Wikipedia’s article on Impinj, shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.7

Leadership

Who has led Impinj, and when. Pick a name to see everywhere that person has worked.

Chief executive

  1. Chris Ph.d. Diorio2016–now

Chief financial officer

  1. Evan Fein2016–2018
  2. Cary Baker2020–now

Chief operating officer

  1. Hussein Mecklai2022–now
20052010201520202025
Board members and other officers (16)

Products and brands

Monza RFID tag chips

Introduced in April 2005, Monza tag chips were the first UHF Gen 2 RFID tag chips.

Upon their introduction, it was announced that Impinj would be selling 50 million Monza tag chips that year. These 50 million chips were sold to nine different companies, including competitors Alien Technology and Texas Instruments. In 2010, Impinj introduced its Monza 4 tag chips with increased read and write capabilities and more memory options.

In April 2011, Impinj released their new Monza 5 chips which are designed to speed item-level encoding, with fewer errors. The Monza 5 can boost encoding speeds by up to 220 percent compared with other RFID technology on the market.

Announced in April 2012, Impinj's Monza X tag chips are intended for such applications as theft deterrence and wireless device configuration. When embedded in an electronic device (such as a laptop PC), the device processor or an RFID reader can write to or read data from that device through a Monza X chip, even when the device is powered off.

Read the full text

Impinj developed the Monza X chips through a partnership with Intel that began in 2005.

Impinj created the Monza X-2K and Monza X-8K Dura chips with lockable memory blocks and two independent antennas, which allow the chips to be read by both near field and long range readers.

Intel will be using the Monza X chips in Microsoft Windows 8-based processors for tablet computers, to be released in the second half of 2012.

Speedway RFID readers

Speedway is a registered trademark of Impinj. Speedway products include Speedway Revolution RFID Reader and Speedway xPortal RFID reader.

The Speedway RFID reader was first introduced in 2005 as the first RFID reader sold by Impinj. Designed to meet the RFID Gen 2 standards, Speedway was one of Impinj's GrandPrix products alongside Monza.

The Speedway Revolution RFID reader was introduced in 2009. The Speedway Revolution is 80% smaller than the original Speedway RFID reader, measuring 6.75 x 5.5 x 1 inches.

The Speedway Revolution introduced Autopilot technology, which enables the reader to reconfigure itself as the environment shifts.

Introduced in 2010, the Speedway xPortal is a RFID fixed reader that combined the Speedway Revolution with Dual-Linear Phased Array technology, with a smaller design than previous reader portals. Whereas previous portal readers weighed about 150 lbs, the Speedway xPortal weighs 6.5 lbs and measures 40.5 x 8.72 x 2 inches.

Indy RFID reader chips

In 2008, Impinj acquired the Intel RFID division, including an Intel-developed RFID reader chip which Impinj renamed Indy R1000. By combining many electrical components on one microchip, RFID reader chips can minimize size and costs of RFID readers. As of 2008, 40 to 50 manufacturers had developed readers using the R1000 chip.

In 2009, Impinj unveiled the Indy R2000 reader chip, with increased performance designed for use in high-end readers for more challenging applications. In 2010, Impinj further expanded their reader chip portfolio by introducing the Indy R500 reader chip, a lower cost chip for applications that don't require high performance.

STP Source Tagging Platform

In 2011, Impinj announced its STP Source Tagging Platform, a combination of a reader and firmware designed for mass encoding of RFID tags. The platform consists of two systems: bulk encoding for tags already attached to items, or in-line encoding before tags are applied to products. The STP platform is capable of encoding 1100 tags per minute in the bulk system, and up to 1750 tags per minute using the in-line system. In 2012, Impinj announced a version 2 release of the STP platform that will enable brand owners and service bureaus to achieve encoding speeds up to 7,500 tags per minute.

Store Performance Simulator

Impinj's Store Performance Simulator (SPS), released in June 2012, is a "Web-based analysis tool"

designed to show retailers how RFID can increase the accuracy of their inventory and positively impact profitability.

A retailer can use SPS's 25 inputs to reflect their particular store and simulate various "what-if" scenarios,

rather than running unfeasible real-world tests.

From Wikipedia’s article on Impinj, shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.7

Former names

  • IMPINJ INCDec 8, 2005 to Oct 13, 20266

Timeline

  1. Sep 11, 20268-K Other events36
  2. Jul 29, 20268-K Results of operations37
  3. May 29, 20268-K Shareholder vote38
  4. Apr 29, 20268-K Results of operations39
  5. Mar 16, 20268-K Other events40
  6. Feb 5, 20268-K Results of operations41
  7. Jan 13, 20268-K Results of operations42
  8. Dec 22, 20258-K Executive or director change43
  9. Oct 30, 20258-K Entered a material agreement; New debt or obligation44
  10. Oct 29, 20258-K Results of operations45
  11. Oct 20, 20258-K Executive or director change46
  12. Sep 8, 20258-K Entered a material agreement; New debt or obligation; Unregistered sale of shares47
  13. Jul 21, 2016Went public Listed on NASDAQ1
  14. Jul 20, 2016New chief executive Chris Ph.d. Diorio becomes CEO17
  15. 2000Founded Founded1

Calendar

Coming up

  1. Oct 28, 2026 · After the closeReports results for the quarter ending Sep/2026 A year earlier it reported $0.13 a share, on Oct 29, 2025.48

When it reported results

  1. Jul 29, 2026Reported quarterly or annual results37
  2. Apr 29, 2026Reported quarterly or annual results39
  3. Feb 5, 2026Reported quarterly or annual results41
  4. Jan 13, 2026Reported quarterly or annual results42
  5. Oct 29, 2025Reported quarterly or annual results45
  6. Jul 30, 2025Reported quarterly or annual results49
  7. Apr 23, 2025Reported quarterly or annual results50
  8. Feb 5, 2025Reported quarterly or annual results51

Upcoming dates from Nasdaq's calendar; past results from the company's 8-K filings (Item 2.02). The full markets calendar

Filings

793 filings to the SEC since October 2021: 5 annual reports, 15 quarterly reports, 49 major events, 414 insider forms, 35 large holders, 275 other. The latest 20:

  1. Oct 13, 20264 EDGAR
  2. Sep 24, 20264 EDGAR
  3. Sep 24, 20264 EDGAR
  4. Sep 21, 20264 EDGAR
  5. Sep 16, 20264 EDGAR
  6. Sep 15, 2026144 EDGAR
  7. Sep 15, 20264 EDGAR
  8. Sep 11, 20268-K EDGAR
  9. Aug 21, 20264 EDGAR
  10. Aug 21, 20264 EDGAR
  11. Aug 18, 20264 EDGAR
  12. Aug 12, 20264 EDGAR
  13. Aug 10, 2026144 EDGAR
  14. Aug 7, 2026SCHEDULE 13G EDGAR
  15. Jul 29, 202610-Q EDGAR
  16. Jul 29, 20268-K EDGAR
  17. Jul 14, 20264 EDGAR
  18. Jun 24, 20264 EDGAR
  19. Jun 24, 20264 EDGAR
  20. Jun 16, 20264 EDGAR

The 793 filings since October 2021 can be filtered by form type and year here when JavaScript is on.

Every filing from the last five years, summarized. The full record is on SEC EDGAR.

Insider trades

379 open-market trades by officers, directors and large owners since October 2021: 25 buys and 354 sales. Grants, option exercises and gifts are left out.

DateWhoTradeSharesPriceValueFiling
Sep 21, 2026Baker CaryCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERSale8,892$185.00$1.6MForm 4
Sep 15, 2026WASHINGTON MIRONDirectorSale800$173.26$138.6KForm 4
Aug 10, 2026Baker CaryCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERSale1,429$185.00$264.4KForm 4
Jun 9, 2026SYLEBRA CAPITAL LLCDirectorSale19,105$127.36$2.4MForm 4
Jun 9, 2026SYLEBRA CAPITAL LLCDirectorSale12,105$127.36$1.5MForm 4
Jun 8, 2026SYLEBRA CAPITAL LLCDirectorSale45,528$128.94$5.9MForm 4
Jun 8, 2026SYLEBRA CAPITAL LLCDirectorSale45,528$128.94$5.9MForm 4
Jun 5, 2026SYLEBRA CAPITAL LLCDirectorSale47,479$124.06$5.9MForm 4
Jun 4, 2026SYLEBRA CAPITAL LLCDirectorSale33,412$136.84$4.6MForm 4
Jun 3, 2026SYLEBRA CAPITAL LLCDirectorSale6,313$139.17$878.6KForm 4
Jun 2, 2026SYLEBRA CAPITAL LLCDirectorSale38,724$142.31$5.5MForm 4
Jun 1, 2026SYLEBRA CAPITAL LLCDirectorSale7,163$144.29$1.0MForm 4
May 29, 2026SYLEBRA CAPITAL LLCDirectorSale48,504$150.78$7.3MForm 4
May 11, 2026SYLEBRA CAPITAL LLCDirectorSale36,832$154.46$5.7MForm 4
May 11, 2026SYLEBRA CAPITAL LLCDirectorSale36,832$154.46$5.7MForm 4
May 8, 2026SYLEBRA CAPITAL LLCDirectorSale36,978$151.96$5.6MForm 4
May 8, 2026SYLEBRA CAPITAL LLCDirectorSale36,978$151.96$5.6MForm 4
May 7, 2026SYLEBRA CAPITAL LLCDirectorSale36,171$152.73$5.5MForm 4
May 7, 2026SYLEBRA CAPITAL LLCDirectorSale36,171$152.73$5.5MForm 4
Dec 15, 2025SYLEBRA CAPITAL LLCDirectorSale134,629$150.36$20.2MForm 4

All 379 trades can be filtered by person here when JavaScript is on.

From Forms 4 filed with the SEC.

Major holders

Investors who own more than 5% of the shares must tell the SEC: a 13D if they may seek to influence the company, a 13G if they hold passively.

Executive pay

What the company paid its top executives, from the summary compensation table in its proxy statement. Total pay includes salary, bonus, stock and option awards and other pay, as the company valued them.

YearExecutiveAgeSalaryTotal pay
2025Chris DiorioPh.D.$449.8K$7.1M63
2025Cary Baker50$405.5K$3.5M63
2025Cathal Phelan$394.8K$3.0M63
2025Hussein Mecklai$165.9K$302.7K63
2024Chief Executive Officer$432.9K$11.2M63
2024Chief Operating Officer$417.5K$4.5M63
2024Chief Financial Officer$387.4K$4.1M63
2024Chief Innovation Officer$378.7K$3.7M63
2023Chief Executive Officer$415.0K$6.8M63
2023Chief Innovation Officer$353.1K$5.4M63
2023Chief Operating Officer$401.2K$3.2M63
2023Chief Financial Officer$371.3K$2.9M63

Held by these funds

The largest holders among investment managers' 13F reports for the quarter ending Jun 30, 2026, the top 25 of 100. Change is in shares since the quarter before.

FundSharesValueShare of the fundChange
Fmr LLC4,562,799$653.5M0.0%+282,246
BlackRock, Inc.4,449,389$637.3M0.0%+135,885
Vanguard Portfolio Management LLC2,194,236$314.3M0.0%+54,078
State Street Corp1,700,585$243.6M0.0%+215,717
Capital International Investors1,443,452$206.7M0.0%+91,072
Vanguard Capital Management LLC1,282,667$183.7M0.0%+16,957
Capital World Investors1,124,066$161.0M0.0%+108,014
Millennium Management LLC834,376$119.5M0.1%+732,108
American Century Companies Inc804,335$115.2M0.1%−13,657
Sylebra Capital LLC775,943$111.1M11.8%−356,209
Chevy Chase Trust Holdings, LLC737,138$105.6M0.3%+8,743
Geode Capital Management, LLC733,594$105.1M0.0%+51,626
Manufacturers Life Insurance Company, The669,324$95.9M0.1%+243,379
Ameriprise Financial Inc530,926$76.0M0.0%−327,355
UBS Group AG414,418$59.4M0.0%−103,656
Point72 Asset Management, L.P.408,333$58.5M0.1%+119,202
Whale Rock Capital Management LLC405,244$58.0M0.5%No change
Goldman Sachs Group Inc388,783$55.7M0.0%+114,063
Morgan Stanley360,534$51.6M0.0%+89,057
Nuveen, LLC347,867$49.8M0.0%+50,345
Broad Bay Capital Management, LP328,700$47.1M4.5%New
Northern Trust Corp320,053$45.8M0.0%+24,649
William Blair Investment Management, LLC296,821$42.5M0.1%+40,610
Charles Schwab Investment Management Inc277,540$39.8M0.0%+14,796
Westfield Capital Management Co LP270,646$38.8M0.1%New

13F reports cover disclosed long positions in U.S. stocks only.

Members of Congress who traded it

7 trades disclosed by members of Congress. “Vs S&P since” is the stock’s change since the trade minus the S&P 500’s.

DateMemberTradeAmountVs S&P sinceFiling
May 14, 2025Marjorie Taylor GreeneRepublican, HouseBuy$1,001 - $15,000+25.8%Report
May 5, 2025Marjorie Taylor GreeneRepublican, HouseBuy$1,001 - $15,000+56.9%Report
Mar 3, 2025Marjorie Taylor GreeneRepublican, HouseBuy$1,001 - $15,000+85.4%Report
Feb 28, 2022Donald S. Beyer, Jr.Democratic, HouseSale$15,001 - $50,000−100.9%Report
Oct 4, 2021Donald S. Beyer, Jr.Democratic, HouseBuy$1,001 - $15,000+173.8%Report
Jul 27, 2020Donald S. Beyer, Jr.Democratic, HouseSale$1,001 - $15,000−392.2%Report
Jan 28, 2020Donald S. Beyer, Jr.Democratic, HouseBuy$1,001 - $15,000+319.4%Report

Members report amounts as ranges, not exact figures. Returns are price-only (no dividends).

SEC filer profile

How Impinj is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission, from its EDGAR record and the cover page of its latest annual report.

  • Name on EDGARIMPINJ INC2
  • CIK0001114995
  • Employer ID (EIN)91-204139816
  • Filer statusLarge accelerated filer not an emerging growth company; not a smaller reporting company; not a shell company16
  • Incorporated inDelaware16
  • Fiscal year endsDecember 312
  • Industry code (SIC)3679 Electronic Components, NEC2
  • SEC reviewing officeOffice of Manufacturing, Division of Corporation Finance2
  • Business address400 Fairview Avenue North, Suite 1200, Seattle, WA 981092
  • Phone206-517-53002
  • Shares outstanding30,554,413 as of Jul 17, 202614
  • Public float$2.9B as of Jun 30, 202516
  • AuditorErnst & Young LLP, Seattle, Washington PCAOB ID 42; it also attests to the company’s internal control over financial reporting16
  • On EDGAR sinceDec 8, 20052
  • Filings1,233 in all: 4 (608), 144 (244), 8-K (101), SC 13G/A (39), 10-Q (31), 3 (21), SC 13G (20), 4/A (14)2
    All 51 form types

    DEFA14A (12), S-8 (12), UPLOAD (11), 10-K (10), CORRESP (10), DEF 14A (10), SC 13D/A (10), S-1/A (7), REGDEX/A (5), 5 (4), ARS (4), 8-K/A (3), DRS/A (3), DRSLTR (3), EFFECT (3), S-1 (3), SC TO-I/A (3), SCHEDULE 13D/A (3), SCHEDULE 13G (3), SD (3), 10-K/A (2), 424B4 (2), CT ORDER (2), D (2), FWP (2), PRE 14A (2), REGDEX (2), SC 13D (2), SCHEDULE 13G/A (2), SEC STAFF LETTER (2), 10-Q/A (1), 144/A (1), 8-A12B (1), CERTNAS (1), DEFR14A (1), DRS (1), NT 10-Q (1), PRER14A (1), RW (1), S-1MEF (1), S-3 (1), S-3ASR (1), SC TO-I (1)

  • Latest filingsAnnual report (10-K) Feb 9, 2026
    Quarterly report (10-Q) Jul 29, 2026
    Proxy statement (DEF 14A) Apr 16, 2026
    Latest 8-K (8-K) Sep 11, 2026

Securities registered for trading

ClassSymbolExchange
Common Stock, $0.001 par value per sharePIThe Nasdaq Global Select Market

From the cover page of the 10-K filed Feb 9, 2026 (Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act).16

Risk factors and legal proceedings

The risks Impinj names in Item 1A of its 10-K filed Feb 9, 2026: 57 risks under these headings, as written.16

  • Risks Relating to Our Platform, Products and Technologies
  • We operate in a very competitive market.
  • RAIN adoption is concentrated in key markets and the extent and pace of RAIN market adoption beyond those markets is uncertain.
  • We must introduce new products, services and solutions to compete effectively.
  • Our ability to deliver enterprise solutions at scale is nascent.
  • We rely on endpoint IC sales to generate most of our revenue.
  • Average selling prices of our products could fluctuate substantially.
  • Pricing commitments and other restrictive provisions in our customer agreements could adversely affect our operating results.
  • Changes in our product mix could adversely affect our overall gross margin.
  • Poor product quality could result in significant costs to us and impair our ability to sell our products.
  • End users and partners must design our products into their products and business processes.
  • Our visibility into the length of the sales and deployment cycles for our products is limited.
The other 46 risks
  • An inability or limited ability of end user systems to exploit RAIN information may adversely affect the market for our products.
  • Alternative technologies may enable products and services that compete with ours.
  • Significant changes in RAIN standards bodies, standards or qualification processes, or their failure to meet or to keep up with RAIN market needs, could impede our ability to sell our products and services.
  • Changes in government spectrum regulations or in their enforcement could adversely affect our ability to sell our products.
  • Some of our partners offer competitive products or services.
  • Our licensing program is nascent and limited.
  • Risks Relating to Our Personnel and Business Operations
  • We obtain the products we sell through a limited number of third parties with whom we do not have long-term supply contracts.
  • The availability of silicon wafers and other key inputs to our business can fluctuate and shortages can adversely affect our revenue and/or gross margins.
  • We bear inventory risks because our products have relatively long lead times, demand for them is hard to accurately forecast, and we rely on partners to sell and distribute them.
  • We must attract and retain employees with specialized knowledge and experience to compete effectively.
  • Acquisitions could result in operating difficulties, dilution and other harmful consequences.
  • Changes in global trade policies could have a material adverse effect on us.
  • We are subject to risks inherent in operating abroad and may not be able to successfully maintain or expand our international operations.
  • We are subject to governmental export and import controls, and trade and economic sanctions that could impair our ability to compete in international markets and subject us to liability if we fail to comply.
  • Instability or deterioration in the political, legal, social, business or economic conditions in the U.S. or in key jurisdictions could harm our business.
  • Our business operations could be adversely affected by natural disasters or public health outbreaks and pandemics.
  • Utilizing emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, or AI, and machine learning, or ML, could expose us to business, financial, legal or reputational risks.
  • Risks Relating to Our Relationships with Partners and End Users
  • We rely on a small number of customers for a large share of our revenue.
  • Our ability to affect or determine end-user demand is limited in part because we sell and fulfill primarily through partners and rarely directly to end users.
  • Our partners may not properly forecast end users’ demand for our products.
  • Our growth strategy depends in part on the success of strategic relationships with third parties and their continued performance and alignment.
  • If we fail to maintain or enhance our brand recognition or reputation on which our business depends, then our business could be harmed.
  • Increasing attention to environmental, social and governance and regulatory matters may cause us to incur additional costs or expose us to additional risks.
  • Risks Relating to Our Intellectual Property
  • If we are unable to protect and enforce our intellectual property, then our business could be adversely affected.
  • We have been and may in the future be party to intellectual property disputes which could be time consuming and costly to prosecute, defend or settle, result in the loss of significant rights, and adversely affect RAIN adoption or adoption of our products or platform.
  • Intellectual property policies of industry standards organizations in whose working groups we participate could require us to provide royalty-free licenses of some to our intellectual property.
  • We rely on third-party license agreements which, if impaired or terminated, could cause production or shipment delays that could harm our business.
  • Our use of open-source software and AI tools may expose us to additional risks and weaken our intellectual property rights.
  • Risks Relating to Privacy and Cybersecurity
  • Privacy and security concerns relating to RAIN could damage our reputation and deter current or potential customers from using our products.
  • Government regulations and guidelines and other standards relating to consumer privacy and cybersecurity may adversely impact adoption of our products, require us to make design changes or constrain our ability to implement new and desired product features, and actual or alleged violations of laws relating to privacy or cyber security may result in claims, proceedings and liability.
  • A breach of security or other security incident impacting our systems or others used in our business could have an adverse effect on our business.
  • Risks Relating to Our Financial Position and Capital Needs
  • We have a history of losses and have only achieved profitability periodically. We cannot be certain that we will attain or sustain profitability in the future.
  • We have a history of significant fluctuations in our quarterly and annual operating results.
  • We may need to raise additional capital, which may not be available on favorable terms or at all.
  • Risks Relating to U.S. Federal Income Tax
  • Our ability to use net operating losses and research and development credits to offset future taxable income and income taxes may be limited.
  • We could be subject to additional income tax liabilities.
  • Changes in tax laws could have a material adverse effect on our business, cash flow, results of operations or financial conditions.
  • Taxing authorities may successfully assert that we should have collected or in the future should collect sales and use, value-added or similar taxes.
  • Risks Relating to Our Financial Reporting and Disclosure
  • Any failure to maintain an effective system of disclosure and internal controls over financial reporting, or our ability to produce timely and accurate financial statements, could adversely affect investor confidence in us.
  • Risks Relating to Owning or Trading Our Securities
  • The market price of our common stock has been and will likely continue to be volatile, and the value of your investment could decline significantly.
  • Transactions relating to the 2021 or the 2025 Notes may affect our stock’s value.
  • We are subject to counterparty risk with respect to the capped call transactions.
  • Our principal stockholders and management own a significant percentage of our stock and are able to exercise significant influence over matters subject to stockholder approval.
  • We may not have sufficient cash flow or access to cash necessary to satisfy our obligations under the 2021 Notes and the 2025 Notes, and our current and future indebtedness may restrict our business.
  • Anti-takeover provisions in our charter documents and under Delaware or Washington law could prevent, delay or impede an acquisition of us and constrain our stock price.
  • Our bylaws include provisions that could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers or employees.

Legal proceedings

As of the date of this report, we are not a party to any material legal proceedings. In the normal course of business, we may be named as a party to various legal claims, actions and complaints. We cannot predict whether any resulting liability will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows, market position or stock price.

The opening of Item 3, Legal Proceedings.16

Sources

The numbers on this page point here. Each one links to the record it came from.

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
  21. 21
  22. 22
  23. 23
  24. 24
  25. 25
  26. 26
  27. 27
  28. 28
  29. 29
  30. 30
  31. 31
  32. 32
  33. 33
  34. 34
  35. 35
  36. 36
    SEC EDGAROther events
  37. 37
  38. 38
  39. 39
  40. 40
    SEC EDGAROther events
  41. 41
  42. 42
  43. 43
  44. 44
  45. 45
  46. 46
  47. 47
  48. 48
  49. 49
  50. 50
  51. 51
  52. 52
  53. 53
  54. 54
  55. 55
  56. 56
  57. 57
  58. 58
  59. 59
  60. 60
  61. 61
  62. 62
  63. 63